[Purpose/significance] Audio reading has become a new growth point in national reading, and younger users have been the main users. By studying the audio reading requirements of university students, the research aims to provide a feasible way for detailed analysis of user requirements and clarify the focus and priority of library work, which help university library to deeply understand the audio reading requirements of university students and adopt targeted service strategies.[Method/process] Using the questionnaire survey method, the research investigates the audio reading behavior of college students, the cognition and utilization of the library audio reading service, and the audio reading requirements, and classifies the requirements based on the Kano model, and analyzes the main measures university library should take based on the QFD model.[Result/conclusion] More than half of respondents have audio reading experience, but they have insufficient knowledge and utilization of audio reading resources from their university library. However, most of them think it is necessary for university library to develop audio reading services. Users' requirement items can be classified to two categories:more than half of them are attractive requirements and a small number are indifferent requirements. The quality of resource content, retrieval and acquisition play an important role in improving user satisfaction. The focus of library work should be to optimize the system platform function and performance, improve the quality of audio reading resources, and provide high-performance equipment to create high quality audio space, strengthen publicity and promotion.
[1] 常晓武.我国有声读物的市场空间[J].编辑之友,2004(4):30-32.
[2] 中国新闻出版研究院全国国民阅读调查课题组.第十六次全国国民阅读调查主要发现[J].出版发行研究,2019(6):33-36,23.
[3] 刘彬.第十七次全国国民阅读调查报告显示:有声阅读成为国民阅读新增长点[EB/OL].[2020-11-30].http://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2020-04/21/nw.D110000gmrb_20200421_3-09.htm.
[4] 艾媒咨询.2018-2019年中国有声书市场专题研究报告[EB/OL].[2020-11-15].https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/63471.html.
[5] 邓香莲.新媒体环境下大学生有声阅读行为特征研究——以上海大学生为例[J].图书情报知识,2018(5):81-94.
[6] 梁荣贤.基于有声阅读的图书馆阅读推广新路径研究[J].图书馆研究,2020(1):64-68.
[7] 易观智库.2016中国有声阅读市场专题研究报告[EB/OL].[2020-11-15].https://www.sohu.com/a/65139167_158013.
[8] 前瞻经济学人.2018年中国数字阅读之听书市场现状及发展前景有声阅读市场增长潜力大[EB/OL].[2020-11-15].https://www.qianzhan.com/analyst/detail/220/190404-975719e5.html.
[9] 童云,周荣庭.论有声读物的用户需求及其超媒介生产策略[J].现代传播,2018(5):103-109.
[10] 黄浔.4I理论下我国有声读物营销研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2019.
[11] 于倩男.新媒体时代图书馆青少年有声阅读服务机制研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2019.
[12] 雷晓庆,韩思雨.关于高校用户使用有声读物APP的调查及分析[J].晋图学刊,2019(3):65-72.
[13] 柯佳秀,章小童,邓小昭.新媒体环境下大学生听书行为意向影响因素研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(10):101-109.
[14] STERN C. The role of audiobooks in academic libraries[J]. College & undergraduate libraries,2011,18(1):77-91.
[15] 卢晓君.有声图书馆:资源服务的新模式[J].大学图书情报学刊,2016(1):70-72,89.
[16] 徐月华.高校图书馆有声读物资源建设现状调查与分析——基于"双一流"大学图书馆的调查[J].图书馆工作与研究,2018(10):95-100.
[17] 李晓宁.公共图书馆有声读物服务现状与对策研究[J].图书馆学研究,2019(1):67-71.
[18] 郭嘉,孙琦,朱治衡.公共图书馆有声书资源的拓展与普及——以北京地区为例[J].现代出版,2019(3):57-59.
[19] 桑宇芳,何强.高校有声图书馆建设途径及实现策略[J].大学图书馆学报,2016(3):90-95.
[20] 孙英月.高校图书馆有声阅读资源构建研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2019(7):77-82.
[21] 李林华.我国移动听书APP的发展对建设移动有声图书馆的启示[J].图书馆工作与研究,2018(10):69-74.
[22] 陈颖.电子听书资源建设与图书馆网络时代的发展[J].图书馆工作与研究,2011(3):54-56.
[23] 常青.高校有声数字图书馆的功能定位及建设策略研究[J].图书馆界,2017(5):60-63.
[24] 陈琳,唐守利.浅析我国图书馆有声读物的利用及建设[J].图书馆理论与实践,2016(10):39-42.
[25] WITELL L, LOFGREN M, DAHLGAARD J J. Theory of attractive quality and the Kano methodology-the past, the present, and the future[J].Total quality management and business excellence,2013(24):11-12,1241-1252.
[26] KANO N, SERAKU N, TAKAHASHI F, et al. Attractive quality and must-be quality[J].Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control, 1984,14(2):147-156.
[27] AKAO Y.Quality function deployment:integrating customer requirements into product design[M]. Cambridge:Productivity Press,1990.
[28] MATZLER K, HINTERHUBER H H. How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment[J].Technovation, 1998,18(1):25-38.
[29] 赵文军,刘耀,李超良.高校图书馆移动阅读服务需求分类及满意度提升研究[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(24):86-96.
[30] 齐向华,黄丽娟.基于移动阅读内容需求的用户细分研究[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(3):60-64.
[31] 王萍,王毅,文丽.优化用户满意体验的数字资源建设探究[J].中国图书馆学报,2014(5):98-109.
[32] 易明,宋进之,李梓奇.基于Kano模型的高校智慧图书馆功能需求研究[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(14):45-53.
[33] 施国洪,张晓慧,夏前龙.基于QFD的移动图书馆用户需求评估研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(17):46-51.
[34] 刁羽.QFD技术在地方高校图书馆服务质量管理中的应用[J].图书馆理论与实践,2014(1):74-76.
[35] 王荣祥.基于QFD的图书馆服务质量评估方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(5):23-27.
[36] 唐晓玲,何燕.基于QFD和Kano模型的数字图书馆质量评估研究[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(6):89-92.
[37] 徐瑞芳.基于QFD-Kano模型的高校图书馆移动服务用户需求研究[D].太原:山西大学,2016.
[38] SARICKS J G. Reades' advisory service in the public library[M].Chicago:American Library Association,1989.
[39] DALI K. From book appeal to reading appeal:redefining the concept of appeal in readers' advisory[J]. The library quarterly,2014,84(1):22-48.
[40] 赵俊玲,白人杰,鲍玉静.阅读吸引力元素理论的形成与发展[J].图书情报研究,2018,11(4):9-13.
[41] YINGLING J. A study of audiobook users at the Salem,Ohio Public Library[D].Salem:Kent State University,1998.
[42] 刘冰,卢爽.基于用户体验的信息质量综合评价体系研究[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(22):56-59.
[43] 倪峰,李永明,郑德俊,等.移动图书馆服务平台的改进需求识别[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(21):17-23.
[44] 刘洁璇.高校图书馆有声读物引进问题研究——以南京师范大学图书馆为例[J].图书馆界,2015(5):69-72.
[45] 王汝兴.移动阅读用户满意度研究[J].情报探索,2016(2):57-59.
[46] 茆意宏.面向用户需求的图书馆移动信息服务[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(1):76-86.
[47] 徐艳.高校图书馆社会化阅读用户满意度影响因素实证研究[J].情报科学,2019,37(9):42-47.
[48] BERGER C, BLAUTH R, BOGER D.Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality[J]. Center for quality management journal,1993,2(4):3-36.
[49] TONTINI G. Integrating the Kano model and QFD for designing new products[J]. Total quality management, 2007,18(6):599-612.
[50] GARVER M S. Best practices in identifying customer-driven improvement opportunities[J]. Industrial marketing management, 2003,32(6):455-466.
[51] TAN K C, SHEN X X. Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment[J].Total quality management, 2000,11(8):1141-1151.
[52] TAN K C, PAWITRA T A. Integrating SERQUAL and Kano's model into QFD for service excellence development[J].Managing service quality,2002,11(6):418-430.
[53] 熊伟.质量功能展开:理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[54] MKPOJIOGU E O C, HASHIM N L. Understanding the relationship between Kano model's customer satisfaction scores and self-stated requirements importance[J/OL].[2020-05-25]. Springerplus, 2016.doi:10.1186/s40064-016-1860-y. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769705/.
[55] KANO N. Life cycle and creation of attractive quality[EB/OL].[2020-11-25]. http://huc.edu/ckimages/files/KanoLifeCycleandAQCandfigures.pdf.
