[Purpose/significance] This paper reviews the exploration process of library information resources sharing t after Farmington Plan, analyzes the deep value significance of cooperative collection and collective collection, and determines the anchor point for the research and practice of library information resources development in China in the new era. [Method/process] The study reviewed the two "milestones" in the process of library information sharing since the 1940s:cooperative collection and collective collection, revealed the value significance behind them, and analyzed how these value promote cooperative collection to collective collection. [Result/conclusion] The study found that, the Farmington Plan laid the foundation for the development of early cooperative collection from three aspects:goal orientation, connotation setting and realization approach; in the 1970s and 1990s, the exploration of cooperative collection experienced the reflection of "highly altruistic" and "synergism cooperative collection", and completed the transformation of "respecting members' interests" and "complementary cooperative collection". At the beginning of the 21st century, under the goal guidance of data-driven and highlighting the benefits of cooperation, the cooperative collection turned to the collective collection. These values have enlightening effects on the practice of library information development in China:strengthening the strategic support role of library information resources construction, pursuing the win-win concept of more accurate and more collaborative, and highlighting the efficiency orientation of data empowerment.
Zhang Kang
,
Li Zhuozhuo
. Research from Cooperative Collection to Collective Collection: Reflections After 80 Years of Farmington Plan[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021
, 65(20)
: 31
-41
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.20.004
[1] DEMPSEY L,MALPAS C,LAVIOE B.Collection directions:the evolution of library collections and collecting[J].Portal:libraries and the academy,2014,14(3):393-423.
[2] NANCY E. OCLC research:past, present and future[J]. Journal of library administration,2009,49(7):5-11.
[3] CLEMENT S,SUSANNE K.From collaborative purchasing towards collaborative discarding:the evolution of the shared print repository[J].Collection management,2012,37(3/4):153-167.
[4] DEMPSEY L.Library collections in the life of the user:two firections[J].Liber quarterly,2016,26(4):332-338.
[5] VOSPER R. Farmingtion redivivus:the years of co-ordinated foreign book procurement in the U.S.[J].Library journal,1959,11(2):327-334.
[6] GIBB I P. Foreign book procuremen:the decennial Farmington Plan survey and afterwards[J]. Journal of documentation,1960,16(1):1-9.
[7] 王劲松,梁丽.中美信息资源共建共享政府行为比较研究[J].新世纪图书馆,2009,37(1):26-28.
[8] EDELMAN H H. The death of the Farmington Plan[J]. Library journal, 1973,17(5):25-32.
[9] SHELTON C Y. Best practices in cooperative collection development[J]. Collection management,2008,28(3):191-222.
[10] SOHN J. Cooperative collection development[J].Collection management, 1986,8(2):1-10.
[11] 郭晓红.基于分布式合作储存的印本馆藏共享机制研究——以美国缅因州共享印本馆藏项目实践为例[J].图书馆理论与实践,2017(2):49-53.
[12] 郭晓红.图书馆转型下的学术印本资源分布式区域合作储存研究——以美国西部学术资源区域合作储存实践为例[J].情报资料工作,2017(4):68-74.
[13] DANNELLY G Y. The center for research libraries and cooperative collection development[J].Collection management,1998,23(4):37-45.
[14] MALLERY M, THEU S. New frontiers in collaborative collection management[J]. Technical services quarterly,2012,29(2):101-112.
[15] BOSCH S, LYONS L. Measuring success of cooperative collection development[J]. Collection management,2004,28(3):223-239.
[16] KIEFT R H, PAYNE L. Collective collection, collective action[J]. Collection management, 2012,37(3):137-152.
[17] DEMAS S, Miller E M. Rethinking collection management plans:hoping collective collections for the 21st century[J]. Collection management, 2012,37:(3):168-187.
[18] GARSKOF J, MORRIS J. Towards the collective collection:lessons learned from PALCI's DDA pilot projects and next steps[J]. Collaborative librarianship, 2016, 8(2):3-7.
[19] HRLWN N L.Michigan shared print initiative and Green Glass for groups for data analysis in developing a collaborative collective collection[J] Document delivery & electronic reserve, 2014,25(3):89-105.
[20] BAKKER T. Resource sharing in Dutch academic libraries[J]. Resource sharing & information networks,1998,13(2):15-27.
[21] 王红霞.学术图书馆联盟集体馆藏建设研究——以十大学术联盟为例[J].图书馆学研究,2020(15):71-77.
[22] 许炜,李卓卓."双一流"背景下数据驱动的高校图书馆集体馆藏与精准合作研究[J].图书馆学研究,2020(21):23-31.
[23] MIRSKY L. From Farmington Plan to the Pacific Rim Digital Library Alliance[J] Collection management,1999,24(13):241-250.
[24] 周晓英,崔佳佳,唐宇萍,等.情报学的起源与方向——从布什的《诚如所思》谈起[J].情报科学,2004(2):129-132.
[25] WOLFGANG M. Cooperative collection development and resource sharing among art libraries:past and present[J].Art libraries journal,1986(11):19-32.
[26] 上海地区文献资源共享协作网华东师范大学信息学系联合课题组.美国图书馆信息资源共享的历史与现状[J].图书馆杂志,1999(10):19-22.
[27] TERENCE K. Collaborative collection development comes of age[J].Computers in libraries,2015,35(3):25-27.
[28] DEMPSEY D. A history of the Farmington Plan[J].Libraries & Culture,2004(4):473-475.
[29] KENNETH S. Warren the evolution of selective biomedical libraries and their use in the developing world[J].The journal of the American Medical Association,1987,257(19):67-71.
[30] 龙旭梅,王先林.美国合作藏书建设的发展综述[J].中华医学图书馆杂志,2000,36(5):17-21.
[31] 肖希明.藏书发展模式的选择:拥有还是存取?[J].图书馆论坛,2002,22(1):56-59.
[32] DEMPSEY L. The emergence of the collective collection:analyzing aggregate print library holdings[M].Dublin, OH:OCLC Research,2013:8.
[33] LAVOIE B,DEMPSEY L,MALPAS C. Reflections on collective collections[J].College & research libraries,2020,81(6):112-131.
[34] DEMPSEY L,MALPAS C,SANDLER M. Operationalizing the BIG collective collection:a case study of consolidation vs autonomy[EB/OL].[2021-01-13].https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/119.
[35] MALPAS C,LAVOIE B. Strength in numbers:the research libraries UK(RLUK)collective collection[EB/OL].[2020-05-28].http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2016/oclcresearch-strength-in-numbers-rluk-collective-collection-2016-a4.pdf.
[36] OCLC.FAST(Faceted application of subject terminology)[EB/OL].[2021-01-13].https://www.oclc.org/research/areas/data-science/fast.html.
[37] 刘兹恒.图书馆文献资源建设的过去和未来[N].新华书目报,2020-12-25(025).
[38] KIEFT B A. College library, its print monograph collection and the new information ecology[J].Against the grain,2014,22(5):7-10.
[39] 叶继元.聚焦学科核心领域,重构文献信息资源保障体系[J].图书与情报,2020(5):1-8.
[40] 郭晶.赋能存量,做优增量,把握变量——面向"十四五"的国内高校图书馆文献信息资源建设思考[J].图书情报工作, 2021,65(1):47-54.
[41] 曾建勋.开放融合环境下NSTL资源建设的发展思考[J].大学图书馆学报,2020,38(6):63-70.
[42] DING J,YU S,WANG H,et al. Member structure and sharing behavior:social network analysis of CALIS online cataloging data in China[J]. The journal of academic librarianship,2020,46(2):102-115.
[43] 裴成发,温芳芳. 国外图书馆联盟信息资源建设制度研究进展(2005-2014)[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(15):122-132.
[44] LAVOIE B. The US and Canadian collective print book collection:A 2019 snapshot[EB/OL].[2021-04-07].https://www.oclc.org/research/publications/2019/oclcresearch-us-and-canadian-collective-print-book-collection-2019.html.
