[1] 孔红梅,刘天星,段靖.同行评议初探[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(4):1004-1008.
[2] JR J A B, BERILD S, LINDENCRONA-OHLIN E, et al. Pros and cons of open peer review[J]. Nature neuroence,1999,2(3):197-198.
[3] 张劼圻.国外科技期刊开放式同行评议中参与者积极性研究[J].编辑学报,2015,27(4):319-322.
[4] 杜杏叶, 李贺, 王玲, 等. 中国学者对学术论文公开同行评议的接受度研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(2):73-81.
[5] ROOYEN S V, GODLEE F, EVANS S, et al. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations:a randomised trial[J]. BMJ,1999, 318(7175):23-27.
[6] WALSH E, ROONEY M, APPLEBY L, et al. Open peer review:a randomised controlled trial[J]. The British journal of psychiatry,2000,176:47-51.
[7] BRAVO G, GRIMALDO F, LÓPEZ-IÑESTA E, et al. The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1):1-8.
[8] 刘晶晶.国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式研究[J].编辑学报,2017,29(2):200-203.
[9] 张春丽,商丽娜,倪四秀.科技期刊开放式同行评议模式探索[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(11):1151-1155.
[10] 郑辛甜,张斯龙.学术期刊公开同行评议的发展现状及发展趋势[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(2):133-138.
[11] 彭琳,杜杏叶.科技期刊实施开放式同行评议策略研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(11):1114-1121.
[12] 刘丽萍,刘春丽.eLife开放同行评审模式研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2019,30(9):949-955.
[13] 陈爱香.开放存取期刊PLoS ONE网络出版模式研究[J].现代情报,2012,32(9):69-71.
[14] 谢文亮,王石榴.PeerJ的网络出版新模式及其对我国开放存取期刊的启示[J].出版发行研究,2015(5):82-85.
[15] 李金珍,庄景春,邱炳武.《心理学报》开放性同行评审方式探索及初步成效[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(2):139-142.
[16] 张晓,黄雪梅.开放的同行评议新模式分析与研究——以The Winnower平台为例[J].图书馆学刊,2016,38(9):24-27.
[17] 刘丽萍,刘春丽.基于Publons平台的审稿人贡献认可与评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2020,31(1):99-107.
[18] 黄颖,吴其达,宗乾进,等.审稿人工作量的影响因素研究——基于对Publons Top Reviewers个体特征的实证分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2019,30(9):956-961.
[19] 石进,苗杰,李明.面向预印本系统的自组织同行评议及激励机制研究[J].现代情报,2019,39(12):88-100.
[20] 王凌峰,孙英潮.E-prints预印本数据库的自组织同行评议模式设计[J].现代情报,2016,36(5):9-15.
[21] HAJJEM C, HARNAD S, GINGRAS Y. Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact[J]. IEEE data engineering bulletin,2005,28(4):39-47.
[22] ARCHAMBAULT E, AMYOT D, DESCHAMPS NICOL A., et al. Proportion of open access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world levels-1996-2013[EB/OL].[2020-08-20].https://science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf.
[23] ALHOORI H, RAY CHOUDHURY S, KANAN T, et al. On the relationship between open access and Altmetrics[EB/OL].[2020-08-21]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287996827_On_the_Relationship_between_Open_Access_and_Altmetrics.
[24] WANG X, LIU C, MAO W, et al. The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(2):555-564.
[25] ADIE E. Attention! a study of open access vs non-open access articles[EB/OL].[2020-08-21]. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1213690.
[26] TEPLITSKIY M, LU G, DUEDE E. Amplifying the impact of open access:Wikipedia and the diffusion of science[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2016, 68(9):2116-2127.
[27] HOLMBERG K, HEDMAN J, BOWMAN T D, et al. Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? an investigation of the research output of finnish universities[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 122(1):645-659.
[28] LUTZ B, WERNER M, HERMANN S, et al. From black box to white box at open access journals:predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics[J]. Research evaluation, 2010(2):105-118.
[29] ZONG Q, XIE Y, LIANG J. Does open peer review improve citation count? evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(1):607-623.
[30] 刘桂锋,钱锦琳,田丽丽.开放科学:概念辨析、体系解析与理念探析[J].图书馆论坛,2018,38(11):1-9.
[31] KRIEGESKORTE N. Open evaluation:a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science[J]. Frontiers in computational neuroscience,2012,6:79.
[32] ROSS-HELLAUER T, DEPPE A, SCHMIDT B. Survey on open peer review:attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers[J]. Plos one, 2017, 12(12):e0189311.
[33] ROSS-HELLAUER T. What is open peer review? a systematic review[J]. F1000research, 2017, 6:588.
[34] 刘意,文庭孝.学术迹在期刊评价中的应用及影响因素研究[J].情报资料工作,2019,40(4):69-76.
[35] 王凌峰,唐碧群.论文交流系统:1991年以来演进与性能比较[J].情报探索,2020(2):1-7.
[36] 张彤.学术期刊开放同行评议多层次模块化[J].编辑学报,2019,31(5):490-497.
[37] 贺子岳,张子纬,陈晓峰.学术期刊出版后开放式同行评议模式研究[J].传媒,2019(17):32-34.
[38] 孟美任,张晓林.中国科技期刊引入开放同行评议机制的思考与建议[J].中国科技期刊研究,2019,30(2):149-155.
[39] HUTCHINS B I, YUAN X, ANDERSON J M,et al. Relative citation ratio (RCR):a new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level[J]. PLoS biology, 2016,14(9):e1002541.
[40] BORNMANN L, HAUNSCHILD R. Relative citation ratio (RCR):an empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric ondicator[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017,68(4):1064-1067.
[41] 宋丽萍,王建芳,王树义.科学评价视角下F1000、Mendeley与传统文献计量指标的比较[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(4):48-54.
[42] 宋丽萍,王建芳.基于F1000与WoS的同行评议与文献计量相关性研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(2):62-69.
[43] 刘春丽,何钦成.不同类型选择性计量指标评价论文相关性研究——基于Mendeley、F1000和Google Scholar三种学术社交网络工具[J].情报学报,2013,32(2):206-212.
[44] 丁佐奇,郝海平.Altmetrics与传统计量指标的相关性分析及对科技期刊传播的启示[J].科技与出版,2019(11):134-139.
[45] 吴朋民,陈挺,王小梅.Altmetrics与引文指标相关性研究[J].数据分析与知识发现,2018,2(6):58-69.
