Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2021 , Vol. 65 >Issue 15: 91 - 99

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.15.011

Digital Resources Utilization of University Libraries Based on the Perspective of Social Network——Taking Fudan University Library as an Example

  • Yang Xin ,
  • Zhang Min ,
  • Liao Jianlan ,
  • Shao Chengmin
Expand
  • Fudan University Library, Shanghai 200433

Received date: 2021-01-29

  Revised date: 2021-03-24

  Online published: 2021-08-07

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] With the development of digitization and informatization, digital resources are playing an increasingly important role. Understanding the databases usage characteristics of faculties will be beneficial to optimize the construction of digital resources and promote the construction of "double first-class" universities. [Method/process] This paper selected Fudan University Library (FUL) as the research object to explore the relevance of databases utilization in library, subjects and facultiesthrough the methods of questionnaire survey, social network and cluster analysis by Leiden algorithm. [Result/conclusion] The results indicate that the homogeneous departments and databases are formed a cluster, the evolution of interdiscipline promotes the usage of specialized databases by the researchers from other major. In the future construction of E-resources, libraries can optimize the procurement of E-resources and discipline service according to the combination of cluster characteristics of disciplines and departments in the utilization of E-resources, and the statistical result based on COUNTER.

Key words： social network analysis; digital resources; leiden algorithm; cluster analysis; resource construction

Cite this article

Yang Xin , Zhang Min , Liao Jianlan , Shao Chengmin . Digital Resources Utilization of University Libraries Based on the Perspective of Social Network——Taking Fudan University Library as an Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021 , 65(15) : 91 -99 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.15.011

References

[1] 国务院关于印发统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设总体方案的通知[EB/OL].[2020-12-31]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-11/05/content_10269.htm.
[2] 黄宗忠. 图书馆学导论[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2013:19.
[3] 刘传斌,杨健安,刘昕民. 高校电子文献资源建设现状、问题及对策[J].中国高校科技,2020(7):27-29.
[4] 吴建中. 数字化转型——大学图书馆下一步发展的重心[J].图书馆理论与实践,2019(8):13-17.
[5] 蔡颖,蔡迎春. 后疫情时代大学图书馆数字资源建设的转型与思考[J].数字图书馆论坛,2020(10):11-17.
[6] 肖珑,张宇红. 电子资源评价指标体系的建立初探[J].大学图书馆学报,2002,20(3):35-42.
[7] 罗祺姗,翟爽,张静. 电子资源订购决策评价的若干思考——以中国科学院电子资源集团采购为例[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(3):39-44.
[8] 李朝阳,庞弘燊,覃筱楚. 基于资源效益评价的采购策略制定——以中国科学院研究所图书馆为例[J].图书馆理论与实践,2020(3):50-54.
[9] 漆月,石璐. 基于动态规划的电子资源采购决策支持模型研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2020(11):27-32.
[10] 昝栋,庞萍. 高校图书馆电子资源综合评价指标体系优化研究[J].图书馆建设,2020(S1):278-281.
[11] 毕艳芳,李泰峰. 用户数据维度的数字资源评价方法及实例——以电子科技大学图书馆为例[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(22):82-88.
[12] 陈娟,萧德洪. 电子资源管理系统的应用与思考——以厦门大学图书馆ERNS的应用为例[J].大学图书馆学报,2019(2):55-61, 96.
[13] 张计龙,殷沈琴,汪东伟. 基于counter的电子资源使用统计中的标准问题探讨与研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2016(5):95-100.
[14] 刁羽,贺意林. 用户访问电子资源行为数据的获取研究——基于创文图书馆电子资源综合管理与利用系统[J].图书馆学研究,2020(3):40-47.
[15] 朱玲,崔海媛. 高校图书馆电子资源使用监控与统计系统数据获取质量评估方法探讨[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(5):51-57.
[16] 张赟玥,秦鸿. Counter 5规范解析与特征分析[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(7):47-55.
[17] 杨巍,叶仁杰,吴元业,等. COUNTER release 5的新特征及其应用研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2020(1):18-25, 41.
[18] The COUNTER code of practice for release 5[EB/OL].[2021-03-17]. https://www.projectcounter.org/code-of-practice-five-sections/5-delivery-counter-reports/.
[19] 罗孟儒,袁小一. 电子资源利用行为数据获取模式比较研究[J].图书馆学研究,2019(18):63-68.
[20] 胡大琴. 中文数字资源使用统计数据的调查研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(15):104-110.
[21] 刘慧,陆康,夏莹. 智慧服务背景下图书馆用户数字资源使用行为分析研究[J].新世纪图书馆,2020(8):62-67.
[22] 倪劼. 图书馆数字资源访问统计系统构建研究——基于OpenResty平台[J].图书馆工作与研究,2019(10):75-82.
[23] OBANDE B O, OSAKWE J, UJAKPA M M, et al. Awareness, accessibility and usability of E-resources:university students perspective[C]//IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa). Kampala, Uganda:IEEE, 2020:1-9.
[24] SONI N K, RANI S, KUMAR A, et al. Evaluation of usage of E-resources and INMAS Library services through user's perspective:an analytical study[J]. Journal of library and information technology, 2020, 40(4):238-246.
[25] MATTERN E, JENG W, HE D, et al. Using participatory design and visual narrative inquiry to investigate researchers' data challenges and recommendations for library research data services[J]. Program:electronic library and information systems, 2015, 49(4):408-423.
[26] COX N S. No mind reading necessary:conducting evidence-based electronic resource marketing and outreach using marketing research assessment[J]. Serials review, 2019, 45(3SI):148-149.
[27] ATILGAN D, ATAKAN C, GULTEKIN V, et al. Evaluation of the electronic resource usage of Ankara Uuniversity faculty members[J]. Turkish librarianship, 2020, 34(1):29-45.
[28] ATILGAN D, BAYRAM O G. Perspectives on…an evaluation of faculty use of the digital library at Ankara University, Turkey[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2006, 32(1):86-93.
[29] 王剑,屠媛媛. 数字图书馆情境下科研用户知识采纳行为影响因素实证研究[J].情报探索,2020(3):35-40.
[30] ABDUL RAHMAN A R, MOHEZAR S. Ensuring continued use of a digital library:a qualitative approach[J]. The electronic library, 2020, 38(3):513-530.
[31] SALDANHA I J, LI T, YANG C, et al. Social network analysis identified central outcomes for core outcome sets using systematic reviews of HIV/AIDS[J]. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016, 70:164-175.
[32] SONG R, XU H, CAI L. Academic collaboration in entrepreneurship research from 2009 to 2018:a multilevel collaboration network analysis[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(19):5172.
[33] DING Y, YAN E, FRAZHO A, et al. PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(11):2229-2243.
[34] WANG H, SUN B, WANG P. Dominant technology identification model based on patent information toward sustainable energy development[J]. IEEE access, 2019(7):141374-141385.
[35] ZHONG B, HEI Y, LI H, et al. Patent cooperative patterns and development trends of Chinese construction enterprises:a network analysis[J]. Journal of civil engineering and management, 2019, 25(3):228-240.
[36] TRAAG V A, WALTMAN L, van ECK N J. From Louvain to Leiden:Guaranteeing well-connected communities[J]. Scientific reports, 2019, 9(1):5233.
[37] ASATANI K, TAKEDA H, YAMANO H, et al. Scientific attention to sustainability and SDGs:meta-analysis of academic papers[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(4):975.
[38] 范磊,张远. 社交网络分析中的图布局算法综述[J].信息与电脑,2017(13):62-64.
[39] 于丰畅,陆伟. 关键词共现网络视角下的学科基础词汇发现[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(9):95-100.
[40] 复旦大学大气与海洋科学系. 院系简介[EB/OL].[2020-12-09]. https://aos.fudan.edu.cn/about_us/list.htm.
[41] 王卓妮,石长慧. 2008-2017年国家自然科学基金大气科学领域资助项目综合分析[J].科技导报,2019,37(24):79-88.
[42] WANG S, CHEN C, YU Z, et al. A MoS2/PTCDA hybrid heterojunction synapse with efficient photoelectric dual modulation and versatility[J]. Advanced materials, 2018, 31(3):1806227.
[43] WANG T, MENG J, RAO M, et al. Three-Dimensional nanoscale flexible memristor networks with ultralow power for information transmission and processing application[J]. Nano letters, 2020, 20(6):4111-4120.
[44] 复旦大学大气与海洋科学系. 复旦大学获批设立国际灾害风险综合研究计划国际卓越中心[EB/OL].[2020-12-04].https://atmsci.fudan.edu.cn/d6/0b/c16028a251403/page.htm.
[45] 袁翀,褚怡春. 近十年我国自然科学与社会科学的交叉融合研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(21):10-13.
[46] 原帅,黄宗英,贺飞. 交叉与融合下学科建设的思考——以北京大学为例[J].中国高校科技,2019(12):4-7.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.