[Purpose/significance] With the deepening of research on Altmetrics, it is of great significance to effectively identify the needs of stakeholders in Altmetrics evaluation,which is useful to design the evaluation indicators and construct the data infrastructure. [Method/process] Taking researchers of universities in China mainland as the sampling, this paper used the semi-structured interview to identify the Altmetrics evaluation needs for University researchers in China mainland, and used questionnaire to explore the differences of the identified Altmetrics evaluation needs for University researchers. [Result/conclusion] It is found that there are seven Altmetrics evaluation needs for University researchers in China mainland, which are research evaluation, achievement display, needs discovery, academic recognition, communication and dissemination, achievement operation and discipline development. There are need differences in "research evaluation" for University researchers among different age groups, in which the "research evaluation" needs in 51-60 age groups are clearly lower than the other age groups. Except for "communication", the other six Altmetrics evaluation needs in humanities are lower than the social and natural subjects, and the evaluation needs in social and natural subjects are equal. Except for the needs differences between teachers and students in "research evaluation", the other six Altmetrics evaluation needs are not different in all other different status categories of University researchers. The results show that 7 Altmetrics evaluation needs have high universal applicability.
Shen Lanni
,
Han Yi
. Needs and Its Differences Studies on Altmetrics Evaluation for University Researchers in China Mainland[J]. Library and Information Service, 2020
, 64(23)
: 40
-52
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.23.005
[1] 王贤文.Altmetrics:大数据时代的科学计量学[J].图书情报知识,2019(2):4.
[2] 韩毅.非正式交流回归语境下科技评价的融合路径取向[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(4):64-74.
[3] 清理"唯论文、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项"专项行动开展[EB/OL].[2020-06-27]. http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2018/10-24/8657958.shtml.
[4] 韩毅.中文学术成果评价的Altmetrics发展及实践路径[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018,37(1):81-86.
[5] MALONE T, BURKE S. Academic librarians? knowledge of bibliometrics and Altmetrics[J]. Evidence based library and information practice, 2016, 11(3):34.
[6] REED K, MCFARLAND D, CROFT R. Laying the groundwork for a new library service:scholar-practitioner & graduate student attitudes toward altmetrics and the curation of online profiles[j]. Evidence based library & information practice,2016,11(2):87.
[7] HOLMBERG K, VAINIO J. Why do some research articles receive more online attention and higher altmetrics? reasons for online success according to the authors[J]. Scientometrics,2018, 116(3):435-447.
[8] CHEN K H, TANG M C, WANG C M, et al. Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan[J].Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1):97-112.
[9] BHARDWAJ R K. Academic social networking sites:comparative analysis of ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley and Zotero[J]. Information and learning sciences, 2017,118(5/6):298-316.
[10] KWOK R.Research impact:Altmetrics make their mark[J].Nature,2013,500(7463):491-493.
[11] BIK H. Researchers who have used Altmetrics for tenure & grants[EB/OL].[2020-05-23]. http://blog.impactstory.org/right-metrics-generation-open-post.
[12] MOJISOLA E,HTET A H, SARA A A,et al. Analysing researchers' outreach efforts and the association with publication metrics:a case study of kudo[EB/OL].[2020-05-17]. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0183217.
[13] NICHOLAS D,HERMAN E,XU J,et al.Early career researchers' quest for reputation in the digital age[J].Journal of scholarly publishing,2018,49(4):375-396.
[14] YURI G A,BEKAIDAR N,MARLEN Y,et al.Researcher and author profiles:opportunities, advantages, and limitations[J].Journal of Korean medical science,2017,32(11):1749-1756.
[15] 徐曼.出版行业对大数据的应用思路探析[J].出版广角,2017(17):45-47.
[16] 杜秀杰,葛赵青,卓选鹏,等.数字出版时代学术论文的互动评价探索[J].编辑学报,2014, 26(1):10-12.
[17] NISO RP-25-2016 Outputs of the NISO Alternative assessment metrics project[R/OL].[2020-05-17]. https://www.niso.org/publications/rp-25-2016-altmetrics.
[18] 沈兰妮,刘艳笑,丁文姚,等.非正式交流回归视角下Altmetrics评价的利益相关者识别研究[J].图书与情报,2018(5):22-28.
[19] 陈向明.扎根理论的思路和方法[J].教育研究与实验,1999(4):58-63.
