The Collaboration Pattern and Comparative Analysis of Research Teams in the Artificial Intelligence Field

  • Wang Yuefen ,
  • Yang Xue ,
  • Yu Houqiang ,
  • Cao Jiajun
Expand
  • 1 School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094;
    2 School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798

Received date: 2020-05-11

  Revised date: 2020-07-06

  Online published: 2020-10-20

Supported by

 

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper discusses the collaboration pattern of research teams in the artificial intelligence field, and compares the differences among research teams in different collaboration pattern.[Method/process] Taking the identified AI leading research team as the research object, and according to the number of scholars and the indicator value of social network indicator in the team, the core scholars in the team were identified, so as to divide the collaboration pattern of the AI research team, and analyze the teams with different collaboration pattern with examples. On this basis, the differences among the leading teams of different collaboration pattern were compared and analyzed from several dimensions of network structure characteristics, research performance and geographical distribution.[Result/conclusion] The cooperative patterns, of research teams in the field of artificial intelligence are divided into four types:single-core pattern, dual-core pattern, multi-core pattern and equilibrium pattern. Among them, the research teams of single-core pattern and dual-core pattern all perform well in the research dimension.

Cite this article

Wang Yuefen , Yang Xue , Yu Houqiang , Cao Jiajun . The Collaboration Pattern and Comparative Analysis of Research Teams in the Artificial Intelligence Field[J]. Library and Information Service, 2020 , 64(20) : 14 -22 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.20.002

References

[1] 王新明,丁敬达.科研论文的著者合作模式研究综述[J].现代情报,2018,38(8):172-177.
[2] 李科利.长江中游城市群高校科研合作创新:模式、特征、策略——基于14所研究型大学的社会网络分析[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,41(4):23-27,38.
[3] 郭颍涛,杨思洛,邝飘.中外图书情报学科合作模式比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(10):120-123,128.
[4] WANG Y, WU Y, PAN Y, et al. Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 62(2):183-198.
[5] 邱均平,余厚强.我国情报学领域学者科学合作年龄结构分析[J].情报科学,2014,32(8):3-8.
[6] BOZEMAN B, CORLEY E.Scientists' collaboration strategies:implications for scientific and technical human capital[J].Research policy, 2004, 33(4):599-616.
[7] 崔鹤,王丹.中国高等教育研究领域个体、机构及地域科研合作情况研究——基于2016年18家教育类中文核心期刊的合著文献分析[J].中国高教研究,2017(4):48-55.
[8] BENCKENDORFF P, ZEHRER A.Career and collaboration patterns in tourism research[J].Current issues in tourism, 2016, 22(16):1-19.
[9] 曹玲,金殷玉,曹金爽.基于WoS数据的我国气象学者合作模式实证分析[J].南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版),2013,5(6):566-572.
[10] 邱均平,李威.知识转移领域作者合作模式实证分析[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(3):53-56,46.
[11] 韩芳芳,周畅.数字图书馆领域作者合作模式研究[J].知识管理论坛,2013(4):38-43.
[12] 王晓荣,吕艳华,张英杰,等.基于Citespace的糖尿病领域高被引论文作者合作模式分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2014,23(11):68-74.
[13] 刘蓓,袁毅,BOUTIN ERIC.社会网络分析法在论文合作网中的应用研究[J].情报学报,2008,27(3):407-417. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0135.2008.03.013.
[14] 董凌轩,刘友华,朱庆华.基于SNA的iConference论文作者合作情况研究[J].情报杂志,2013,32(10):82-88.
[15] 范如霞,曾建勋,高亚瑞玺.基于合作网络的学者动态学术影响力模式识别研究[J].数据分析与知识发现,2017,1(4):30-37.
[16] 王菲菲,陈晓璇,杨辰毓妍.合作网络视角下的基因编辑领域科研团队识别及产出绩效测度[J].中州大学学报,2018,35(3):75-80.
[17] 孟溦,李强,刘文斌.基于3E理论构建科研机构评价指标体系[J].科学学研究,2007(5):908-914,852.
Outlines

/