An Analysis of Different Stakeholders' Motivations in Open Sharing of Scientific Data

  • Sheng Xiaoping ,
  • Wu Hong
Expand
  • 1. School of Library, Information and Archives, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444;
    2. School of Economics and Management, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006

Received date: 2018-10-12

  Revised date: 2019-04-02

  Online published: 2019-09-05

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to provide theoretical guidance for the practice of open sharing of scientific data in China by clarifying the motivations of open sharing of scientific data.[Method/process] The paper used stakeholder theory and normative analysis to analyzethe motivations of different stakeholders to participate in the open sharing of scientific data.[Result/conclusion] Stakeholder theory can be used to guide the practice of open sharing of scientific data. The stakeholders of open sharing of scientific data include governments, research institutions, research funding agencies, library and information agencies, data centers, professional associations, publishing companies, researchers, other enterprises, users and so on. These stakeholders all can benefit from the open sharing of scientific data, with different interests and motivations.

Cite this article

Sheng Xiaoping , Wu Hong . An Analysis of Different Stakeholders' Motivations in Open Sharing of Scientific Data[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019 , 63(17) : 40 -50 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.17.005

References

[1] FREEMAN R E. Strategic management:a stakeholder approach[M].Marshfield:Pitman Publishing Inc,1984:31-32.
[2] ANSOFF H I. Corporate strategy:an analytic approach to business for growth and expansion[M]. New York:McGraw Hill,1965:34.
[3] 李苹莉.经营者业绩评价:利益相关者模式[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2001.
[4] FREEMAN R E, HARRISON J S, WICKS A C, et al. Stakeholder theory:the state of the art[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2010:29.
[5] MAINARDES E W, ALVES H, RAPOSO M. A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships[J]. Management decision, 2012,50(10):1861-1879.
[6] FREEMAN R E, LIEDTKA J. Corporate social responsibility:a critical approach[J].Business horizons, 1991,34(4):92-98.
[7] FREEMAN R E. Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation[M]//DONALDSON T,WERHANE P. Ethical issues in business:a philosophical approach. 7th Edition. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 2002.
[8] MITCHELL R K, AGLE B R, WOOD D J.Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:defining the principle of who and what really counts[J]. The academy of management review, 1997,22(4):853-886.
[9] CO H C, Barro F. Stakeholder theory and dynamics in supply chain collaboration[J]. International journal of operations &production management, 2009,29(6):591-611.
[10] FRIEDMAN A L, MILES S. Developing stakeholder theory[J].Journal of management studies, 2002, 39(1):1-21.
[11] TANTALO C, PRIEM R L.Value creation through stakeholder synergy[J].Strategic management journal, 2014,37(2):314-329.
[12] BLAIR M M. Ownership and control——rethinking corporate governance for the twenty first century[M]. Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution,1995.
[13] MAINARDES E W, ALVES H, RAPOSO M. Stakeholder theory:issues to resolve[J].Management decision, 2011, 49(2):226-252.
[14] 王龙.利益相关者理论视域下中国高考制度的演进[D].南京:南京师范大学,2016.
[15] 王琦.基于利益相关者理论的企业社会责任实现机制研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2015.
[16] GAO T. A dynamic approach to stakeholder theory for temporary organizations[D]. Hoboken:Stevens Institute of Technology,2014.
[17] KLIEWE T. Value creation in university-industry relationships:a view on stakeholder and relationship value from the perspective of academics in England[D]. Coventry:Coventry University,2015.
[18] DONALDSON T, PRESTON L E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation:concepts, evidence, and implications[J].The academy of management review, 1995, 20(1):65-91.
[19] DOLS P T. Firm, stakeholders, value dynamics and social economic progress:the case of the Spanish pharmaceutical industry[D].Bellaterra:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,2015.
[20] KAUL I, MENDOZA R U. Advancing the concept of public goods[M]//KAUL I, CONCEICÃO P, GOULVEN K L, et al. Providing global public goods:managing globalization, Part 1.New York:Oxford University Press, 2003:78-111.
[21] 李建成.开放科学运动初探[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2010.
[22] 唐义,肖希明.开放科学发展历程及存在的问题与对策[J].情报资料工作,2013(5):20-24.
[23] 国务院.国务院关于印发促进大数据发展行动纲要的通知[EB/OL].[2019-01-15].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-09/05/content_10137.htm.
[24] THE ROYAL SOCIETY. Science as an open enterprise[M].London:The Royal Society,2012:21.
[25] Van VEENSTRA A F, Van den BROEK T A. Opening moves-drivers, enablers and barriers of open data in a semi-public organization[J]. Lecture notes in computer science,2013,8074:51-61.
[26] NASA. Data & information policy[EB/OL].[2019-01-15].https://science.nasa.gov/earth-science/earth-science-data/data-information-policy.
[27] 王敬涛.浪潮集团有限公司副总裁胡顺杰:应进一步加大数据开放共享力度[N].中国气象报, 2017-05-26(7).
[28] 杨洪颖.数据开放与国家振兴:剖析美国国有科学数据"完全、开放、无偿"共享策略[J]. 科技成果纵横, 2002(4):14-15.
[29] 傅小锋,李俊,黎建辉.国际科学数据的发展与共享[J].中国基础科学,2007,9(2):30-35.
[30] JANSSEN M, CHARALABIDIS Y, ZUIDERWIJK A. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government[J]. Information systems management,2012,29(4):258-268.
[31] STAGARS M. Open data in Southeast Asia[M]. Singapore:Palgrave Macmillan,2016.
[32] LERU.Open research data[EB/OL].[2019-01-15].http://www.leru.org/files/publications/Open_Access_to_Research_Data-FINALdocx.pdf.
[33] 逄杨.国内外科学数据与科技文献共享现状研究[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2009, 41(6):10-16.
[34] BORGMAN C L.The conundrum of sharing research data[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(6):1059-1078.
[35] UHLIR P F, SCHR DER P. Open data for global science[J/OL]. Data science journal,2007, 6[2019-01-15]. https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.2481/dsj.6.OD36/galley/367/download/.
[36] HEDRICK T E. Justifications for and obstacles to data sharing[M]//STEPHEN E F, MARGARET E M, MIRON L S. Sharing research data[M]. Washington, DC:National Academy Press,1985:123-147.
[37] STEPHEN E F, MARGARET E M, MIRON L S. Sharing research data[M]. Washington, DC:National Academy Press,1985.
[38] 房铁梅,顾立平,董洁.国外科学数据开放获取研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社.2017.
[39] HOUGHTON J, SHEEHAN P. Estimating the potential impacts of open access to research findings[J]. Economic analysis and policy, 2009,29(1):127-142.
[40] CODATA. The value of open data sharing[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/dsp/20151130_the_value_of_open_data_sharing.pdf.
[41] Van den EYNDEN V, KNIGHT G, VLAD A, et al. Towards open research:practices, experiences, barriers and opportunities[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6739038.
[42] PIWOWAR H A, DAY R S, FRIDSMA D B. Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate[J/OL]. Plos one, 2007,2(3):e308.[2019-01-15]. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000308.
[43] NORRIS M.The citation advantage of open access articles[D]. Loughborough:Loughborough University, 2008.
[44] 邱均平,何文静.科学数据共享与引用行为的相互作用关系研究[J].情报理论与实践.2015,38(10):1-5.
[45] 崔雁.科学数据开放中科研资助机构研究[J].图书馆杂志,2017,36(7):25-36.
[46] MRC. MRC policy on open research data from clinical trials and public health intervention studies[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. https://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/mrc-policy-on-open-research-data/.
[47] EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Guidelines to the rules on open access to scientific publications and open access to research data in Horizon 2020 Version 3.2[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf.
[48] HUBBARD C. Open data policy[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/legal/open-data-policy.
[49] OpenAIRE[EB/OL].[2018-08-06]. https://www.openaire.eu/.
[50] 林海青,楼向英,夏翠娟.图书馆关联数据:机会与挑战[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(1):58-67,112.
[51] 郭卫宁.美国学术图书馆联盟TRLN成员研究数据集调查分析[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(8):60-66.
[52] 欧石燕,唐振贵.面向图书馆关联数据的自动问答技术研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(6):44-60.
[53] 夏翠娟,刘炜,赵亮,等.关联数据发布技术及其实现——以Drupal为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2012, 38(1):49-57.
[54] 周宇,欧石燕.面向关联数据的高校机构知识库构建方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(1):105-113.
[55] 伍革新.基于关联数据的数字图书馆资源聚合与服务研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2013.
[56] 朱玲,聂华,崔海媛,等.北京大学开放研究数据平台建设:探索与实践[J].图书情报工作,2016, 60(4):44-51.
[57] GEZELTER D.What, exactly, is open science?[EB/OL].[2019-01-15].http://openscience.org/what-exactly-is-open-science/.
[58] COSTELLO M. Motivating online publication of data[J]. Bioscience,2009,59(5):418-427.
[59] 崔雁.科学数据开放中数据中心政策分析与建议[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(8):73-78.
[60] 张计龙,殷沈琴,张用,等.社会科学数据的共享与服务——以复旦大学社会科学数据共享平台为例[J].大学图书馆学报,2015(1):74-79.
[61] SPRINGER NATURE. Research data policy types[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. http://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/data-policy-types/12327096.
[62] 黄如花,赖彤.利益相关者视角下图书馆参与科学数据管理的分析[J].图书情报工作,2016, 60(3):21-25,89.
[63] 工业和信息化部.大数据产业发展规划(2016-2020年)[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. http://www.miit.gov.cn/n1146295/n1652858/n1652930/n3757016/c5464999/part/5465010.doc.
[64] 郄海霞.美国学术协会的功能及其对研究型大学的作用[J].清华大学教育研究,2012,33(1):51-58.
[65] DATA SHARNG WORKING GROUP. Data sharing:principles and considerations for policy development[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. https://www.apa.org/science/leadership/bsa/data-sharing-report.pdf.
[66] AMERICAN HEART ASSOCAITION. Open science policy statements for AHA funded research[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. http://professional.heart.org/professional/ResearchPrograms/AwardsPolicies/UCM_461225_Open-Science-Policy-Statements-for-AHA-Funded-Research.jsp.
[67] ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION. Philanthropists step up with $109 million for alzheimer's research[EB/OL].[2019-01-15]. https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/philanthropists-step-up-with-109-million-for-alzheimers-research-2018-07-21.
[68] MANYIKA J, CHUI M, GROVES P,et al. Open data:unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information[EB/OL].[2019-01-15].https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/open-data-unlocking-innovation-and-performance-with-liquid-information.
[69] 姜澎.科学数据开放共享亟待加快[N].文汇报,2016-08-27(2).
Outlines

/