Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2021 , Vol. 65 >Issue 17: 26 - 32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.17.003

THEORETICAL STUDY

Field Change and Value Chain Reconstruction of Academic Information Exchange in the Background of Open Access

  • Ding Jingda ,
  • Ye Chenyang ,
  • Tang Sijia
Expand
  • Department of Library, Information and Archives, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444

Received date: 2021-03-21

  Revised date: 2021-06-06

  Online published: 2021-09-01

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Studying the field change and value chain reconstruction of academic information exchange in the background of open access is conducive to optimizing the ecology of academic information exchange and improving the efficiency of academic information exchange.[Method/process] This paper analyzed the relationship change among the subjects of academic information exchange in the background of open access by using of the field theory in Sociology, and further discussed its influence on the value chain of academic information exchange.[Result/conclusion] With the open access, the field of academic information exchange presents the trend of multi-agent. Based on the space of mutual integration and collaboration, this paper proposes and constructs two reconstruction models of academic information exchange value chain:single subject value chain integration and multi-agent value chain collaboration.

Key words： open access; academic exchange; field theory; value chain reconstruction

Cite this article

Ding Jingda , Ye Chenyang , Tang Sijia . Field Change and Value Chain Reconstruction of Academic Information Exchange in the Background of Open Access[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021 , 65(17) : 26 -32 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.17.003

References

[1] PORTER M E. Competitive strategy[J]. Measuring business excellence, 1997, 1(2):12-17.
[2] 宋冬英.网络时代学术期刊的价值链重构[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学, 版), 2006, 33(2):216-218.
[3] 杨志华.学术期刊价值链研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2013, 24(4):645-649.
[4] 于春生.数字期刊产业价值链优化与发展策略[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2015.
[5] 王鹏涛, 李梦连.移动出版价值链研究的现状与学术构想[J]. 浙江传媒学院学报, 2018, 25(5):77-82, 134.
[6] 严玲艳, 王一鸣, 肖钠.基于学术社交平台的学术出版价值链延伸[J]. 情报资料工作, 2019, 40(6):44-50.
[7] 彭彦.传统出版企业的数字化盈利之路:路径依赖与产业链延伸的博弈[J]. 出版发行研究, 2014(10):33-35.
[8] 杨淼.延伸产业链提升价值链——科技出版社知识服务供给侧改革路径创新[J]. 中国出版, 2020(19):56-58.
[9] 练小川.爱思唯尔的价值链延伸[J]. 出版科学, 2020, 28(2):22-28.
[10] 刘凯军.系统创新延伸价值链[N]. 中国出版传媒商报, 2019-11-12(002).
[11] 张新华, 王炜璠."出版+文创":以核心资源为基础的出版价值链延伸[J]. 出版广角, 2017(22):10-12.
[12] 陈昕.中国出版业的转型与发展[J]. 印刷杂志, 2015(1):9-11.
[13] 吴薇薇.科普类期刊品牌经营的调查分析[J]. 科学咨询(决策管理), 2009(5):60-61.
[14] 彭彦.传统出版企业的数字化盈利之路:路径依赖与产业链延伸的博弈[J]. 出版发行研究, 2014(10):33-35.
[15] Affiliation:European Commission. Future of scholarly publishing and scholarly communication:report of the expert group to the European Commission[J/OL]. [2021-02-11]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330907948_Future_of_scholarly_publishing_and_scholarly_communication_Report_of_the_Expert_Group_to_the_European_Commission.
[16] ROOSENDAAL H E, HUIBERS T W C, GEURTS P A M, et al. Changes in the value chain of scientific information:economic consequences for academic institutions[J]. Online information review, 2003, 27(2):120-128.
[17] CHEN G, POSADA A. Vertical integration in academic publishing[J/OL]. [2021-01-24]. https://books.openedition.org/oep/9068.
[18] MERCER H, DYAS-CORREIA S. Metadata value chain for Open-Access E-journals[J]. The serials librarian, 2011, 60(1/4):234-240.
[19] 布尔迪厄传[M]. 陈秀萍, 译.北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2021.
[20] 甄巍然, 陈昌辉."场域"视角下出版伦理困境探因与路径建构[J]. 出版发行研究, 2017(7):11-15.
[21] 许洁, 马青青.场域理论视角下的开放获取S计划及其影响研究[J]. 出版科学, 2019, 27(4):99-104.
[22] POSADA A, CHEN G.Inequality in knowledge production:the integration of academic infrastructure by big publishers[J/OL]. [2021-03-16]. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01816707/.
[23] 李麟, 初景利.开放获取出版模式研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2005(6):88-93.
[24] HARNAD S, BRODY T. Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals[J]. D-lib magazine, 2004, 10(6):1082-9873.
[25] 韩文, 刘畅, 雷秋雨.分析学术社交网络对科研活动的辅助作用——以ResearchGate和Academia.edu为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(8):105-111.
[26] 顾立平.开放数据计量研究综述:计算网络用户行为和科学社群影响力的Altmetrics计量[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013(6):1-8.
[27] 吴建中.追求同步:图书馆新一轮发展的机遇与挑战[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(12):4-10.
[28] UCLPRESS[EB/OL]. [2021-06-04]. https://www.uclpress.co.uk/?query=dutch&orderby=relevance.
[29] 任翔.开放生态改变出版规则:2019年欧美开放获取发展评述[J]. 科技与出版, 2020(3):28-34.
[30] Plan S making full and immediate open access a reality[EB/OL]. [2021-06-04]. https://www.coalition-s.org/.
[31] ESAC[EB/OL]. [2021-06-04]. https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/.
[32] 黄如花, 冯晴.论开放存取出版对科学信息交流和利用的影响[J]. 出版科学, 2008(3):75-78.
[33] 徐丽芳.科学交流系统的要素、结构、功能及其演进[J]. 图书情报知识, 2008(6):114-117.
[34] 陈洁, 蒋三军.以用户驱动为导向的学术社交网络重构策略[J]. 中国编辑, 2020(10):70-74.
[35] ESAC.Transformative agreements[EB/OL]. [2020-12-20]. https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative -agreements/.
[36] BORREGO Á, ANGLADA L, ABADAL E. Transformative agreements:do they pave the way to open access?[J/OL]. [2021-01-06]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/leap.1347.
[37] 蔡万刚, 王艺霖, 郑建国."互联网+"环境下考虑知识价值链的企业服务创新研究[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2016, 23(2):42-51.
[38] POSADA A, CHEN G. Inequality in knowledge production:the integration of academic infrastructure by big publishers[J/OL]. [2021-03-01]. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01816707/.
[39] 白国应.中国科学院文献信息网络建设的回顾与展望[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 1996, 22(103):56-62.
[40] 教育部科技部印发《关于规范高等学校SCI论文相关指标使用树立正确评价导向的若干意见》的通知[EB/OL]. [2021-06-05]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-03/03/content_5486229.htm.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.