[Purpose/significance] As the integrative developing trend of "five metrics"is inevitable, the basic problems about integration of the foundation of the discipline and the subject construction of informetrics is discussed in this paper.[Method/process] Based on the information basic recurrence process, the analysis of the dialectical relationship among subject, subject objects, subject researchers, and the literature review, the basic problems and research ideas of "five metrics" integration are summarized. Using the tree structure analogy of the knowledge system studied the subjective structure construction of the "five metrics" integration. Using philosophical analyzing method and embryological investigating method studied the subjective and the formative structure construction of "five metrics" integration.[Result/conclusion] To solve the problem of the subjective and formative structure construction of the "five metrics" integration, the information metrics discipline system should be constructed. The logic starting point of "five metrics" is "information"; the subject discipline of "five metrics" is information in the "information basic recurrence process"; the development of "five metrics" is based on the embryological "double principle" theory, and follows the embryological theory of the dialectical unity of the heteronomy and automaticity; in accordance with the core values of "five metrics", unified in the three layer structure of "phenomenology-meta-methodology", the three dimensional structure of "theory-method-application", the longitude and latitude network structure of "diachrony-synchrony", and the theoretical system of "five metrics"; the academic thinking of "content-structure-form" system of "five metrics" integration is established.
Wang Hongxin
,
Huang Lijun
,
Liu Yang
,
Lin Kejia
,
Qiu Junping
. Study on the Base and Structure Construction of the Integrated “Five Metrics”[J]. Library and Information Service, 2020
, 64(20)
: 34
-45
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.20.004
[1] NACKE O. Informetrie:ein neuer Name für eine neue Disziplin[J]. Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 1979, 30(6):219-226.
[2] Brookes B C. Biblio-, sciento-, infor-metrics? What are we talking about?[M]//EGGHE L, ROUSSEAU R. Informetrics89/90:Selection of papers submitted for the Second International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1989.
[3] EGGHE L, ROUSSEAU R. Introduction to informetrics:Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1990.
[4] TAGUE-SUTCLIFFE J. An introduction to informetrics[J]. Information processing & management, 1992, 28(1):1-3.
[5] 刘则渊, 朱晓宇. 国际科学计量学及其姊妹学科的计量与图谱[J].科技导报,2012,30(7):68-79.
[6] 侯剑华, 都佳妮. 泛知识计量学科协同演进初探[J]. 情报科学, 2015, 33(7):7-10.
[7] 赵蓉英, 魏明坤."五计学"在我国的发展演进分析[J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37(6):155-159, 167.
[8] 宋艳辉, 孙玉坤. 我国"五计学"作者合作研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019, 39(4):22-28.
[9] 宋艳辉, 邱均平. 从"三计学"到"五计学"的演化发展[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019, 39(4):1-7.
[10] 宋艳辉, 邱均平. 我国"五计学"知识融合的思考[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(2):4-7.
[11] 赵蓉英, 张心源, 张扬, 等. 我国"五计学"演化过程及其进展研究[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(13):127-138.
[12] BJÖRNEBORN L, INGWERSEN P. Toward a basic framework for webometrics[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004, 55(14):1216-1227.
[13] 张洋. 网络计量学理论与实证研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2006.
[14] 王立良, 李琰, 宋艳辉. 知识计量学与"五计学"的关系辨析[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(专刊):372-377.
[15] HLAVCHEVA Y M, KANISHCHEVA O V, BORYSOVA N V. A Survey of Informetric Methods and Technologies[J]. Cybernetics and systems analysis, 2019, 55(3):503-513.
[16] 坚毅. 内容——结构——形式——关于唯物辩证法立体化范畴[J]. 求实, 2000, 42(2):13-14.
[17] 庞思奋. 哲学之树[M]. 翟鹏霄,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社, 2005:178-186.
[18] 王宏鑫.信息计量学研究[M]. 北京, 中国民族摄影艺术出版社, 2002:10-16.
[19] 波普尔.客观知识——一个进化论研究[M]. 舒炜光,等译. 上海:上海译文出版社,1987:9.
[20] 王宏鑫. 图书馆学及其对象的层次结构研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2011,31(5):1-7, 11.
[21] 邱均平, 王宏鑫. 20世纪文献计量学发展的层次分析[J].高校图书馆工作, 2000, 20(4):1-8,30.
[22] 倪梁康. 现象学运动的基本意义[J]. 中国社会科学, 2000, 21(4):69-78.
