THEORETICAL STUDY

Research on the Rights Policies of the Output in Think Tanks——Taking the Output of the World-renowned Think Tanks as an Instance

  • Sun Xueying ,
  • Ma Jianling
Expand
  • 1 Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000;
    2 Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2021-01-06

  Revised date: 2021-04-02

  Online published: 2021-07-21

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] By investigating the rights policies of world-renowned think tanks, this paper provided references for libraries and policy consulting researchers about constructing and using the resources in the think tanks.Moreover,it provides suggestions for China’s new-type think tanks about the rights policies of the output. [Method/process] This paper adopted the network research method, and selected the survey subjects based on the'2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report’ issued by the University of Pennsylvania. This paper comprehensively investigated the rights of think tank output, and classified and summarized the copyrights, release methods, licensing methods, and specific rights regulations of output construction. [Result/conclusion] Suggestions are made for avoiding the rights risk in the construction and use of think tank output, including examining the rights of output in detail, paying attention to the laws of the country or region to which they belong, and referring to the hierarchical and classified think tank output rights management framework proposed in this paper. It is also recommended that China’s new-type think tanks attach importance to the protection of intellectual property rights of output, and draw on the experience of world-renowned think tanks to formulate reasonable output rights policies.

Cite this article

Sun Xueying , Ma Jianling . Research on the Rights Policies of the Output in Think Tanks——Taking the Output of the World-renowned Think Tanks as an Instance[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021 , 65(14) : 40 -49 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.14.005

References

[1] 王莉丽.智力资本:中国智库核心竞争力[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.
[2] 曹健,孙会清,秦荣环,等.国外高校智库成果调查分析与启示[J].情报杂志,2016,35(8):59-64.
[3] 李慧佳,王楠.基于语义关联的智库资源知识组织研究[J].图书与情报,2020(1):120-126.
[4] 章岑.开放资源再利用权益管理研究[D].北京:中国科学院文献情报中心,2017.
[5] 周宏春.中国智库发展现状与促进建议[J].中国经济报告,2017(11):41-49.
[6] 何培育,刘梦雪,蒋启蒙.新型智库知识产权保护问题与对策研究[J].深圳社会科学,2019(5):145-152,159.
[7] 杨再峰,赵晓声,司晓宏,等.对新型高校智库建设的若干思考[J].中国高校科技,2016(7):52-54.
[8] JAMES M.2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report(2020)[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=think_tanks.
[9] 胡薇,吴田,王彦超.《全球智库报告》解析及评价[J].中国社会科学评价,2018(3):116-124,128.
[10] Brookings Institution.Terms and conditions[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.brookings.edu/terms-and-conditions/.
[11] Carnegie Endowment for international peace[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://carnegieendowment.org/.
[12] Center for Strategic and International Studies.Reprint permissions[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.csis.org/reprint-permissions.
[13] Heritage Foundation.Copyright notice[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.heritage.org/article/copyright-notice.
[14] Peterson Institute for International Economics[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.piie.com/terms-use.
[15] Wilson Center[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.wilsoncenter.org/.
[16] Center for American Progress[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.americanprogress.org/about/c3-terms/.
[17] Rand Corporation.Reprint and linking permissions information[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html.
[18] Council on Foreign Relations[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.cfr.org/terms-use.
[19] Cato Institute.Individual liberty,free markets,and peace[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.cato.org/.
[20] Defending Human Rights Worldwide[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.hrw.org/.
[21] American Enterprise Institute[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://www.aei.org/.
[22] Urban Institute.Terms of service[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.urban.org/terms-service.
[23] Atlantic Council.Terms and conditions of use[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/terms-of-use/.
[24] Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.Privacy policy[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.belfercenter.org/privacy-policy.
[25] Konrad-adenauer-stiftung-nutzungsbedingungen[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.kas.de/en/nutzungsbedingungen.
[26] Home:Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung USA and Canada[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.fesdc.org/footer-meta-menu/legal-notice/.
[27] Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Imprint[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/imprint/.
[28] The German Development Institute.Legal notice[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.die-gdi.de/en/legal-notice/.
[29] German Council on Foreign Relations[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://dgap.org/.
[30] Kiel Institute for the World Economy.Legal notice[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.ifw-kiel.de/legal-notice/.
[31] Chatham House[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.chathamhouse.org/terms-and-conditions.
[32] International Institute for Strategic Studies.Terms and conditions[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.iiss.org/terms-and-conditions.
[33] Centre for Economic Policy Research.Terms & conditions for online subscriptions[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://cepr.org/content/terms-conditions-online-subscriptions.
[34] Royal United Services Institute.Legal[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://rusi.org/legal.
[35] Overseas Development Institute[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.odi.org/.
[36] Institute of Development Studies.Disclaimer & cookies[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.ids.ac.uk/disclaimer-cookies/.
[37] Bruegel[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://bruegel.org.
[38] Center for European Policy Studies.Disclaimer[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.ceps.eu/about-ceps/disclaimer/.
[39] Crisis Group.Copyright and trademark notice[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.crisisgroup.org/legal/copyright-and-trademark-notice.
[40] The Japan Institute of International Affairs.Terms of use[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.jiia-jic.jp/en/terms/.
[41] Asian Development Bank.Terms of use[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.adb.org/terms-use#copyright.
[42] Fraser Institute.Terms and conditions[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.fraserinstitute.org/copyright-conditions.
[43] Centre for International Governance Innovation[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.cigionline.org/
[44] Korea Fevelopment Institute[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://www.kdi.re.kr/kdi_eng/main/main.jsp.
[45] Korea Institute International Economic Policy[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://www.kiep.go.kr/eng/sub/howOrder.jsp.
[46] Carnegie Moscow Center-Carnegie Endowment for International Peace[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://carnegie.ru/?lang=en.
[47] Institute of World Economy and International Relations.Official site[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.imemo.ru/en/.
[48] Barelona Centre for International Affairs.Legal notice[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.cidob.org/en/legal_notice.
[49] Real Instituto Elcano.Aviso legal[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_es/inicio/aviso-legal.
[50] Istituto per gli studi di politica internazionale[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://www.ispionline.it/en/.
[51] Istituto Affari Internazionali[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://www.iai.it/it.
[52] French Institute of International Relations.Legal notice[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.ifri.org/en/legal-notice.
[53] Observer Research Foundation.Terms & conditions[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.orfonline.org/terms-conditions/.
[54] Consejo argentino para las relaciones internacionales[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://cari.org.ar/.
[55] Portal FGV-fundação getulio vargas[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://portal.fgv.br/en.
[56] Danish Institute for International Studies[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.diis.dk/en.
[57] Clingendael Institute[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.clingendael.nl/.
[58] Carnegie Middle East Center-Carnegie Endowment for International Peace[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://carnegie-mec.org/?lang=en.
[59] Stockholm Internaional Peace Research Institutees.Terms and conditions[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.sipri.org/about/terms-and-conditions.
[60] Razumkov Centre[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].http://razumkov.org.ua/en/.
[61] Norwegian Institute of International Affairs[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://www.nupi.no/en.
[62] 张书青.知识产权授权许可若干问题浅析[J].电子知识产权,2015(11):18-25.
[63] 黄如花,李楠.开放数据的许可协议类型研究[J].图书馆,2016(8):16-21.
[64] 唐晓萍.数据挖掘与知识发现综述[J].电脑开发与应用,2002(4):31-32,35.
[65] Creative Commons.署名-非商业性使用-相同方式共享4.0协议国际版[EB/OL].[2020-10-22].https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.zh-Hans.
[66] UK Parliament.The copyright and rights in performances (research,education,libraries and archives)regulations 2014[EB/OL].[2021-01-06].https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1372/contents/made.
[67] 宋雅馨.文本与数据挖掘的版权例外——以欧盟版权指令修改草案为视角[J].电子知识产权,2017(6):42-51.
[68] Law no.2016-1321 of october 7,2016,for a digital republic(as amended up to June 22,2018)[EB/OL].[2021-01-06].https://wipolex.wipo.int/zh/text/489517.
Outlines

/