THEORETICAL STUDY

Risk Analysis and Modification Suggestions of Digital Resource License Agreement Terms from the Perspective of Judicial Practice

  • Gu Wenhao ,
  • Li Honggang ,
  • Zhang Libin
Expand
  • Nankai University Library, Tianjin 300350

Received date: 2021-04-07

  Revised date: 2021-06-07

  Online published: 2021-09-26

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Digital resources have gradually become the leading role in the construction of document resources in academic libraries. It is essential to identify high-risk clauses in the license agreements of digital resources from the perspective of judicial practice and to propose amendments to the introduction and use of digital resources.[Method/process] By using case analysis, we sorted out typical verdicts from China Judicial Document Website and Non-Litigation Website, examined potential infringements of libraries,such as remote access without domain jump, directional links, do not conform to the reasonable use, copy digital resource to the local server through mirror technology, and identified high-risk clauses related to these infringements.[Result/conclusion] Suggestions are put forward for modification of high-risk agreement clauses from the perspective of judicial practice:for remote access, authorized users should be expanded and deep links should be reduced; literature transmission should strive for electronic paper simultaneous transmission, and abide by the restrictions; long-term preservation should be clear preservation mode, and strive for deep utilization.

Cite this article

Gu Wenhao , Li Honggang , Zhang Libin . Risk Analysis and Modification Suggestions of Digital Resource License Agreement Terms from the Perspective of Judicial Practice[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021 , 65(18) : 15 -23 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.18.002

References

[1] 程文艳, 孙坦, 黄国彬. 电子资源许可协议典型研究项目的分析及其启示[J]. 情报资料工作, 2008(5):47-50.
[2] LIBLICENSE. Welcome to the LIBLⅡCENSE Project[EB/OL]. [2021-03-12]. http://www.liblicense.crl.edu.
[3] 程文艳, 孙坦, 黄国彬. 电子资源许可协议模型研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008, 52(8):109-112, 42.
[4] 唐琼. 国外数字资源许可协议模板研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2011(5):41-44.
[5] LIBLICENSE. Model licenses[EB/OL]. [2021-03-12].http://www.liblicense.crl.edu/licensing-information/model-license/.
[6] CDL. Standard license agreement[EB/OL]. [2021-03-12].http://www.cdlib.org/services/collections/licensed/toolkit/.
[7] 向佳丽, 张静, 周红. 国外图书馆数字资源许可政策新近发展研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2020(1):26-34.
[8] RODRIGUEZ M. Negotiating accessibility for electronic resources[J]. Serials review, 2020, 46(2):150-156.
[9] ZHANG M, ESCHENFELDER K. License analysis on e-journal perpetual access of library[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 2013, 40(1):62-69.
[10] BULOCK C. Tracking perpetual access:a survey of librarian practices[J]. Serials review, 2014, 40(2):97-104.
[11] 陈英敏. 美国数字资源长期保存发展研究[J]. 情报探索, 2017(6):79-85.
[12] 柴会明. 图书馆数字资源长期保存的目标、原则与策略——基于英美德澳4国国家图书馆数字保存战略的分析[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2020(14):57-62, 75.
[13] MANGIARACINA S, RUSSO O, TUGNOLI A. To each his own:how to provide a library user with an article respecting licence agreements[J]. Interlending & document supply, 2015, 43(4):199-206.
[14] MURPHY J A. Ebook sharing models in academic libraries[J]. Serials review, 2019, 45(3):176-183.
[15] KLUZEK M. A practical guide to e-journal and e-book supply-a UK perspective[J]. Interlending & document supply, 2014, 42(1):13-15.
[16] MOWER A. Opportunities for eTextbook innovations and partnerships:a case study of the Marriott Library at the University of Utah[J]. Learned publishing, 2021(34):30-34.
[17] RUBEL A, ZHANG M. Four facts of privacy and intellectual freedom in licensing contracts for electronic journals[J]. College & research libraries, 2015, 76(4):427-449.
[18] IFLA. IFLA data protection policy[EB/OL]. [2021-06-05].https://www.ifla.org/data-protection-policy/full-text.
[19] 吴高, 杨颖. 国外重要数字资源许可协议条款比较研究[J]. 图书馆, 2015(6):71-76.
[20] 向佳丽, 庄玉友. 电子资源许可协议核心条款的分析与风险应对[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016(16):73-78, 85.
[21] 胡芳, 钟永恒. 电子资源许可协议对文献传递服务的影响及应对策略[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2007(11):27-29, 5.
[22] 朱如龙. 高校图书馆数字资源长期保存的著作权问题研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(7):23-29.
[23] 赵保颖, 范雪. 国内外数字资源统计标准比较分析[J]. 图书与情报, 2010(6):39-43, 85.
[24] 高校图书馆数字资源采购联盟. 高校图书馆数字资源采购联盟工作规范(2018年修订)[EB/OL]. [2021-03-23]. http://www.libconsortia.edu.cn/Spage/view.action?pagecode=glgf_2.
[25] 李佳, 张静, 邵晶.基于DRAA集团采购的数字资源许可协议内容调查与认知度研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019(3):28-34.
[26] 王洪华. 高校集团订购协议的文本解析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(22):28-32, 47.
[27] 张静. 国外电子资源授权许可协议法律适用问题研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(18):36-40.
[28] 张静. 数字资源国际许可使用的法律问题研究[J]. 现代情报, 2017(4):9-12, 26.
[29] 黄国彬. 数字环境下图书馆享有的著作权例外空间研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2008(6):4-7.
[30] 刘赪娜. 我国图书馆著作权例外适用及风险应对研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2015(8):43-45.
[31] 刘赪娜. 我国图书馆信息网络传播权例外适用及著作权风险应对策略[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2016(2):20-22, 84.
[32] 李秋容. 大数据时代图书馆著作权例外制度的挑战与重构[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2019(7):10-14, 49.
[33] 向佳丽. 图书馆数据库订购合同的法律风险防范[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2016(1):57-61, 83.
[34] 王果, 张立彬. 网络时代图书馆著作权侵权案件的案例分析与法律思考[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(8):29-37.
[35] 王果, 张立彬. 挑战、困境与化解:数字环境下我国图书馆合理使用条款及其适用的再探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(10):5-11.
[36] 王果, 张立彬. 面向发展的图书馆著作权侵权诉讼趋势及其风险规避策略研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020(3):87-92.
[37] 高翡. 定向链接服务提供者侵权的认定[J]. 人民司法, 2019(9):84-86.
[38] 张惠彬, 王欣怡. 如何判定侵害信息网络传播权的行为?——基于"服务器标准"和"用户感知标准"的比较[J]. 新闻界, 2018(11):42-47.作者贡献说明:谷文浩:负责数据调研与论文撰写; 李红钢:指导论文写作、提出修改意见; 张立彬:指导选题, 负责体系架构、通稿定稿。
Outlines

/