[Purpose/significance] Starting from the content of science and technology research, this paper discusses the collaborative direction and characteristics of basic research and technological innovation, and provides reference for the future collaborative development strategy of basic research and technological innovation.[Method/process] Firstly, investigating the research and development system of the field, and the intermediate classification axis of the field is constructed to connect the basic research and technological innovation. Then, the basic research direction and technological innovation direction are mined through literature content clustering, and the basic research direction and technological innovation direction are determined as three development states:hot direction, rapid development direction and slow development direction by quantitative evaluation method. Finally, based on the development status, the collaborative characteristics of basic research and technological innovation are summarized and applied to the empirical analysis of new electronic components.[Result/conclusion] The collaborative direction analysis of basic research and technological innovation in the field of new electronic components is realized by combining content mining with quantitative evaluation. The connection picture between basic research and technological innovation is clearly displayed at the level of more fine-grained research direction. The collaborative characteristics of both sides of basic research and technological innovation provide specific guidance for the development of collaborative direction in this field.
Zhang Lingling
,
Zhang Yu'e
,
Du Li
,
Ling Shiting
,
Lin Qing
,
Yu Mengxia
. Research on the Collaborative Direction and Characteristics of Basic Research and Technological Innovation——Taking the Field of New Electronic Components as an Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021
, 65(13)
: 55
-65
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.13.006
[1] RIP A. Science and technology as dancing partners[M]//Techno-logical Development and Science in the Industrial Age. Netherland:Springer Netherlands, 1992.
[2] 董坤, 许海云, 罗瑞, 等. 科学与技术的关系分析研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(6):642-652.
[3] 张金柱. 基于引用科学知识突变的突破性创新识别方法研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学, 2013.
[4] MEYER M. Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(2):193-212.
[5] BHATTACHARYA S, KRETSCHMER H, MEYER M. Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2):369-390.
[6] GLANZEL W, MEYER M. Patents cited in the scientific literature:An exploratory study of ‘reverse’ citation relations[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2):415-428.
[7] MEYER M, DEBACKERE K, GLANZEL W. Can applied science be ‘good science’? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(2):527-539.
[8] 吴菲菲, 黄鲁成, 石媛嫄. 基于文献和专利相互引用的科学与技术关系分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34(10):13-20.
[9] LO SZU-CHIA. Scientific linkage of science research and technology development:a case of genetic engineering research[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(1):109-120.
[10] 白光祖, 郑玉荣, 吴新年, 等. 基于文献知识关联的颠覆性技术预见方法研究与实证[J].情报杂志, 2017, 36(9):38-44.
[11] YEH H Y, SUNG Y S, YANG H W, et al. The bibliographic coupling approach to filter the cited and uncited patent citations:a case of electric vehicle technology[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(1):75-93.
[12] HUANG M H, YANG H W, CHEN D Z. Increasing science and technology linkage in fuel cells:a cross citation analysis of papers and patents[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(2):237-249.
[13] 张雪, 张志强, 陈秀娟, 等. 合成生物学领域的基础研究与技术创新关联分析[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(3):231-242.
[14] 高继平, 丁堃, 滕立, 等. 专利-论文混合共被引网络下的知识流动探析[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(8):1184-1189.
[15] WANG G B, GUAN J C. Measuring science-technology interactions using patent citations and author-inventor links:an exploration analysis from Chinese nanotechnology[J]. Journal of nanoparticle research, 2011, 13(12):27-42.
[16] BHATTACHARYA S, MEYER M. Large firms and the science-technology interface Patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2):265-279.
[17] 赖院根. 期刊论文与专利文献的链接研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2011(1):63-69.
[18] 李睿, 容军凤, 张玲玲. 试论"科学-技术关联"计量模型的不足及改进——学科-领域对应优化视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(5):86-93.
[19] XU H Y, WINNINK J, YUE Z H, et al. Topic-linked innovation paths in science and technology[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2020, 14(2):1-18.
[20] 王亚东, 朱林. 基于技术与知识的双螺旋结构创新模式研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017(9):1-7.
[21] YAYAVARAM S, AHUJA G. Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2008, 53(2):333-362.
[22] 吴悦, 顾新, 涂振洲. 基于知识流动的产学研协同创新协同关系的形成过程研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2015(23):87-93.
[23] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Co-citation analysis bibliographic coupling and direct:which citation approach represents the research front most accurately[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 61(12):2389-2404.
[24] 卢超, 侯海燕, DING YING, 等. 国外新兴研究话题发现研究综述[J].情报学报, 2019, 38(1):97-110.
[25] AN L, LIN X, YU C, et al. Measuring and visualizing the contributions of Chinese and American LIS research institutions to emerging themes and salient themes[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3):1605-1634.
[26] 邓启平, 陈卫静, 张玲玲, 等. 基于多维特征测度的人工智能领域研究前沿分析[J].情报杂志, 2020, 39(3):56-62.
[27] 刘小玲, 谭宗颖. 新兴技术主题识别方法研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(11):145-152.
[28] 李欣, 王静静, 杨梓, 等. 基于SAO结构语义分析的新兴技术识别研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(3):80-84.
[29] SMALL H, BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Identifying emerging topics in science and technology[J]. Research policy, 2014, 43(8):1450-1467.
[30] GONZALEZ-ALCAIDE G, LLORENTE P, RAMOS J M. Bibliometric indicators to identify emerging research fields:publications on mass gatherings[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2):1283-1298.
[31] WANG Q. A bibliometric model for identifying emerging research topics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 69(2):290-304.
[32] 李蓓, 陈向东. 基于专利引用耦合聚类的纳米领域新兴技术识别[J]. 情报杂志, 2015(5):35-40.
