[Purpose/significance] From the perspective of open access journal papers, the paper reveals the characteristics of open sharing cooperation behaviors, so as to promote cross-institutional and interdisciplinary cooperation of researchers and the practical development of the open sharing movement.[Method/process] Based on the citing papers of the top 100 cited papers in Plos One, this paper used citation analysis method and social network analysis method to reveal the characteristics of cooperation contents and the relationship of citing paper networks in Plos One.[Result/conclusion] Both the number of open sharing cooperation resultsand the cooperation rate in Plos One are increasing year by year, and features of multi-disciplinary and cross-institutional cooperation are significant. The cooperation contents focus on the biological environment and other natural science fields, while social science and humanities and art research are relatively few, and interdisciplinary cooperation research exist. The author cooperative relationship networks are characterized by multi-center and weak connection. The institutional cooperative relationship networks have formed a cooperative mode that scientific research institutes and universities as the core and government institutions and enterprises as the cooperative participants. The discipline cooperation networks have the characteristics of environmental adaptability and disciplinary inclusiveness, and the degree of cooperation and the correlation among the core disciplines are strong.
[1] UIDERWIJK A. Analysing open data in virtual research environments:new collaboration opportunities to improve policy making[J]. International journal of electronic government research,2017,13(4):76-92.
[2] 陈新兰,顾立平,刘金亚.开放科学背景下出版集团的开放出版政策转型与实践[J].中国科技期刊研究,2020,31(11):1289-1298.
[3] 杜杏叶,李涵霄,彭琳,等.科技期刊数字学术服务概念、内容与现状[J].中国科技期刊研究,2021,32(8):998-1006.
[4] 朱玲,李国俊,吴越.国外科学数据开放共享政策中的主体分工合作框架及启示[J].图书情报知识,2020,37(1):94-104.
[5] MALANDRINO D, MANNO I, PALMIERI G, et al. An architecture for social sharing and collaboration around open data visualisations[C]//GERGLE D, MORRIS M R. 19th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing companion. New York:SIGCHI,2016:357-360.
[6] 黄如花,陈闯.美国政府数据开放共享的合作模式[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(19):6-14.
[7] MCBRIDE K, TOOTS M, KALVET T, et al. Open government data driven co-creation:moving towards citizen-government collaboration[C]//PARYCEK P, GLASSEY O, JANSSEN M, et al. 18th international conference on electronic government. Krems:Springer,2018:184-195.
[8] 武琳,伍诗瑜.欧洲开放政府数据合作模式与实现——跨地区共建共享典范[J].情报资料工作,2017,38(4):75-80.
[9] 潘星,周晟瀚,李大庆,等.基于企业开放数据的校企合作科研训练模式实践——以北京航空航天大学为例[J].中国高校科技,2020,26(10):54-58.
[10] 夏少昂,许静.维客:开放、平等、合作、共享的理想[J].南京社会科学,2008,19(2):128-131.
[11] CARON B, TOOLE D, WICKS P, et al. DigitalOcean:building a platform for scientific collaboration and social and media sharing on the Drupal content management system[J]. Earth science informatics,2011,4(4):191-196.
[12] NELSON E K, PIEHLER B, ECKELS J, et al. LabKey Server:an open source platform for scientific data integration, analysis and collaboration[J]. BMC bioinformatics,2011, 12(1):1-23.
[13] 完颜邓邓,盛小平.国内开放存取研究论文中的作者合作关系——基于社会网络的分析[J].图书馆理论与实践,2014,36(7):42-45.
[14] 林章碧.国外大型综合开放存取期刊的嬗变对我国创办同类期刊的启示[J].编辑学报,2021,33(1):114-118.
[15] ZIMMER J. A positive review for Plos One[J]. Science,2010,330(6000):34.
[16] 张晓林,李麟,刘细文,等.开放获取学术信息资源:逼近"主流化"转折点[J].图书情报工作, 2012,56(9):42-47.
[17] 宋丽萍,王建芳,刘芮.基于主成分分析的科学评价维度研究——以Plos One为例[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(17):119-124.
[18] DING J, LIU C, ZHENG Q, et al. A new method of co-author credit allocation based on contributor roles taxonomy:proof of concept and evaluation using papers published in Plos One[J]. Scientometrics,2021,126(9):7561-7581.
[19] SYAMILI C, REKHA R V. Do altmetric correlate with citation:a study based on Plos One journal[J]. Collnetjournal of scientometrics and information management, 2017, 11(1):103-117.
[20] 徐庶睿,卢超,章成志.术语引用视角下的学科交叉测度——以PLOS ONE上六个学科为例[J].情报学报,2017,36(8):809-820.
[21] PlosOne[EB/OL].[2021-09-29].https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr-jp/journal-profile?journal=PLOS%20ONE&year=2020&fromPage=%2Fjcr%2Fhome.
[22] ABRAMO G, D'ANGELO C A, COSTA F D. Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of co-authors of scientific publications[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(11):2206-2222.
[23] NEWMAN M E. The structure of scientific collaboration networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2001,98(2):404-409.
[24] 盛亚,范栋梁.结构洞分类理论及其在创新网络中的应用[J].科学学研究,2009,27(9):1407-1411.
[25] 刘军.整体网络分析:UCINET软件使用指南(第二版)[M].上海:格致出版社,2014:243.
[26] 王亚飞,樊杰.中国主体功能区核心-边缘结构解析[J].地理学报,2019,74(4):710-722.
[27] 黄如花,赵洋,黄雨婷.国际开放科学研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2021,65(1):140-149.
[28] 邱均平,刘国徽.基于社会网络和关键词分析的作者合作研究——以国内知识管理领域为例[J].情报科学,2014,32(6):3-7,13.
[29] MILGRAM S. The small world problem[J]. Psychology today,1967,2(1):60-67.
[30] 邱均平,王菲菲.基于SNA的国内竞争情报领域作者合作关系研究[J].图书馆论坛,2010,30(6):34-40,134.
[31] 黄丽霞,纪苏桐.基于SNA国内阅读推广领域作者合作关系研究[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(7):119-126.
[32] 羊晚成,胡孙婕,张若愚.我国编辑出版学合作网络与合作研究热点分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(10):959-964.
[33] 邱均平,詹卓.基于SNA的《中国图书馆学报》作者合作关系可视化研究[J].图书馆, 2013(6):44-47.
[34] 董彦邦,刘莉.我国高校高水平论文的机构合作网络演化分析[J].情报杂志,2019,38(11):138-144,157.
[35] 曹志鹏,潘启亮.我国高校间科研创新合作现状——基于2014年合著论文的社会网络分析[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(1):93-98.
[36] 郝若扬,逯万辉.我国人文社会科学学术合作特征演变研究[J].情报杂志,2018,37(6):124-132.
[37] BHARDWAJ RK. Open research data repositories:a content analysis to comprehend data equitable access[J].Journal of scientometric research,2019,8(3):135-142.
[38] 陈传夫,李秋实.数据开放获取使科学惠及更广——中国开放科学与科学数据开放获取的进展与前瞻[J].信息资源管理学报,2020,10(1):4-13.
[39] JISC. UK institutions and Wiley agree ground-breaking deal[EB/OL].[2021-09-29]. https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2020/Jisc-UK-Institutions-and-Wiley-Agree-Ground-Breaking-Deal/default.aspx.
