[1] UNESCO. UNESCO mobilizes 122 countries to promote open science and reinforced cooperation in the face of COVID-19[EB/OL].[2020-06-10]. https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-mobilizes-122-countries-promote-open-science-and-reinforced-cooperation-face-covid-19.
[2] UNESCO. UNESCO takes the lead in developing a new global standard-setting instrument on open science[EB/OL].[2020-06-20]. https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-takes-lead-developing-new-global-standard-setting-instrument-open-science.
[3] VICENTE-SÁEZ R, MARTÍNEZ-FUENTES C. Open Science now:a systematic literature review for an integrated definition[J]. Journal of business research, 2018, 88:428-436.
[4] DAI Q, SHIN E, SMITH C. Open and inclusive collaboration in science:a framework[EB/OL].[2019-12-20]. https://doi.org/10.1787/2dbff737-en.
[5] COOK B G, LLOYD J W, THERRIEN W J. Open science in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders[J]. Education and treatment of children, 2019, 42(4):579-600.
[6] BANKS G C, FIELD J G, OSWALD F L, et al. Answers to 18 questions about open science practices[J]. Journal of business and psychology, 2019, 34(3):257-270.
[7] 盛小平,杨智勇. 开放科学、开放共享、开放数据三者关系解析[J]. 图书情报工作,2019,63(17):15-22.
[8] 刘桂锋,钱锦琳,田丽丽. 开放科学:概念辨析、体系解析与理念探析[J]. 图书馆论坛,2018,38(11):1-9.
[9] 黄雨婷,赖彤. 美国开放科学中心:实践进展、特点与启示[J]. 图书与情报,2019(3):105-113.
[10] FECHER B, FRIESIKE S. Open science:one term, five schools of thought[M]//Opening science. New York:Springer, 2014:17-47.
[11] European Commission. Open science[EB/OL].[2020-06-15]. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/open-science.
[12] FOSTER. Open science definition[EB/OL].[2020-06-02]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/taxonomy/term/100.
[13] CHAN L, CUPLINSKAS D, EISEN M, et al. Read the budapest open access initiative[EB/OL].[2020-06-05]. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read.
[14] UNESCO. Open science movement[EB/OL].[2020-06-05]. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/.
[15] LAAKSO M, WELLING P, BUKVOVA H, et al. The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009[J]. Plos one, 2011, 6(6):e20961.
[16] PIWOWAR H, PRIEM J, LARIVIÈRE V, et al. The state of OA:a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles[J]. Peer J, 2018, 6:e4375.
[17] BJÖRK B C. Gold, green, and black open access[J]. Learned publishing, 2017, 30(2):173-175.
[18] VALDERRAMA-ZURIÁN J C, AGUILAR-MOYA R, GORRAIZ J. On the bibliometric nature of a foreseeable relationship:open access and education[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(3):1031-1057.
[19] ZHANG L, WATSON E. The prevalence of green and grey open access:where do physical science researchers archive their publications?[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(3):2021-2035.
[20] DOBUSCH L, HEIMSTÄDT M. Predatory publishing in management research:a call for open peer review[J]. Management learning, 2019, 50(5):607-619.
[21] ROSS-HELLAUER T. What is open peer review? A systematic review[J]. F1000 research, 2017, 6:1-38.
[22] LAWRENCE S. Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact[J]. Nature, 2001, 411:521.
[23] HAJJEM C, HARNAD S, GINGRAS Y. Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact[J]. IEEE data engineering bulletin, 2005, 28(4):39-47.
[24] MCKIERNAN E C, BOURNE P E, BROWN C T, et al. How open science helps researchers succeed[J]. ELife, 2016, 5:e16800.
[25] HOLLEY R P. Open access:current overview and future prospects[J]. Library trends, 2018, 67(2):214-240.
[26] WANG X, LIU C, MAO W, et al. The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(2):555-564.
[27] TENNANT J P, WALDNER F, JACQUES D C, et al. The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access:an evidence-based review[J]. F1000 research, 2016, 5:1-49.
[28] FELL M J. The economic impacts of open science:a rapid evidence assessment[J]. Publications, 2019, 7(3):1-30.
[29] HAMPTON S E, ANDERSON S S, BAGBY S C, et al. The Tao of open science for ecology[J]. Ecosphere, 2015, 6(7):1-13.
[30] ROUDER J N. The what, why, and how of born-open data[J]. Behavior research methods, 2016, 48(3):1062-1069.
[31] HARDWICKE T E, MATHUR M B, MACDONALD K, et al. Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility:evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal cognition[J]. Royal Society open science, 2018, 5(8):180448.
[32] European Commission. Open science (Open access)[EB/OL].[2020-07-20]. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/open-science-open-access.
[33] ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M. Open data policies, their implementation and impact:a framework for comparison[J]. Government information quarterly, 2014, 31(1):17-29.
[34] NEYLON C. Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers[J]. Research ideas and outcomes, 2017, 3:e14673.
[35] JONES L, GRANT R, HRYNASZKIEWICZ I. Implementing publisher policies that inform, support and encourage authors to share data:two case studies[J]. Insights, 2019, 32(1):1-11.
[36] ROUSI A M, LAAKSO M. Journal research data sharing policies:A study of highly-cited journals in neuroscience, physics, and operations research[J]. Scientometrics, 2020,124:131-152.
[37] NAUGHTON L, KERNOHAN D. Making sense of journal research data policies[J]. Insights, 2016, 29(1):84-89.
[38] GORMAN D M. Availability of research data in high-impact addiction journals with data sharing policies[J]. Science and engineering ethics, 2020, 26(3):1625-1632.
[39] Data Policy and Standardisation and Implementation Interest Group. Journal and publisher research data policy master framework DRAFT v1.2 Feb 2018[EB/OL].[2020-06-20]. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DTAfOKkE1a2n2f_1hGcrXlrw-5Tq_AL5tk-ju8B82_E/edit.
[40] YANCY C W, Harrington R A, Bonow R O. Data sharing-The time has (not yet?) come[J]. JAMA cardiology, 2018, 3(9):797-798.
[41] ABELE-BREHM A E, GOLLWITZER M, STEINBERG U, et al. Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing:a survey among members of the German Psychological Society[J]. Social psychology, 2019, 50(4):252-260.
[42] ROCKHOLD F W. Statistical controversies in clinical research:data access and sharing-can we be more transparent about clinical research? Let's do what's right for patients[J]. Annals of oncology, 2017, 28(8):1734-1737.
[43] THOROGOOD A. Canada:will privacy rules continue to favour open science?[J]. Human genetics, 2018, 137(8):595-602.
[44] HOEYER K, TUPASELA A, RASMUSSEN M B. Ethics policies and ethics work in cross-national genetic research and data sharing:flows, nonflows, and overflows[J]. Science, technology & human values, 2017, 42(3):381-404.
[45] ZUIDERWIJK A, SPIERS H. Sharing and re-using open data:a case study of motivations in astrophysics[J]. International journal of information management, 2019, 49:228-241.
[46] ROCKHOLD F, BROMLEY C, WAGNER E K, et al. Open science:the open clinical trials data journey[J]. Clinical trials, 2019, 16(5):539-546.
[47] CHAWINGA W D, ZINN S. Global perspectives of research data sharing:a systematic literature review[J]. Library & information science research, 2019, 41(2):109-122.
[48] ROSS J S, WALDSTREICHER J, BAMFORD S, et al. Overview and experience of the YODA Project with clinical trial data sharing after 5 years[J]. Scientific data, 2018, 5:180268.
[49] LEFAIVRE S C, BEHAN B, VACCARINO A L, et al. Big data needs big governance:best practices from Brain-CODE, the Ontario Brain Institute's neuroinformatics platform[J]. Frontiers in genetics, 2019, 10:191.
[50] CAPUZZI S J, KIM I S J, LAM W I, et al. Chembench:A publicly accessible, integrated cheminformatics portal[J]. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2017, 57(2):105-108.
[51] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Reproducibility and replicability in science[M]. Washington:The National Academies Press, 2019.
[52] MARWICK B. Computational reproducibility in archaeological research:basic principles and a case study of their implementation[J]. Journal of archaeological method and theory, 2017, 24(2):424-450.
[53] BRITO J J, LI J, MOORE J H, et al. Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research[J]. Gigascience, 2020, 9(6):giaa103.
[54] HETTNE K, PROPPERT R, NAB L, et al. ReprohackNL 2019:how libraries can promote research reproducibility through community engagement[EB/OL].[2020-07-17]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6f4zv.
[55] MELLOR D T. Guidelines for Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) in journal policies and practices "The TOP Guidelines"[EB/OL].[2020-07-17]. https://osf.io/9f6gx/wiki/Guidelines/.
[56] LEWANDOWSKY S, OBERAUER K. Low replicability can support robust and efficient science[J]. Nature communications, 2020, 11:358.
[57] LARSON M J. Improving the rigor and replicability of applied psychophysiology research:sample size, standardization, transparency, and preregistration[J]. Biofeedback, 2020, 48(1):2-6.
[58] BENTWICH M. Changing the rules of the game:addressing the conflict between free access to scientific discovery and intellectual property rights[J]. Nature biotechnology, 2010, 28(2):137-140.
[59] GANS J S, MURRAY F E, STERN S. Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge:intellectual property and academic publication[J]. Research policy, 2017, 46(4):820-835.
[60] OWENS B. Montreal instiute going "open" to accelerate science[EB/OL].[2020-07-10]. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/montreal-institute-going-open-accelerate-science.
[61] Open Data Institute. Publisher's guide to open data licensing[EB/OL].[2020-07-10]. https://theodi.org/article/publishers-guide-to-open-data-licensing/.
[62] KORN N, OPPENHEIM C. Licensing open data:a practical guide[EB/OL].[2020-07-10]. http://discovery.ac.uk/files/pdf/Licensing_Open_Data_A_Practical_Guide.pdf.
[63] ROSEN L. Open source licensing:software freedom and intellectual property law[M]. Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall, 2004.
[64] Open Source Hardware Association. Open-Source hardware FAQ[EB/OL].[2020-07-15]. http://www.oshwa.org/faq/.
[65] LUIS FELIPE R M, KAUTTU P, LAIA P P, et al. Open hardware licences:Parallels and contrasts[EB/OL].[2020-08-31]. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/312235/ki0119833enn.pdf?sequence=1.
[66] ALTUNAY M, AVERY P, BLACKBURN K, et al. A science driven production cyberinfrastructure-the open science grid[J]. Journal of grid computing, 2011, 9(2):201-218.
[67] DE ROURE D, GOBLE C, ALEKSEJEVS S, et al. Towards open science:the myExperiment approach[J]. Concurrency and computation:practice and experience, 2010, 22(17):2335-2353.
[68] NISHIKAWA K. How are research data governed at Japanese repositories? A knowledge commons perspective[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2020, 72(5):837-852.
[69] XAFIS V, LABUDE M K. Openness in big data and data repositories:the application of an ethics framework for big data in health and research[J]. Asian bioethics review, 2019, 11(3):255-273.
[70] OECD. Business models for sustainable research data repositories[EB/OL].[2020-07-22]. https://doi.org/10.1787/302b12bb-en.
[71] United Nations. Open science conference 2019[EB/OL].[2020-07-10]. http://research.un.org/conferences/OpenScienceUN.
[72] 顾立平. 科研模式变革中的数据管理服务:实现开放获取、开放数据、开放科学的途径[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2018,44(6):43-58.
[73] UNESCO. Preliminary study of the technical, financial and legal aspects of the desirability of a UNESCO recommendation on open science[R/OL].[2020-07-05]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370291.
[74] WILKINSON M, DUMONTIER M, AALBERSBERG I. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship[J]. Scientific data, 2016, 3:160018.
[75] European Commission. Open science policy platform recommendations[EB/OL].[2020-07-02]. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/integrated_advice_opspp_recommendations.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none.
[76] FOSTER. About FOSTER[EB/OL].[2020-07-02]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/about.
[77] Center for Open Science. Openness and reproducibility research practices training[EB/OL].[2020-07-02]. https://cos.io/our-services/training-services/.
[78] UNESCO. World science day for peace and development[EB/OL].[2020-07-02]. https://zh.unesco.org/commemorations/worldscienceday#theme.
[79] 金瑛,张晓林,胡智慧. 公众科学的发展与挑战[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019,63(13):28-33.
