[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to reveal the utilization status of the three representative datasets in Peking University Open Research Data Platform and provide references for the related research of scientific data open sharing.[Method/process] This paper selected CNKI papers using CFPS, CHARLS and CLHLS as the research objects, and adopted network analysis method and relevant tools to analyze their collaborative research from the dimensions of authors, institutions and themes.[Result/conclusion] After 2011, the annual collaboration degree of the research subjects has tended to be stable, and the collaboration rate gradually decreased with the expansion of the research subjects. The three centrality indicators can complement each other to find important institutions. The first-level institutions show that Peking University is the core, some institutions maintain collaboration, and many institutions actively participate in collaboration. The top-ranked second-level institutions in terms of the number of collaborative institutions and the total number of collaboration times are relatively stable, and maintain a solid collaborative relationship mutually, which can be roughly classified into three categories. The core author groups show that some author groups collaborate frequently and stably, and there are intermediary authors connecting to several collaborative groups. Moreover, collaborative research papers cover a variety of topics, focusing on physical and mental health of elderly people, family consumption and assets, as well as social security issues for the aging population. It can be improved in terms of building an authoritative integration platform of scientific data open sharing, integrating academic databases, and organizing academic competitions to promote the development of scientific data open sharing in the future.
Zhang Hui
,
Cheng Yuqi
,
Wang Chuanqing
. An Empirical Study on Collaborative Relation of Scientific Data Open Sharing: Based on Peking University Open Research Data Platform[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021
, 65(23)
: 22
-30
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.23.003
[1] UNESCO.UNESCO mobilizes 122 countries to promote open scienceand reinforced cooperation in the face of COVID-19[EB/OL].[2021-11-19]. https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-mobilizes-122-countries-promote-open-science-and-reinforced-cooperation-face-covid-19.
[2] 黄如花,赵洋,黄雨婷.国际开放科学研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2021,65(1):140-149.
[3] 人民网.中共中央关于制定十三五年规划的建议(全文)[EB/OL].[2021-11-19]. http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2015/1103/c1001-27772701.html.
[4] 国务院办公厅.国务院办公厅关于印发科学数据管理办法的通知[EB/OL].[2021-11-19]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-04/02/content_5279272.htm.
[5] 盛小平,郭道胜.科学数据开放共享中的数据安全治理研究[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(22):25-36.
[6] 盛小平,田婧,向桂林.科学数据开放共享中的数据质量治理研究[J].图书情报工作,2020, 64(22):11-24.
[7] 盛小平,袁园.国内外科学数据开放共享影响因素研究综述[J].情报理论与实践,2021,44(8):173-179.
[8] 温芳芳.国外科学数据开放共享政策研究[J].图书馆学研究,2017(9):91-100.
[9] 盛小平,武彤.国内外科学数据开放共享研究综述[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(17):6-14.
[10] 李成赞,张丽丽,侯艳飞,等.科学大数据开放共享:模式与机制[J].情报理论与实践,2017, 40(11):45-51.
[11] KITCHIN R, COLLINS S, FROST D. Funding models for open access digital data repositories[J]. Online information review, 2015, 39(5):664-681.
[12] WESSELS B, FINN R L, LINDE P, et al. Issues in the development of open access to research data[J]. Prometheus, 2014, 32(1):49-66.
[13] 盛小平,吴红.科学数据开放共享活动中不同利益相关者动力分析[J].图书情报工作,2019, 63(17):40-50.
[14] 张先恩.国家科学数据共享工程[J].科学中国人,2004(9):11-13.
[15] 国家科技基础条件平台中心.国家科学数据中心[EB/OL].[2021-11-19]. https://www.escience.org.cn/data-center/.
[16] 中国人民大学中国调查与数据中心.中国综合社会调查[EB/OL].[2021-11-19]. http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn/index.htm.
[17] 中国人民大学中国调查与数据中心.中国老年社会追踪调查项目概况[EB/OL].[2021-11-19].http://class.ruc.edu.cn/xmjs/xmgk.htm.
[18] 北京大学开放研究数据平台.北京大学开放研究数据平台简介[EB/OL].[2021-11-19]. https://opendata.pku.edu.cn/about.xhtml;jsessionid=45d5426f10e05399-8f4f63bcf98b.
[19] 李佳潞.科研人员数据重用行为影响因素及促进策略研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2019.
[20] 罗鹏程,朱玲,崔海媛,等.基于Dataverse的北京大学开放研究数据平台建设[J].图书情报工作, 2016,60(3):52-58.
[21] 朱玲,聂华,崔海媛,等.北京大学开放研究数据平台建设:探索与实践[J].图书情报工作, 2016,60(4):44-51.
[22] 赵蓉英,余波.Altmetrics Top100论文的合作模式及其影响力因素分析[J].情报科学,2020, 38(4):3-8.
[23] 魏瑞斌.科学计量学领域科研机构合作网络演化分析[J].情报杂志,2012,31(12):40-45.
[24] 张雪,张志强,陈秀娟.基于期刊论文的作者合作特征及其对科研产出的影响——以国际医学信息学领域高产作者为例[J].情报学报,2019,38(1):29-37.
[25] 黄丽霞,纪苏桐.基于SNA国内阅读推广领域作者合作关系研究[J].图书情报工作,64(7):119-126.
