[Purpose/significance] This paper discusses the main functions and realization paths for academic libraries serving the construction of university affiliated think tanks, providing references for the transformation and upgrading of academic libraries and the construction of New Think Tanks with Chinese Characteristics.[Method/process] Based on the systematic investigation on five think tank evaluation projects at home and abroad, the evaluation indicators are encoded and converged to extract the core elements of the development of think tanks. Based on the established linkage between these elements and the main tasks and functions of academic libraries, combining with the practice survey, the specific path for academic libraries to promote the construction of university affiliated think tanks is proposed.[Result/conclusion] Academic libraries can advance university affiliated think tanks development in terms of factor endowment, organizational construction, outcome output and comprehensive impact by improving top-level design, deepening core competence building, strengthening big data thinking and application capacity building, and promoting collaborative sharing with think tanks.
Deng Zhiqing
. The Paths for Academic Libraries Serving University Affiliated Think Tanks: A Study Based on Evaluation Indicators[J]. Library and Information Service, 2019
, 63(23)
: 21
-29
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.23.003
[1] MCGANN J G. The fifth estate:think tanks, public policy, and governance[M]. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press, 2016:5-61.
[2] 张日新, 杨松青, 李韵婷.高校智库异质性和影响力评价研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(3):200-207.
[3] 秦惠民, 解水青. 我国高校智库建设相关问题及对策研究[J]. 中国高校科技, 2014(4):15-20.
[4] Yale University Library:giving to the library[EB/OL].[2018-12-20]. https://web.library.yale.edu/development.
[5] American Library Association. State of America's libraries report 2014[R/OL].[2018-12-20]. http://www.ala.org/news/state-americas-libraries-report-2014/.
[6] 克勒纳. 智库概念界定和评价排名:待探求的命题[J]. 韩万渠, 译. 中国行政管理, 2014(5):25-28, 33.
[7] 金姗姗. 智库评价:新型高校智库建设有效工具[J]. 教育发展研究, 2016(11):78-84.
[8] 赵雪岩, 彭焱. 高校图书馆参与高校智库建设与服务的优势及路径研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(22):28-33.
[9] 刘敬仪, 廖宇, 江洪. 国外高校图书馆支撑智库建设的启示[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2018, 3(4):33-38.
[10] 高咏先. 国内高校智库数据库建设现状及图书馆服务策略研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(10):43-49.
[11] 万文娟. 面向高校智库的高校图书馆信息资源建设探讨[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(6):117-121.
[12] WU H. Exploring the coping strategies of university library and information organizations in the construction of national think tanks[C]//GAO J. 2019 international conference on arts, management, education and innovation. Ottawa:Clausius Scientific Press, 2019:18-23.
[13] 储节旺, 张瑜, 刘青青. 高校图书馆"双一流"建设的战略思考[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019(1):6-16.
[14] WEAVER R K. The changing world of think thanks[J]. PS:Political Science & Politics, 1989, 22(3):563-578.
[15] MCGANN J G. 2018 global go to think tank index report[R/OL].[2019-02-25]. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=think_tanks.
[16] 中国社会科学网:中国社会科学评价研究院智库评价课题组. 全球智库评价报告(2015)[EB/OL].[2019-02-27]. http://www.cssn.cn/xspj/qwfb/201806/t20180621_4373845_10.shtml.
[17] 张树良, 张志强. 国际智库评价体系发展现状及趋势分析[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(6):628-636.
[18] 邹婧雅, 冯雅, 李刚, 等. 2018CTTI来源智库发展报告[N]. 光明日报, 2019-01-07(16).
[19] 上海社会科学院智库研究中心. 2018中国智库报告:影响力排名与政策建议[R/OL].[2019-02-23]. http://www.pjzgzk.org.cn/c/3082.htm.
[20] 陈宁, 常鹤. 企业创新决策与成长路径——基于资源学派视角的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(3):458-465, 379.
[21] 德鲁克. 巨变时代的管理[M]. 朱雁斌, 译. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2009:16-29.
[22] 刘西忠. 融媒体时代智库成果如何社会化传播[N]. 光明日报, 2018-07-12(11).
[23] UNESCO. UNESCO public library manifesto 1994[EB/OL].[2018-08-10]. https://www.ifla.org/publications/iflaunesco-public-library-manifesto-1994.
[24] 苏新宁. 大数据时代数字图书馆面临的机遇和挑战[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(6):4-12.
[25] 陈光义. 运用大数据提升智库咨政水平[N]. 新华日报, 2018-05-15(13).
