[Purpose/significance] Summarizing and reflecting on the current status and deficiencies of the ecological security risk governance actions of network information contents is to improve the effectiveness of future governance actions. [Method/process] The article investigated and sorted out the characteristics of the four major governance actions, "periodical theme-based special actions", "fixed-point targeted special actions", "big content service platform targeted actions" and "emergency-related special actions" for the ecological security risk governance of network information contents, benchmarked the Regulations on the Ecological Governance of Network Information Contents, and analyzed the deficiencies of existing governance actions in five aspects of governance objectives, governance participants, governance objects, processes and methods of governance and governance tools. [Result/conclusion] The article finally puts forward the logic of network information content ecological security risk governance actions based on "PDCA-5 dimensional elements" framework. In addition, the article also proposes the upgrading and combination strategies of four types of actions: rights-based sports governance actions, normalized participatory governance actions, constructive active governance actions and perception-based smart governance actions.
Bai Wenlin
,
Zhou Yi
. Governance Action and Its Transformation of Ecological Security Risks of Network Information Contents[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022
, 66(5)
: 24
-32
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.05.003
[1] 《网络信息内容生态治理规定》施行以来网站平台自查自纠见成效[EB/OL].[2021-03-23].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1670884092852266610&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[2] 国家网信办2020年治理行动盘点[EB/OL].[2021-03-23].http://yuqing.people.com.cn/n1/2021/0114/c209043-31999568.html.
[3] 周毅.论网络信息内容生态治理机制的构建[J].情报杂志, 2020,39(12):100-105.
[4] LIAROPOULOS A N. Cyberspace governance and state sovereignty[M]. Cham: Springer, 2017.
[5] CHU W, LEE K T, LUO W, et al. Predicting the security threats of internet rumors and spread of false information based on sociological principle[J]. Computer standards & interfaces, 2020, 73(1):103454.
[6] 刘章仪.短视频兴起背景下的网络意识形态风险防范[J]. 领导科学, 2020(14):38-41.
[7] 谢新洲,朱垚颖.网络内容治理发展态势与应对策略研究[J].新闻与写作, 2020(4):78-84.
[8] 周毅.总体国家安全观视域的网络信息内容治理:进展,内涵与研究逻辑[J].情报理论与实践, 2020,43(8):44-50.
[9] 宋嘉庚,赵璐敏,张钰儿.网络治理视角下网络监管机制探析[J].出版发行研究, 2020(5):52-58.
[10] PROVAN K G, KENIS P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2008, 18(2): 229-252.
[11] HVTTEN M. The soft spot of hard code: blockchain technology, network governance and pitfalls of technological utopianism[J]. Global networks, 2019, 19(3): 329-348.
[12] LARSSON O L. The governmentality of network governance: collaboration as a new facet of the liberal art of governing[J]. Constellations, 2019, 27(1): 111-126.
[13] 深入开展2020"清朗"专项行动各地网信部门在行动[EB/OL].[2021-04-26].http://www.cac.gov.cn/2020-07/09/c_1595854510933390.htm.
[14] 8部门:研究制定主播账号分级分类管理规范规范主播带货行为[EB/OL].[2021-04-26].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1674064891608883013&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[15] 国家网信办开展"自媒体"基础管理专项治理[EB/OL].[2021-04-22].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=167356775240 7975617&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[16] 陈璐颖.互联网内容治理中的平台责任研究[J].出版发行研究,2020(6):12-18.
[17] 浙江打响"清朗侠在行动"战役织密抗击疫情生态治理网[EB/OL].[2021-02-26].http://www.cac.gov.cn/2020-03/30/c_1587116320391779.htm.
[18] 我国网络生态治理取得成效[EB/OL].[2021-03-26].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1671068819583158676&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[19] 上海建立重大网络事件综合协调处置机制[EB/OL].[2021-03-26].http://www.whb.cn/zhuzhan/cs/20190531/267169.html.
[20] 桂畅旎.我国网络内容治理面临的新形势与新挑战[J].中国信息安全,2020(2):59-62.
[21] 深度治理网络黑灰产应当构建平台协同联动机制[EB/OL].[2021-04-26].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1671715491717410316&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[22] 王丽娜.互联网运动式治理的法治化转型研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2020.
[23] 胡凌.网站治理:制度与模式[J].北大法律评论, 2009(2):182-202.
[24] 林爱珺,章梦天.网络内容生态治理的多元主体责任规制[J].新闻爱好者,2021(4):14-16.
[25] 周毅.试论网络信息内容治理主体构成及其行动转型[J].电子政务,2020(12):41-51.
[26] 焦俊峰,李晓东.网络安全的治理之道: "技治、法治、众治、德治"四治融合[EB/OL].[2021-05-11].https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_5418485.
[27] 潘泽泉,任杰.从运动式治理到常态治理:基层社会治理转型的中国实践[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2020,34(3):110-116.
[28] GIL O, CORTÉS-CEDIEL M E, CANTADOR I. Citizen participation and the rise of digital media platforms in smart governance and smart cities[J]. International journal of e-planning research (IJEPR), 2019, 8(1): 19-34.
[29] CHANG L Y C, GRABOSKY P. The governance of cyberspace[M]//DRAHOS P. Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. Canberra: ANU Press, 2017: 533-551.
[30] 周毅. 总体国家安全观视域的网络信息内容治理:进展、内涵与研究逻辑[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(8): 44-50.
[31] 石翠.微传播舆情的影响及治理路径研究[J].新闻研究导刊, 2017, 8(15):26-27,39.作者贡献说明: 白文琳:参与拟定研究问题及提出论文研究思路,收集分析数据,撰写与修改论文; 周毅:拟定研究问题,提出论文研究思路,撰写、修改论文并定稿。
