Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2021 , Vol. 65 >Issue 4: 144 - 152

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.04.015

FOCUS OVERSEAS

Research Status of Reading Services in Information Technology Environment Abroad Since 2017

  • Han Yan ,
  • Mao Yihong
Expand
  • College of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095

Received date: 2020-07-08

  Revised date: 2020-09-17

  Online published: 2021-04-14

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The purpose of this paper is to investigate and analyze the current status of foreign research on reading services in the information technology environment in recent three years and provide reference for the research and development of this field in China.[Method/process] In this paper, the relevant research results of foreign countries since 2017 have been retrieved and relevant research literature has been analyzed on the WoS platform. This paper summarized the related research results from the research themes and research methods, and extracted the advantages and characteristics of foreign research, finally formed the enlightenment for domestic related research.[Result/conclusion] The distribution of the existing information technology in the literature shows that the research on digital and mobile reading services is still a hot research direction abroad. In terms of users, the most relevant researches are conducted on students in K12 education stage. From the perspective of research topics, the number of researches on user behavior is the largest. In terms of research methods, the combination of foreign research preference experiment method with one or more of the questionnaire method, interview method and observation method. The research methods are suitable for the corresponding research problems. In the future, domestic research needs to pay continuous attention to the new generation of information technology and its application, continue to deepen the research on user behavior, and reasonably select the corresponding research methods according to the research problems.

Key words： reading service; smart reading; intelligent reading; 5G reading; VR reading; digital reading

Cite this article

Han Yan , Mao Yihong . Research Status of Reading Services in Information Technology Environment Abroad Since 2017[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021 , 65(4) : 144 -152 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.04.015

References

[1] 茆意宏,朱玲玲,韩燕.智慧阅读服务概念界定及国内相关研究评析[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(1):131-138.
[2] 张文亮,刘培旺.国内外数字阅读行为研究综述[J].农业图书情报,2019,31(12):5-13.
[3] 赵文军,陈焕之,蒋伟进.近10年来国内外数字阅读研究综述[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(18):128-136.
[4] 叶凤云.移动阅读国内外研究综述[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(11):142-145,127.
[5] 孟祥志,朱思灿.国内外关于移动学习的研究综述[J].现代农村科技,2017(6):81-82.
[6] TU Y F, HWANG G J. Trends of library-associated mobile learning based on a review of academic studies published from 2007 to 2016[J]. The electronic library, 2018, 36(5):875-891.
[7] HSU Y C, HO H N J, TSAI C C, et al. Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009:a content analysis of publications in selected journals[J]. Journal of educational technology & society, 2012, 15(2):354-370.
[8] 茆意宏,马坤坤.国内外关于数字阅读推广的研究现状与趋势[J].大学图书馆学报,2019,37(1):55-66.
[9] 侯雪,彭爱东.基于CitespaceⅢ的国内外移动阅读研究可视化对比分析[J].农业图书情报学刊,2016,28(10):55-60.
[10] 王锰,郑建明,陈雅.美国国民数字阅读行为影响特征分析及启示[J].图书馆杂志,2016(4):9-17.
[11] BLOM H, SEGERS E, KNOORS H, et al. Comprehension of networked hypertexts in students with hearing or language problems[J]. Learning and individual differences, 2019, 73(1):124-137.
[12] ZENG Y,BAI X,XU J,et al. The influence of e-book format andreading device on users' reading experience:a case study of graduate students[J].Publishing research quarterly,2017,32(4):1-12.
[13] HAHNEL C, GOLDHAMMER F, KR HNE U, et al. Reading digital text involves working memory updating based on task characteristics and reader behavior[J]. Learning and individual differences, 2017, 59(1):149-157.
[14] LIU S W, LIU Y T, CHEN C Y D. Meaningfulness is in the eye of the reader:eye-tracking insights of L2 learners reading e-books and their pedagogical implications[J]. Interactive learning environments, 2018, 27(2):181-199.
[15] THOMS J J, SUNG K Y, POOLE F. Investigating the linguistic and pedagogical affordances of an L2 open reading environment via, eComma:an exploratory study in a Chinese language course[J]. System, 2017, 69(1):38-53.
[16] ZHANG M, ZHU M, LIU X, et al. Why should I pay for e-books? an empirical study to investigate Chinese readers' purchase behavioural intention in the mobile era[J]. The electronic library:the international journal for minicomputer, microcomputer, and software applications in libraries, 2017,35(3):472-493.
[17] BACHTIAR F A, SULISTYO G H, COOPER E W, et al. Affect, personality, and learning styles in online reading comprehension[J]. Plos one,2017,12(10):78-83.
[18] NAUMANN J, SLZER C. Digital reading proficiency in German 15-year olds:evidence from PISA 2012[J]. Ztschrift für erziehungswissenschaft, 2017, 20(4):585-603.
[19] NOTTEN N, BECKER B. Early home literacy and adolescents' online reading behavior in comparative perspective[J]. International journal of comparative sociology, 2017, 58(6):475-493.
[20] LIU I F, KO H W. Roles of paper-based reading ability and ICT-related skills in online reading performance[J]. Reading and writing, 2018, 32(4):1-23.
[21] HO E S C, LAU K L. Reading engagement and reading literacy performance:effective policy and practices at home and in school[J].Journal of research in reading,2018(4):657-679.
[22] CHEN G,CHENG W,CHANG T W,et al. A comparison of read-ing comprehension across paper,computer screens,and tablets:does tablet familiarity matter?[J].Journal of computers in education, 2017, 1(2/3); 213-225.
[23] MANGEN A, OLIVIER G, VELAY J-L. Comparing comprehension of a long text read in print book and on kindle:where in the text and when in the story?[J]. Frontiers in psychology,2019,10(1):38.
[24] LADISLAO S, HELGE I S, KAMMERER Y, et al. Comprehension processes in digital reading[M]//Learning to read in a digital world. Netherlands:John Benjamins, 2018:91-120.
[25] SALMERN L, ARANTXAGARCÍA, VIDAL-ABARCA E. WebLEC:a test to assess adolescents' Internet reading literacy skills[J]. Psicothema, 2018, 30(4):388-394.
[26] BRÅTEN I., STADTLER M., SALMERÓN, et al. The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension[M]//SCHOBER M F, RAPP D N,BRITT M A. Handbook of discourse processes. 2nd ed. New York:Routledge, 2017:131-166.
[27] WU J Y, PENG Y C. The modality effect on reading literacy:perspectives from students'online reading habits, cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and Web navigation skills across regions[J]. Interactive learning environments, 2017,25(7):859-876.
[28] RVDIGER B, DOUCETTEE A, CURTIS J W. The application of artificial intelligence technologies as a substitute for reading and to support and enhance the authoring of scientific review articles[J]. IEEE access, 2019, 7(1):65263-65276.
[29] YOO S, LEMOS J, FINN E. Nellodee 2.0:a quantified self reading app for tracking reading goals[C]//ZAPHIRIS P, IOANNOU A. International conference on learning & collaboration technologies. Cham:Springer, 2017:122-140.
[30] MILLS C, GREGG J, BIXLER R, et al. Eye-Mind reader:an intelligent reading interface that promotes long-term comprehension by detecting and responding to mind wandering[J]. Human-computer interaction, 2020, 35(2):1-27.
[31] NORMAN V, TOREY L. The effects of media multitasking while studying:students' performance and perceptions[J]. Dissertations & theses gradworks, 2018, 20(4):44-48.
[32] DUFFEY S. New perspectives on reading and writing across the disciplines[J]. Diabetes mellitus, 2019, 33(4):401-408.
[33] RODRGUEZ G, CALIGARIS M, LAUGERO L, et al. Redesigning the class to engage students in their learning. an experience in numerical analysis[C]//Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference of education, research and innovation. Seville, Spain:IATED, 2017:161-176.
[34] SHI L K. Flipped-classroom implementation requires training of learners' online reading strategies[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 northeast asia international symposium on linguistics,literature and teaching. New York:New Vision Press,2017:148-153.
[35] TOBAR-MUÑOZ H, BALDIRIS S, FABREGAT R. Augmented reality game-based learning:enriching students' experience during reading comprehension activities[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 2017, 55(4):73-38.
[36] LAMB R L, ETOPIO E. Virtual reality simulations and writing:a neuroimaging study in science education[J]. Journal of science education and technology, 2019, 28(5):542-552.
[37] YI K, CHEN T, CONG G. Library personalized recommendation service method based on improved association rules[J]. Library hi tech, 2018, 36(3):443-457.
[38] PYÖRÄLÄ E, MAENPAA S, HEINONEN L, et al. The art of note taking with mobile devices in medical education.[J]. BMC medical education, 2019,19(1):96.
[39] LIU I F, KO H W. Roles of paper-based reading ability and ICT-related skills in online reading performance[J]. Reading and writing, 2019, 32(1):1037-1059.
[40] GHALEBANDI S G, NOORHIDAWATI A. Engaging children with pleasure reading:the e-reading experience[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 2019, 56(8):1213-1237.
[41] ELENA M,CHEN T G,CONG G D. Conceptualising the role of digital reading in social and digital inclusion[J]. Information research-aninternational electronic journal,2018,23(4):54-62.
[42] MULLINS K. Research PlusTM mobile app:information literacy "On the Go"[J]. Reference services review, 2017, 45(1):38-53.
[43] LIGHT R J, SMITH P V. Accumulating evidence:procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies[J]. Harvard educational review, 1971, 41(4):429-435.
[44] GLASS G V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research[J]. Educational researcher, 1976, 5(10):3-8.
[45] JOHANNES N. The skilled, the knowledgeable, and the motivated:investigating the strategic allocation of time on task in a computer-based assessment[J]. Frontiers in psychology,2019,10(5):1429.
[46] LIN C C, LIN V, LIU G Z. Mobile-assisted reading development:a review from the activity theory perspective[J/OL]. Computer assisted language learning, 2019.[2020-07-02].,https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1594919.
[47] CLINTON V. Reading from paper compared to screens:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of research in reading, 2019,42(2):288-325.
[48] DELGADOA P, VARGASB C, ACKERMANC R, et al. Don't throw away your printed books:a meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension[J]. Educational research review, 2018, 25(1):23-38.
[49] ELISA T W, JAN N, Time to read:exploring the timespaces of subscription-based audiobooks[J]. New media and society,2017,42(1):22-46.
[50] HAN L H, ZHANG G F, YONG B B, et al. Statistical study of characteristics of online reading behavior networks in university digital library[J]. World Wide Web, 2019,22(6):1175-1187.
[51] 赛迪智库. 2019年中国虚拟现实产业发展形势展望[N]. 中国计算机报,2019-03-11(12).
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.