[Purpose/significance] From the perspective of the researchers, this study empirically analyzed the changes and differences of the policies for the Plan S. In order to inspire the practice of open access in China.[Method/process] It used the method of literature research and content analysis. Based on the development of Plan S, we analyzed the content of the target policy. We focused on the recent new, including monitoring the effects of Plan S, rights retention strategy and Diamond Open Access.[Result/conclusion] Focus on the deep interpretation of the policy and dig the internal motivation, the Plan S are affected by qualifications, countries, subjects, the difficulty of the Green Open Access and the difficulty to distinguish predatory journal for the researchers. Therefore, setting up Open Access professional staff, formulating APC policy, reinforcing quality management of journals and promoting the construction of institutional repository. These policies of the Plan S may have positive influence on the polities of China.
Cui Liyuan
,
Liu Chunli
. The Development and Motivation of the Plan S to the Practice and Inspiration of Open Access in China[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021
, 65(4)
: 102
-110
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.04.011
[1] STAFFORD N. German universities take on Dutch publishing giant Elsevier[EB/OL].[2020-12-01]. https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/german-universities-take-on-elsevier-/3007807.article.
[2] MCKENZIEENZIE L. Florida state cancels bundled journal deal with Elsevier[EB/OL].[2020-12-01]. https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/04/26/florida-state-cancels-bundled-journal-deal-elsevier.
[3] Plan S. cOAlition S:making open access a reality by 2020[EB/OL].[2020-12-01]. https://www.coalition-s.org/coalition-s-launch/.
[4] 王元杰,齐秀丽,王应宽.国内外期刊开放获取出版现状与启示[J].中国科技期刊研究,2020,31(7):828-835.
[5] PRICE G. Springer Nature and University of California announce transformative agreement, largest transformative OA agreement in North America to date[EB/OL].[2020-10-10]. https://www.infodocket.com/2020/06/16/springer-nature-and-university-of-california-announce-transformative-agreement-largest-transformative-oa-agreement-in-north-america-to-date/.
[6] ROBBINS R. University of California strikes research access deal with Nature publisher, putting pressure on Elsevier[EB/OL].[2020-10-10]. https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/16/university-california-springer-nature/.
[7] ANDERSON R.Do you have concerns about Plan S? then you must be an irresponsible, privileged, conspiratorial hypocrite[EB/OL].[2020-10-10].https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/11/26/do-you-have-concerns-about-plan-s-then-you-must-be-an-irresponsible-privileged-conspiratorial-hypocrite/.
[8] DONALD G P. Open access versus accessibility:Evaluating Plan S[J].Cytotherapy,2020,22(8):399.
[9] QUADERI N, HARDCASTLE J, PETROU C, et al. S计划的足迹:对于学术出版行业格局的意义[J].科学观察,2019,14(6):48-61.
[10] SIVERTSEN G,孙异凡,丁念.关于开放获取出版模式转型的观察与思考[J].图书情报知识,2019(4):113-121.
[11] 中国科学院.《中国科学院科学数据管理与开放共享办法(试行)》印发[EB/OL].[2020-12-05]. http://www.cas.cn/sygz/201902/t20190221_4679910.shtml.
[12] 中国科学院文献情报中心. OA2020意向书中国大陆签署机构召开会议讨论对S计划实施指南的反馈意见[EB/OL].[2020-10-10]. http://www.las.cas.cn/xwzx/zyxw/201904/t20190401_5264254.html.
[13] 中国科学院文献情报中心.中国科学院文献情报中心与牛津大学出版社达成国内首个开放出版转换协议[EB/OL].[2020-10-10]. http://www.las.cas.cn/xwzx/zhxw/202005/t20200522_5584635.html.
[14] 邵曾婷,王译晗,叶钰铭,等.从开放获取到开放科学:开放获取周的主题、内容演变与启示[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(14):13-25.
[15] 许洁,马青青.睦盫场域理论视角下的开放获取S计划及其影响研究[J].出版科学,2019,27(4):99-104.
[16] 王春生.开放获取S计划:背景、内容与影响[J].数字图书馆论坛,2019(7):9-16.
[17] 范昊,王贺.欧洲开放获取政策及其启示——以"开放获取S计划"为例[J].图书馆学研究,2019(9):37-43,73.
[18] 崔丽媛,刘春丽.开放获取S计划及其修订版的产生、挑战与启示[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(12):58-66.
[19] Plan S.Communication on Plan S[EB/OL].[2020-09-11]. https://www.coalition-s.org/communication-on-plan-s/.
[20] Plan S. From principles to implementation:cOAlition S releases implementation guidance on Plan S[EB/OL].[2020-09-11]. https://www.coalition-s.org/implementation-guidance-on-plan-s-now-open-for-public-feedback/.
[21] Plan S.Monitoring the effects of Plan S on research and scholarly communication:an update[EB/OL].[2020-09-10].https://www.coalition-s.org/monitoring-the-effects-of-plan-s-on-research-and-scholarly-communication-update/.
[22] Plan S.Plan S rights retention strategy[EB/OL].[2020-09-11].https://www.coalition-s.org/rights-retention-strategy.
[23] Plan S. Opinion:the cOAlition S rights retention strategy[EB/OL].[2020-09-11]. https://www.coalition-s.org/opinion-rights-retention-strategy/.
[24] NOORDEN R V. Open-access Plan S to allow publishing in any journal[EB/OL].[2020-09-10].https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02134-6.
[25] Plan S.Exploring collaborative non-commercial publishing models for Open Access:tender results[EB/OL].[2020-10-10]. https://www.coalition-s.org/exploring-collaborative-non-commercial-publishing-models-for-open-access-tender-results/.
[26] Plan S. Help us get to know the open access journals and platforms that are free for readers and authors[EB/OL].[2020-10-11]. https://www.coalition-s.org/help-us-get-to-know-the-open-access-journals-and-platforms-that-are-free-for-readers-and-authors/.
[27] LEONELLI S. Early-career researchers respond to Plan S:interview with Sabina Leonelli of the Global Young Academy[EB/OL].[2020-10-11]. https://council.science/current/blog/early-career-researchers-respond-to-plan-s-interview-with-sabina-leonelli-of-the-global-young-academy/.
[28] RHODE S. Plan S for/versus early-career researchers[EB/OL].[2020-10-11]. https://blog.cabells.com/2019/11/20/plan-s-for-versus-early-career-researchers/.
[29] SPARCOPEN.Open letter to the White House signed by 21 Nobel Prize Winners[EB/OL].[2020-10-12].https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Open-Letter-to-the-White-House-Signed-by-21-Nobel-Prize-Winners.pdf.
[30] Plan S. cOAlition S response to the ERC scientific council's statement on Open Access and Plan S[EB/OL].[2020-11-12].https://www.coalition-s.org/coalition-s-response-to-the-erc-scientific-councils-statement-on-open-access-and-plan-s/.
[31] CROW R, GALLAGHER R, NAIM K. Subscribe to open:a practical approach for converting subscription journals to open access[EB/OL].[2020-11-12]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/leap.1262.
[32] SCHNEIDER L. Response to Plan S from academic researchers:unethical, too risky![EB/OL].[2020-11-12].https://forbetterscience.com/2018/09/11/response-to-plan-s-from-academic-researchers-unethical-too-risky/.
[33] SCHNEIDER L. Researchers reject APC-based OA publishing as promoted by Plan S[EB/OL].[2020-11-12]. https://forbetterscience.com/2019/06/11/researchers-reject-apc-based-oa-publishing-as-promoted-by-plan-s/.
[34] ACM.ACM signs new open access agreements with four leading universities[EB/OL].[2020-10-12].https://www.acm.org/media-center/2020/january/acm-open.
[35] ANDERSON R. The tyranny of unintended consequences:Richard Poynder on open access and the open access movement[EB/OL].[2020-10-10].https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/11/25/the-tyranny-of-unintended-consequences-richard-poynder-on-open-access-and-the-open-access-movement/.
[36] HARINGTON R. Plan S:what about researchers?[EB/OL].[2020-10-12]. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/01/14/plan-s-what-about-researchers/.
[37] EDITOR RESOURCES.Commentary on cOAlition S's revised Plan S[EB/OL].[2020-10-10].https://editorresources.taylorandfrancis.com/welcome-to-tf/policies-guidelines/plan-s/.
[38] Plan S.Plan S implementation guidelines for repositories:results of COAR repository platforms survey[EB/OL].[2020-10-11].https://www.coalition-s.org/plan-s-implementation-guidelines-for-repositories-results-of-coar-repository-platforms-survey/.
[39] COAR. Plan S iImplementation guidelines for repositories results of COAR repository platforms survey[EB/OL].[2020-09-11].https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/Results-of-the-Repository-Platforms-Survey1.pdf.
[40] Plan S.Why plan S[EB/OL].[2020-09-11].https://www.coalition-s.org/why-plan-s/.
[41] Plan S.cOAlition S releases revised implementation guidance on Plan S following public feedback exercise[EB/OL].[2020-09-11]. https://www.coalition-s.org/revised-implementation-guidance/.
[42] 袁子晗,张红伟.国内外掠夺性期刊研究现状与展望[J].中国科技期刊研究,2019,30(11):1135-1141.
[43] WordPress. Salient features of potential predatory biomed journals[EB/OL].[2020-10-12]. https://beallslist.net/how-to-recognize-predatory-journals/.
[44] CABELL.Cabell's blacklist of predatory journals passes 12,000[EB/OL].[2021-01-19].https://thepublicationplan.com/2019/11/26/cabells-blacklist-of-predatory-journals-passes-12000/.
[45] OA2020. 首期开放获取专员培训营开始报名啦[EB/OL].[2020-12-01]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/NlIryTCPBocK_9QmeKyzwg.
[46] 段美珍,顾立平,赵昆华.2015-2016年国际开放获取相关政策与实践进展[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(18):19-28.
[47] 赵昆华.OA2020倡议国际观测与政策建议[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(13):16-27.
[48] 中国科学院.关于破除科技评价中"唯论文"不良导向的若干措施(试行)[EB/OL].[2020-11-12]. http://www.cas.cn/zcjd/202002/t20200223_4735451.shtml.
[49] GoOA头条. 中国科学院文献情报中心推出APCheck,为作者发文提供APC合理性参考[EB/OL].[2020-11-12].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/gPFTtAHfa-zTkNfTBKSrzw.
[50] NATURE.Five ways China must cultivate research integrity[EB/OL].[2020-10-12].https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03613-1.
[51] 中科院文献情报中心分区表. 《国际期刊预警名单(试行)》正式发布[EB/OL].[2021-01-20]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/xbyJFtR2lezv6CyRrkxsdA.
