[Purpose/significance] Exploring the diffusion and influence of Wilson information behavior model, that is how each component of the model is cited by other literatures, is to reflect the interdisciplinary characteristics of user information behavior research. [Method/process] The methods of citation analysis and content analysis were used to reveal the cited situation of the model in time dimension, literature type and discipline dimension and the co-occurrence relationship of the model concepts, which were displayed visually by using Gephi. [Result/conclusion] Firstly, the influence of Wilson information behavior model is increasing with time, and it tends to be cited by empirical papers. Secondly, due to the interdisciplinary perspective of the model, it has obvious influence in non-library information fields, such as social science, computer science and medicine. Finally, papers citing the model pay attention to the discussion of the content of the model, all aspects of the model have spread to varying degrees, but these papers lack in-depth analysis.
[1] VAN M J. Different strokes:qualitative research in the administrative science quarterly from 1956 to 1996[M]. London:SAGE Publications, 1998.
[2] VAKKARI P, KUOKKANEN M. Theory growth in information science:applications of the theory of science to a theory of information seeking[J]. Journal of documentation, 1997, 53(5):497-519.
[3] BROOKES B C. The foundations of information science:part I. philosophical aspects[J]. Journal of information science, 1980, 2(3/4):125-133.
[4] HOUSER L. A conceptual analysis of information science[J]. Library and information science research, 1988, 10(1):3-34.
[5] WILSON T D. Human information behavior[J]. Informing science the international journal of an emerging transdiscipline, 2000, 3(2):49-56.
[6] 潘颖, 郑建明. 多学科视角下国外用户信息行为研究述评[J]. 图书馆, 2019(9):67-74.
[7] TAYLOR R S. Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries[J]. Journal of college and research libraries, 1968, 29(3):178-194.
[8] WILSON T D. On user studies and information needs[J]. Journal of librarianship, 1981, 37(1):3-15.
[9] WILSON T D. Information behaviour:an interdisciplinary perspective[J]. Information processing and management, 1997, 33(4):551-572.
[10] KUHLTHAU C C. Inside the search process:information seeking from the user's perspective[J]. Journal of the American society for information science, 1991, 42(5):361-371.
[11] SAVOLAINEN R. Everyday life information seeking:approaching information seeking in the context of "way of life"[J]. Library and information science research, 1995, 17(3):259-294.
[12] 侯剑华, 郑碧丽, 张洋. 科学知识扩散研究:概念界定、理论基础与体系重构[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(9):117-126.
[13] SOHEILI F, KHASSEH A A, MOUSAVI-CHELAK A. The most influential researchers in information behaviour:an integrative view on influence indicators[J]. Aslib journal of information management:new information perspectives, 2017, 69(2):215-229.
[14] 宋歌. 学术创新的扩散过程研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(1):62-75.
[15] 王静静, 叶鹰. 国际数字人文研究中的跨学科知识扩散探析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2021, 39(2):45-51,61.
[16] 杨瑞仙, 孙富杰, 石凤娟. 从期刊文献引证视角看学科结构与知识演变:以档案学为例[J]. 档案管理, 2018(2):69-73.
[17] WILSON T D. The transfer of theories and models from information behaviour research into other disciplines[J]. Information research, 2020, 25(3):1-23.
[18] STREMERSCH S, CAMACHO N, VANNESTE S, et al. Unraveling scientific impact:citation types in marketing journals[J]. International journal of research in marketing, 2015, 32(1):64-77.
[19] MCKECHNIE L E F, SERANTES L C, HOFFMAN C. Dancing around the edges:the use of postmodern approaches in information behaviour research as evident in the published proceedings of the biennial ISIC conferences, 1996-2010[J]. Information research, 2012, 17(4):94-105.
[20] GONZÁLEZ-TERUEL A, PÉREZ-PULIDO M. The diffusion and influence of theoretical models of information behaviour. The case of Savolainen's ELIS model[J]. Journal of documentation, 2020, 76(5):1069-1089.
[21] DEWEY S H. (Non-)use of foucault's archaeology of knowledge and order of things in LIS journal literature, 1990-2015[J]. Journal of documentation, 2016, 72(3):454-489.
[22] 侯剑华, 王仲禹. 研究主题的知识流动测度及其实证分析——以H指数研究为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(10):87-93.
[23] KIM S J, JEONG D Y. An analysis of the development and use of theory in library and information science research articles[J]. Library and information science research, 2006, 28(4):548-562.
[24] WANG F, WANG X. Tracing theory diffusion:a text mining and citation-based analysis of TAM[J]. Journal of documentation, 2020, 76(6):1109-1134.
[25] SAVOLAINEN R. Contributions to conceptual growth:the elaboration of Ellis's model for information-seeking behavior[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(3):594-608.
[26] WILSON T D. The diffusion of information behaviour research across disciplines[C]//Proceedings of ISIC:the information behaviour conference. Krakow:POLAND, 2018:4-23.
[27] LUND B D. The citation impact of information behavior theories in scholarly literature[J]. Library and information science research, 2019, 41(45):1-6.
[28] CHANG Y W. The influence of Taylor's paper, question-negotiation and information-seeking in libraries[J]. Information processing and management, 2013, 49(5):983-994.
[29] GONZALEZ-TERUEL A, ABAD-GARCIA F. The influence of Elfreda Chatman's theories:a citation context analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(3):1793-1819.
[30] 岳增慧, 许海云. 学科引证网络知识扩散特征研究[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(1):1-12.
[31] ZHANG G, DING Y, MILOJEVIC S. Citation content analysis (CCA):a framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(7):1490-1503.
[32] SAVOLAINEN R. Conceptual growth in integrated models for information behaviour[J]. Journal of documentation, 2016, 72(4):648-673.
[33] CRAMER E M. Health information behavior of expectant and recent fathers[J]. American journal of mens health, 2016, 12(2):313-325.
[34] BONZI S. Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works[J]. Journal of the American society for information science, 2007, 33(4):208-216.
[35] BERGET G, MACFARLANE A, PHARO N. Modelling the information seeking and searching behaviour of users with impairments:are existing models applicable?[J]. Journal of documentation, 2020, 77(2):381-400.
[36] INGWERSEN P, JARVELIN K. The turn:integration of information seeking and retrieval in context[M]. Dordrecht:Springer, 2005.
[37] ELDAKAR M, KENAWY Y M. Researchers emotions after information retrieval from databases available through the Egyptian Knowledge Bank:impacts of perceived self-efficacy[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2020, 46(5):102173.
[38] KHOSROWJERDI M. National culture and trust in online health information[J]. Journal of librarianship and information science, 2020, 52(2):509-528.
[39] MIERZECKA A, SUMINAS A. Academic library website functions in the context of users' information needs[J]. Journal of librarianship and information science, 2018, 50(2):1-11.
[40] ROBSON A, ROBINSON L. Building on models of information behaviour:linking information seeking and communication[J]. Journal of documentation, 2013, 69(2):169-193.
[41] KOSTAGIOLAS P, TSILIGROS P, THEODOROU P, et al. A cross-sectional survey interconnecting health information seeking behavior with clinical data of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients[J]. Library hi tech, 2020, 39(2):448-461.
[42] LUJALA P, BRUNNSCHWEILER C, EDJEKUNHENE I. Transparent for whom? dissemination of information on Ghana's petroleum and mining revenue management[J]. Journal of development studies, 2020, 56(12):2135-2153.
[43] BUCNANAN S, JARDINE C. The complex information needs of disadvantaged young first-time mothers:insights into multiplicity of needs[J]. Journal of documentation, 2020, 76(6):1135-1153.
[44] BARAHMAND N, NAKHODA M, FAHIMAIA F, et al. Understanding everyday life information seeking behavior in the context of coping with daily hassles:a grounded theory study of female students[J]. Library and information science research, 2019, 41(45):100980.
