[Purpose/significance] This paper compared and analyzed the current research status and key functions of representative knowledge organization system (KOS) management tools under the development of semantic web,sorts out the development trends of related research, and provided suggestions for the construction of knowledge organization system in various institutions.[Method/process] Through online survey, 10 representative foreign KOS management tools were selected, and their development status was compared and analyzed from the aspects of structural definition, project maintenance, data government, interoperability, and operating environment. Based on the survey results,we proposed some suggestions for the construction of KOS management tools in China.[Result/conclusion] Relying on the development of technologies such as semantic Web, linked data, semantic integration, and semantic interoperation, the domestic construction of KOS management tools should gradually achieve functional innovation, including flexible design of multiple data models, project management that supports sustainable development, distributed collaborative user management, knowledge driven data updating, semantic-oriented data utilization, KOS as the core of the knowledge organization framework, etc.
Ji Shanshan, Zhao Bingrong, Liu Zheng
. Comparative Analysis and Enlightenment of Foreign KOS Management Tools[J]. Library and Information Service, 2020
, 64(24)
: 73
-83
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.24.009
[1] 贺德方. 国内外知识组织体系的研究进展及应对策略[J].情报学报, 2010, 29(6):963-972.
[2] HEDDEN H. The accidental taxonomist[M]. Medford:Information Today, Inc., 2016.
[3] Knowledge organization systems:an overview[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub91/1knowledge.
[4] TUDHOPE D, NIELSEN M L. Introduction to knowledge organization systems and services[J]. New review of hypermedia and multimedia, 2006, 12(1):3-9.
[5] Taxonomy 101:The basics and getting started with taxonomies[EB/OL].[2020-09-28].http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/What-Is/Taxonomy-101-The-Basics-and-Getting-Started-with-Taxonomies-98787.aspx.
[6] 白海燕.传统知识组织工具管理软件的发展与评价[J].现代图书情报技术,2008(9):47-52.
[7] Taxonomy software trends.[EB/OL].[2020-09-28].https://accidental-taxonomist.blogspot.com/2015/01/taxonomy-software-trends.html.
[8] GANZMARM J. Criteria for the evaluation of thesaurus software[J]. Ko knowledge organiation, 1990, 17(3/4):148-57.
[9] CHAUDHRY A S. Assessment of taxonomy building tools[J]. The electronic library, 2010, 28(6):769-788.
[10] PEREZ-LEON B, MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ M M. A comparative study of thesauri tools-a perspective from integrability in information systems[C]//FILIPE J, CORDEIRO J. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Web information systems and technology. Setubal:SCITEPRESS, 2010:203-206.
[11] MYRSETH P, YANG J J, OVERBY E. Survey on vocabulary and ontology tools:including a methodology for comparing tools:version 1.0[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. http://www.semicolon.no/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Semicolon_Vocabulary-tools-survey_v1.0.pdf.
[12] MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ M M, ALVITE-DIEZ M L. On the evaluation of thesaurus tools compatible with the Semantic Web[J]. Journal of information science, 2014, 40(6):711-722.
[13] MOCHON G, MENDEZ E M, de la FUENTE G B. 27 pawns ready for action:a multi-indicator methodology and evaluation of thesaurus management tools from a LOD perspective[J]. Library hi tech, 2017, 35(1):99-119.
[14] MORSHED A, DUTTA R. Machine learning based vocabulary management tool assessment for the linked open data[J]. International journal of computer applications, 201260(9):51-58.
[15] 钱庆,胡铁军,李丹亚,等. 科技知识组织体系素材管理系统的设计与实现[J].数字图书馆论坛,2012(12):2-6.
[16] KMWorld 100 companies that matter in knowledge management 2020[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://www.kmworld.com/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=135998.
[17] HEDDEN H. Selecting software for taxonomy, thesaurus and ontology management[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. http://docplayer.net/162793744-Selecting-software-for-taxonomy-thesaurus-and-ontology-management.html.
[18] Vocbench[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. http://vocbench.uniroma2.it/.
[19] PoolParty[EB/OL].[2020-09-28].https://www.PoolParty.biz/.
[20] Synaptica KMS.[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://www.synaptica.com/synaptica-kms/.
[21] Synaptica Graphite[EB/OL].[2020-09-28].https://www.synaptica.com/synaptica-graphite/.
[22] TopBraid EDG vocabulary management[EB/OL].[2020-09-28].https://www.topquadrant.com/products/TopBraid-edg-vocabulary-management/.
[23] Mondeca ITM[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://mondeca.com/.
[24] SKOS Shuttle[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://skosshuttle.ch/.
[25] TemaTres[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://sourceforge.net/projects/TemaTres/.
[26] UniLexicon[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://unilexicon.com/.
[27] MultiTes[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. http://www.multites.com/.
[28] 张运良.大数据服务中知识组织的挑战及应对[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(4):88-94.
[29] BLUMAUER A, NAGY H. The knowledge graph cookbook[M]. Vienna:Edition mono/monochrom, 2020.
[30] NISO TR-06-2017, issues in vocabulary management[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://www.niso.org/publications/tr-06-2017-issues-vocabulary-management.
[31] Shapes constraint language (SHACL)[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/.
[32] 石泽顺,肖明.基于PoolParty的图情学科SKOS叙词表构建研究[J].图书馆学研究,2017(23):20-30.
[33] SKOS shuttle text extraction management[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://skosshuttle.ch/tutorials/skosshuttle-textextraction.pdf.
[34] QIN J. Knowledge organization and representation under the AI lens[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2020, 6(1):3-17.
[35] ISO-THES[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/iso-thes.
[36] 孙海霞, 李军莲, 华薇娜,等. 科技知识组织体系语义互操作网络协同工作平台设计与实现[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2019, 31(1):23-34.
