[Purpose/significance] Novelty measurement is an important part of scientific achievement evaluation. This paper aims to propose a method of novelty measurement and innovation type identification of scientific papers based on the combination of question and method. [Method/process] Based on the word frequency principle, this paper calculated the question novelty, method novelty and question-method combination novelty respectively, and then calculated the overall novelty of the paper by weight assignment. In addition, based on the theory of combination innovation, this study proposed four types of innovation from the perspective of scientific paper question-method combination and a method to identify the type of innovation according to the novelty value. [Result/conclusion] Finally, this paper conducts an empirical study based on more than 200,000 ACM papers from 1951 to 2018, and proves that the novelty measurement method and innovation category identification method proposed in this paper are scientific, reasonable and feasible.
Qian Jiajia
,
Luo Zhuoran
,
Lu Wei
. Novelty Measurement and Innovation Type Identification of Scientific Literature Based on Question-Method Combination[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021
, 65(14)
: 82
-89
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.14.010
[1] 新华网.习近平:关于《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议》的说明[EB/OL].[2021-06-01]. http://m.xinhuanet.com/2020-11/03/c_1126693341.htm.
[2] 《科技查新教程》编写组.科技查新教程[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2001.
[3] 尹新天.中国专利法详解[M].北京:知识产权出版社, 2011.
[4] 陈建青.对我国学术论文创新性评审的几点思考[J].青年记者,2013(18):33-35.
[5] NONAKA I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organization science, 1994, 5(1):14-37.
[6] FLEMING L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search[J]. Management science, 2001, 47(1):117-132.
[7] UZZI B, MUKHERJEE S, STRINGER M, et al. Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157):468-472.
[8] MISHRA S, TORVIK V I. Quantifying conceptual novelty in the biomedical literature[EB/OL].[2021-03-01].http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90328.
[9] 陆伟,李鹏程,张国标,等.学术文本词汇功能识别——基于BERT向量化表示的关键词自动分类研究[J].情报学报,2020,39(12):1320-1329.
[10] 杨锋,梁樑,苟清龙,等.同行评议制度缺陷的根源及完善机制[J].科学学研究,2008, 26(3):569-572.
[11] 沈律.科技创新的一般均衡理论——关于科技成果创新度评价的科学计量学分析[J].科学学研究,2003,21(2):205-209.
[12] 逯万辉,苏金燕,余倩.学术成果主题新颖性与学术引用的相关关系研究[J].情报资料工作,2018(6):68-73.
[13] 杨建林,钱玲飞.基于关键词对逆文档频率的主题新颖度度量方法[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(3):99-102.
[14] 任海英,王德营,王菲菲.主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J].图书情报工作, 2017,61(9):87-93.
[15] 杨京,王芳,白如江.一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(17):75-83.
[16] 许丹,徐爽,陈斯斯,等. 基于自然语言词对法的文献主题新颖性探测研究[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(8):130-138.
[17] 逯万辉,谭宗颖.学术成果主题新颖性测度方法研究——基于Doc2Vec和HMM算法[J].数据分析与知识发现,2018,2(3):22-29.
[18] 钱玲飞,杨建林,邓三鸿.人文社会科学学科创新力单指标评价[J].图书与情报,2013(2):93-98.
[19] 熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].郭武军,吕阳,译. 北京:华夏出版社,2015.
[20] GARCIA R,CALANTONE R. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology:a literature review[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2002, 19(2):110-132.
[21] HENDERSON R M, CLARK K B. Architectural innovation:the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1990, 35:9-30.
[22] BOWER J L, CHRISTENSEN C M. Disruptive technologies:catching the wave[J]. Harvard business review, 1995, 73(1):43-53.
[23] 宋子良.基础研究创新分类初探[J].科技管理研究,1995,15(4):27-29.
