[Purpose/significance] Discipline competitiveness is the core embodiment of university's competitiveness. The development trend, competitive advantage and reputation image of universities are fundamentally reflected in the development level of disciplines. Therefore, it is an important issue for university management to find out the status, the direction, the gap to the benchmarking universities and formulate countermeasures. As a document information service center, the library can provide decision support services for decision makers in terms of discipline competitiveness based on abundant information resources and information analysis talents.[Method/process] It is that scientific and reasonable analysis index system and research methods of discipline competitiveness can lay a good foundation for scientific decision-making. The analysis system of discipline competitiveness includes the construction of the overall framework, the selection of index system, the definition of benchmarking institutions, the availability of data sources and the richness of analysis methods. Taking the discipline competitiveness analysis report completed by Peking University Library as an example, this paper made a comprehensive explanation of above.[Result/conclusion] Based on user demand research, the report adopts a comprehensive and objective indicator system to conduct in-depth processing and standardized operation of multimodal source data, and conducts multi-dimensional analysis of the data through a variety of analysis databases, data analysis software, visual analysis tools, etc., forming a set of scientific and effective analysis process and method of university discipline competitiveness. Based on this, it can provide in-depth subject information consultation and decision-making services for university leaders, scientific research teams, teachers and students and relevant institutions of the university, and also provide reference for more university libraries to carry out such services.
Li Feng
,
Zhang Huili
,
Zhang Chunhong
,
Xiao Long
. Process and Method of Universities Discipline Competitiveness——Taking the Analysis Report “Discipline Competitiveness of Peking University” as an Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2020
, 64(16)
: 13
-21
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.16.002
[1] 李春英,张巍巍,高琴,等."双一流"建设背景下的学科竞争力评价研究——以中国药学二级学科竞争力评价为例[J].大学图书馆学报,2018,36(2):45-51.
[2] 克拉克.高等教育系统——学术组织的跨国研究[M].王承绪,徐辉,殷企平,等译.杭州:杭州大学出版社,1994.
[3] 张会恒,文启湘.竞争力:要素性质体系[J].生产力研究,2004(9):55-57.
[4] 张金昌.国际竞争力评价的理论和方法[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002年.
[5] 张志新.关于城市竞争力及提升中国城市竞争力的思考[J].城市发展研究,2007(1):52-56,6.
[6] 李健宁.高等学校学科竞争力预警研究[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2005(3):38-42.
[7] 高宏利.省属高校科研竞争力评价研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2014.
[8] 赵飞,艾春艳,游越,等.基于文献计量开展高校科研评估的探索与思考——以北京大学科研竞争力评估为例[J].大学图书馆学报,2014,32(1):97-101.
[9] 王敬福.图书馆学学科竞争力评价模型构建研究[J].情报杂志,2009,28(3):85-88.
[10] 李茂茂,张子倩,陈仕吉,等.基于ESI的中国农业大学植物与动物科学学科竞争力分析[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(8):128-132.
[11] 张令伟.基于"钻石模型"的高校艺术学学科竞争力综合评价模型研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2015,36(6):119-123.
[12] GE Y. Analysis and research on the influence of university discipline based on Incites and ESI-taking materials science of Jianghan University as an example[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 8th international conference on management, education and information. Paris:Atlantis Press,2018:200-204.
[13] 余以胜,孙静蕾.基于Innography专利分析的世界"一流学科"竞争力评价——以入选电气工程专业"一流学科"的7所高校为例[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2019,25(3):122-133.
[14] REN R. International competitiveness evaluation research of Donghua University discipline[J]. Journal of Donghua University(natural science edition),2015, 41(6):851-856.
[15] 吴爱芝,肖珑,张春红,等.基于文献计量的高校学科竞争力评估方法与体系[J].大学图书馆学报,2018,36(1):62-67,26.
[16] 李津,赵呈刚.情报分析服务支撑高校"双一流"建设的实践与思考[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(24):18-26.
[17] 段丹,王伟,孙爽.基于Altmetrics视角构建财经类高校学科竞争力评价体系研究[J].情报探索,2017(11):34-38.
[18] 周磊,荀振芳.学科竞争力与学校竞争力实证研究——以33所行业特色型高校为例[J].中国高校科技,2018(Z1):53-56.
[19] 丰国政.基于ESI数据库的广东重点建设高校科研竞争力计量分析[J].高教探索,2016(3):41-45.
[20] 赵蓉英,全薇.面向世界一流大学的科研竞争力分析[J].高教发展与评估,2017(2):1-9.
[21] 陆根书,刘敏.我国高校学科竞争力及学科建设成效分析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2008,28(6):76-82.
[22] 任瑞荣,董政娥,陈惠兰.东华大学学科国际竞争力评价研究[J].东华大学学报(自然科学版),2015,41(6):851-856.
[23] 鲍庆晗,潘淑娟.基于ESI和InCites的吉林师范大学科研评价与学科竞争力分析[J].吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(2):115-119.
[24] 李桂影,周琴.高校科研竞争力分析及学科发展预测——以西安交通大学为例[J].情报探索,2015(12):58-61.
[25] 陈晓清.基于自然指数对中国高校学科竞争力的分析与思考[J].中国高校科技, 2018(Z1):90-95.
[26] 邱均平,张心源,董克.Altmetrics指标在机构知识库中的应用研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(2):100-105.
[27] 陈慧,段志光.我国高校护理学科核心竞争力评价指标体系研究[J].中国护理管理,2008(12):28-30.
[28] CHANG J, LIU J H. Methods and practices for institutional benchmarking based on research impact and competitiveness:a case study of Shanghai Tech University[J]. Joural of data and information science,2019,4(3):55-72.
[29] 俞立平,张晓东.基于熵权TOPSIS的地区高校科技竞争力评价研究[J].情报杂志,2013,32(11):181-186.
[30] ZHANG X. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of discipline competitiveness based on AHP[C]//Advancing knowledge discovery and data mining technologies, proceedings. Liverpool:World Acad Union-World Acad Press,2009.
[31] LIU H L. Disciplinary competition evaluation basis on the DEA cross-efficiency analysis[C]//IEEE international conference on industrial engineering & engineering management.Piscataway:IEEE,2010:669-672.
[32] 陈慧. 我国高校护理学科核心竞争力评价指标体系研究[D].太原:山西医科大学,2008.
[33] MOED H, PLUME A. The multi-dimensional research assessment matrix[J/OL]. Research trends,2011(23).[2019-12-25].https://www.researchtrends.com/issue23-may-2011/the-multi-dimensional-research-assessment-matrix.
[34] 李峰. 图书馆如何开展学科竞争力评价——由《英国科研表现之国际比较》报告得到的启示[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2015(2):72-76.
[35] QS methodology[EB/OL].[2019-12-25].https://www.topuniversities.com/subject-rankings/methodology.
[36] InCites indicators handbook[EB/OL].[2019-12-25]. http://help.incites.clarivate.com/inCites2Live/8980-TRS/version/default/part/AttachmentData/data/InCites-Indicators-Handbook%20-%20June%202018.pdf.
[37] Research metrics guidebook[EB/OL].[2019-12-25]. https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/resource-library/research-metrics-guidebook.
