[Purpose/significance] Live training is a convenient way of knowledge dissemination, especially since COVID9, it has become an indispensable means of knowledge dissemination, and has also become an important way for libraries to develop information literacy education training. Analyzing the influencing factors of trainee concentration during information literacy education live training has references to improve the live training services. [Method/process] The research was based on the 171 live training data carried out by the "Scientific Information Literacy Lecture Hall of the Chinese Academy of Sciences". From the perspective of the organization of training activities, by constructing a regression model, it empirically analyzed the impact of core elements of the training content, training organization, training time, and viewing equipment during the implementation process of the live training organization to the trainee concentration, and further explored the impact of various factors on the concentration of mobile and non-mobile trainees. [Result/conclusion] The empirical results show that the viewing equipment, course or not, and register or not significantly affects the concentration of the trainees. Theme types, subject attributes, charge or not, and time arrangements have a significant impact on the concentration of mobile terminal trainees. It is suggested to optimize the training content system, standardize training organization management, strengthen mobile service research, adopt incentive means and strengthen practical training and interactive links.
Liao Qingyun
,
Li Ling
,
Lu Lu
,
Fei Pengfei
,
Zou Muhong
. An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Trainee Concentration on Information Literacy Education Live Training[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022
, 66(3)
: 65
-71
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.03.008
[1] 全国科学技术名词审定委员会. 图书馆·情报与文献学名词[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2019.
[2] 李玲, 廖青云, 赵亚娟. 面向研究所科研一线的信息素养教育实践探索[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(24):32-8.
[3] 尹睿, 徐欢云. 国外在线学习投入的研究进展与前瞻[J]. 开放教育研究, 2016, 22(3):89-97.
[4] 兰国帅, 郭倩, 钟秋菊. MOOC学习投入度与学习坚持性关系研究[J]. 开放教育研究, 2019, 25(2):65-77.
[5] KUH G D, CHEN D, LAIRD T F N. Why teacher-scholars matter:some insights from FSSE and NSSE[J]. Liberal education, 2007(4):40-45.
[6] 刘玉梅. 在线教学中的学习投入:行为构成与实证分析[J]. 中国成人教育, 2021, (9):25-8.
[7] 高洁. 外部动机与在线学习投入的关系:自我决定理论的视角[J]. 电化教育研究, 2016, 37(10):64-9.
[8] 万昆, 饶爱京, 徐如梦. 哪些因素影响了学习者的在线学习投入?——兼论智能时代在线学习的发展[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2021(6):97-104.
[9] 雷玉菊, 周宗奎, 田媛. 网络学习环境下学习者的动机信念对学习投入的影响[J]. 中国电化教育, 2017(2):82-88.
[10] KIM C M, PARK S W, COZART, et al. From motivation to engagement:the role of effort regulation of virtual high school students in mathematics courses[J]. Journal of educational technology & society, 2015, 18(4):261-272.
[11] 翟兴, 陈超, 王鸿蕴. 信息素养对大学生网络学习投入的影响研究——以新冠疫情期间的大规模、长周期网络教学为例[J]. 现代教育技术, 2020, 30(10):98-104.
[12] HENRIE C R, BODILY R, MANWARING K C, et al. Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning[J]. International review of research in open & distributed learning, 2015, 16(3):131-155.
[13] 孙若愚, 李大兵, 李专, 等. 学习环境对大学生在线学习投入度的影响研究[J]. 高等农业教育, 2021(2):45-50.
[14] DIXSON M D. Creating effective student engagement in online courses:what do students find engaging?[J]. Journal of scholarship of teaching & learning, 2010, 10(2):1-13.
[15] CAROLL J B. A model of school learning[J]. Teachers college record, 1963, 64(8):723-733.
[16] 初景利, 刘敬仪, 张冬荣, 等. 从信息素养教育到泛信息素养教育——中国科学院大学15年的实践探索[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(6):3-9.
