[Purpose/significance] There are few researches on meta-theoretical issues such as appearance logic, operation mechanism and basic paradigm of new think tanks with Chinese characteristics in academic circles, so it has strong originality and knowledge contribution to carry out this research. [Method/process] Comprehensive application of knowledge sociology, knowledge politics, management science and Marxist principle knowledge, explains the theoretical logic, time logic, value logic, related operation mechanism and paradigm characteristics of new think tanks with Chinese characteristics. [Result/conclusion] The new type of think tank with Chinese characteristics appears in the specific background of the transformation of knowledge production mode, the renewal of the era context and the value expression of "people-centered" and "a community with a shared future for mankind"; Its practical operation takes knowledge as its essence and core power, and is driven by the dynamic complementarity of knowledge and power and the coupling of knowledge and capital.The new type of think tank with Chinese characteristics enriches and expands the connotation of contemporary think tanks from the perspectives of the dual context of time and space, the two-way dimension of commonality and individuality, and the interactive relationship with governance modernization, forming the preliminary outline and basic paradigm of Chinese think tanks in the new era.
Zhou Xiangzhi
. New Think Tanks with Chinese Characteristics: Appearance Logic, Operation Mechanism and Basic Paradigm[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021
, 65(15)
: 51
-60
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.15.007
[1] 习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会,夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次代表大会上的报告[E].北京:人民出版社,2017.
[2] 吉本斯.知识生产的新模式——当代社会科学与研究的动力学[M].陈洪捷,沈文钦,等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[3] 中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林作编译局.马克思恩格斯文集第8卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.
[4] 中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林作编译局.马克思恩格斯文集第1卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.
[5] 全国干部培训教材编审指导委员组织.全面推进中国特色大国外交[M].北京:人民出版社,2019.
[6] 麻宝斌.公共治理理论与实践[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013.
[7] 中共中央文献研究室.习近平关于社会主义经济建设论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2017.
[8] 郑永和,寇东亮.国家意识形态安全建设中高校智库的功能与实现[J].河南社会科学,2015(12):97-100,124.
[9] 任平.发展中国特色新型智库体系建设世界一流智库强国[J].南京社会科学,2015(11):1-7.
[10] ARNSTEIN S R.A ladder of citizen participation[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1969,4(35):216-224.
[11] 习近平.开放共创繁荣创新引领未来——在博鳌亚洲论坛2018年年会开幕式上的主旨演讲[M].北京:人民出版社,2018.
[12] 中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林作编译局.马克思恩格斯文集第3卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.
[13] 福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴,译.北京:三联书店,1999.
[14] 托夫勒.权力的转移[M].刘江,等译.北京:中共中央党校出版社,1991.
[15] 德里达.德里达访谈录[M].何佩群,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
[16] 姚国宏.权力知识论[D].南京:南京师范大学公共管理学院,2008.
[17] 堺屋太一.知识价值革命[M].北京:东方出版社,1986.
[18] 胡潇.资本介入文化生产的耦合效应[J].中国社会科学,2015(6):45-61.
[19] 中共中央宣传部.关于深入推进国家高端智库建设试点工作的意见(2020-2022年)[Z].中宣发[2020] 6号,2020-3-2.
[20] 王珩.高校智库建设定位[N].人民日报,2016-02-24(7).
[21] 周湘智.中国智库建设行动逻辑[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.
[22] 中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.关于加强中国特色新型智库建设的意见[Z].中办发[2014] 65号,2015-1-20.
[23] 胡鞍钢.建设中国特色新型智库:实践与总结[J].上海行政学院学报,2014(2):4-11.
