[Purpose/significance] To take deep insight into collaborative information search behavior, which will provide reference and enlightenment for the construction and optimization of professional collaborative information search platform. [Method/process] This paper focused on information search behavior of the learning team. Taking university students as research samples, shared mental model was used as breakthrough point, grounded theory method was applied to collect data, and the shared mental model construction process of collaborative information search team was detected. [Result/conclusion] Four core interlinked elements were identified, which include individual perception and exploration, team task analysis, team information collection and team decision making. The cognitive activities and shared mental model contents of each element were also clarified.
Yan Duanwu
,
Zhang Xinyue
,
Tang Jiali
,
Su Qiong
. Research on Shared Mental Model of Learning Team in Collaboration Information Search[J]. Library and Information Service, 2020
, 64(8)
: 3
-12
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.08.001
[1] HANSEN P, JARVELIN K. Collaborative information retrieval in an information-intensive domain[J]. Information processing & management, 2005, 41(5):1101-1119.
[2] IBANEZ R G, HASEKI M, SHAH C. Let's search together, but not too c1ose! an analysis of communication and performance in collaborative information[J]. Information processing and management, 2013, 49(5):1165-1179.
[3] FOSTER J. Collaborative information seeking and retrieval[J]. Annual review of information science and technology, 2006, 40(1):329-356.
[4] 韩毅. 合作信息查寻与检索的内涵及分类研究[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(4):600-604,608.
[5] TAYLOR R S. Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries[J]. College & research libraries, 1968, 29(3):178-194.
[6] SONNENWALD D. H. Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts:interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control[J]. Information processing & management, 2000, 36(3):461-479.
[7] HERTZUM M. Breakdowns in collaborative information seeking:a study of the medication process[J]. Information processing and management, 2010, 46(6):646-655.
[8] KNIGHT S, RIENTIES B, LITTLETON K, et al. The orchestration of a collaborative information seeking learning task[J]. Information retrieval journal. 2017, 20(5):480-505.
[9] NDUMBARO F,MUTULA S. M. Collaborative information behaviour of butterfly farmers in Eastern Usambara Mountains, Tanzania[J]. Malaysian journal of library & information science, 2017, 22(2):15-29.
[10] HYLDEGARD J. Beyond the search process-exploring group members' information behavior in context[J]. Information processing and management, 2009, 45(1):142-158.
[11] NAOUAR F, HLAOUA L, OMRI M N. Collaborative information retrieval model based on fuzzy clustering[C]//International conference on high performance computing & simulation. Genoa:IEEE, 2017:495-502.
[12] MITSUI M, SHAH C. Coagmento 2.0:a system for capturing individual and group information seeking behavior[C]//Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on joint conference on digital libraries. New York:ACM, 2016:233-234.
[13] SHAH C, IBANEZ R G. Exploring information seeking processes in collaborative search tasks[J]. Proceedings of the American society for information science and technology, 2010, 47(1):1-7.
[14] KARUNAKARAN A, REDDY M C, SPENCE P R. Toward a model of collaborative information behavior in organizations[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2013, 64(12):2437-2451.
[15] REDDY M C, SPENCE P R. Collaborative information seeking:a field study of a multidisciplinary patient care team[J]. Information processing and management, 2008, 44(1):242-255.
[16] DINET J, VIVIAN R. The impact of friendship on synchronous collaborative retrieval tasks in the primary school[J]. British journal of educational technology, 2012, 43(3):439-447.
[17] TAO Y, TOMBROS A. How collaborators make sense of tasks together:a comparative analysis of collaborative sensemaking behavior in collaborative information-seeking tasks[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2017, 68(3):609-622.
[18] SHAH C, MARCHIONINI G. Awareness in collaborative information seeking[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(10):1970-1986.
[19] 韩毅, 李鹏, 李琳琳, 等. 嵌入合作的信息查寻与检索社会认知模型[J]. 情报科学, 2012(3):444-449.
[20] 褚峻, 张咏, 巢乃鹏. 信息查寻活动中的合作行为与合作式信息查寻[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2003(4):35-39.
[21] 金燕, 李昱瑶. 科研团队成员的协同信息行为模型[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(9):86-90.
[22] 代君, 郭世新. 协同信息搜索行为的触发情景因素探析——基于高校学生个人信息搜索失败情景[J]. 图书情报知识, 2016, 173(5):62-72.
[23] 韩毅, 周畅. 学术团队合作信息查寻与检索行为的影响因素实证研究[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(4):432-448.
[24] ROUSE W B, MORRIS N M. On looking into the black box:prospects and limits in the search for mental models[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1986, 100(3):349-363.
[25] BOWERS J A C, SALAS E, CONVERSE S. Shared mental models in expert team decision making[M]. Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
[26] MAYNARD M T, GILSON L L. The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness[J]. Group & organization management, 2014, 39(1):3-32.
[27] DENZAU A T, NORTH D C. Shared mental models:ideologies and institutions[J]. Kyklos, 1994, 47(1):3-31.
[28] MATHIEU J E, HEFFNER T S, GOODWIN G F, et al. Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models:equifinality and normative comparisons[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 2005, 26(1):37-56.
[29] GARDNER A K, SCOTT D J, ABDELFATTAH K R. Do great teams think alike? An examination of team mental models and their impact on team performance[J]. Surgery, 2017, 161(5):1203-1208.
[30] ZHOU Y, WANG E. Shared mental models as moderators of team process-performance relationships[J]. Social behavior and personality:an international journal, 2010, 38(4):433-444.
[31] 许科, 韩雨卿, 于晓宇,等. 快速信任与临时团队绩效:共享心智模型与团队互依性的角色[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(9):238-249.
[32] GLASER B, STRAUSS A L. The discovery of grounded theory:strategies for qualitative research[M]. Chicago:Aldine Publishing, 1967.
[33] COOKE N J, SALAS E, KIEKEL P A, et al. Team cognition:understanding the factors that drive process and performance[M]. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association, 2004.
