SPECIAL TOPIC: Governance of Ecological Security Risks of Network Information Content

Research on the Theoretical Framework and Realization Strategy of the Holistic Intelligent Governance for the Ecological Security Risk of Network Information Content

  • Zhou Yi ,
  • Zhang Xue
Expand
  • School of Sociology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123;Center for Data Governance and Industrial Development, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123

Received date: 2021-06-06

  Revised date: 2021-11-01

  Online published: 2022-03-21

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The ecological security risk of network information content is a new type of information ecological security problem, which affects and threatens the overall national security from multiple dimensions. [Method/process] Based on the theory of holistic governance, intelligent governance and technological intermediation, this paper put forward the concepts, logical relations and basic contents of the theoretical framework construction of holistic intelligent governance of network information content ecological security risk, and specifically explained the significance of the theoretical framework construction of holistic intelligent governance. [Result/conclusion] The paper signifies the theoretical framework construction of holistic intelligent governance of network information content ecological security risk is an organic fusion of integrity and intelligent governance with information technology as the intermediary. In order to specifically promote its organization and implementation, the implementation path can be selected from the construction of an institutionalized mechanism guarantee system and the implementation of an intelligent technical support system.

Cite this article

Zhou Yi , Zhang Xue . Research on the Theoretical Framework and Realization Strategy of the Holistic Intelligent Governance for the Ecological Security Risk of Network Information Content[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022 , 66(5) : 44 -52 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.05.005

References

[1] CARAVELLI J, JONES N. Cyber security: threats and responses for government and business[M]. California: ABC-CLIO,2019.
[2] 何明升.网络内容治理的概念构建和形态细分[J].浙江社会科学,2020(9):64-72.
[3] 赵蓉英,余波.网络信息安全研究进展与问题探析[J].现代情报,2018,38(11):116-122.
[4] 李源粒.网络数据安全与公民个人信息保护的刑法完善[J].中国政法大学学报,2015(4):64-78, 159.
[5] 支振锋.网络安全风险与互联网内容治理的法治化[J].改革,2018(1):44-46.
[6] 何明升.中国网络治理的定位与现实路径[J].中国社会科学,2016(7):112-119.
[7] 周毅.数字遗产保存的行动路线研究[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(4):15-20.
[8] 支振锋.提升网络生态治理效能的制度探索[J].信息安全与通信保密,2020(2):5-11.
[9] 周毅,吉顺权.网络空间多元主体协同治理模式构建研究[J].电子政务,2016(7):2-11.
[10] 谢新洲,李佳伦.中国互联网内容管理宏观政策与基本制度发展简史[J].信息资源管理学报,2019(3):41-53.
[11] 王平.多元视角下用户生成内容的信息质量评估研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2020.
[12] 朱庆华.新一代互联网环境下用户生成内容的研究与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2014.
[13] 苏新宁.应急响应情报体系:理论、技术与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2019.
[14] 王世伟.论信息安全、网络安全与网络空间安全[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(3):72-81.
[15] KIMANI K, ODUOL V, LANGAT K. Cyber security challenges for IoT-based smart grid networks[J]. International journal of critical infrastructure protection, 2019, 25(1):36-49.
[16] 马费成,李小宇.中国互联网内容监管主体结构与演化研究[J].情报学报,2014,33(5):452-464.
[17] 黄如花,温芳芳.在开放政府数据条件下如何规范政府数据:从国际开放定义和开放政府数据原则谈起[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(9):37-44.
[18] 何明升.网络内容治理:基于负面清单的信息质量监管[J].新视野,2018(4):108-114.
[19] PROVAN K G, KENIS P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2008, 18(2): 229-252.
[20] HVTTEN M. The soft spot of hard code: blockchain technology, network governance and pitfalls of technological utopianism[J]. Global networks, 2019, 19(3): 329-348.
[21] 马费成,李小宇.中国互联网内容监管主体结构与演化研究[J].情报学报,2014,33(5):452-464.
[22] DAVIS R E. Auditing information and cyber security governance[M]. Los Angeles: CRC Press,2021.
[23] PARDINI D J, HEINISCH A, PARREIRAS F S. Cyber security governance and management for smart grids in Brazilian energy Utilities[J]. Journal of information systems and technology management,2017,14(3):385-400.
[24] 许鑫.西方国家网络治理经验及对我国的启示[J].电子政务,2018(12):45-53.
[25] QIAN X M, ZHANG J Y. Global cyber security governance in the new era: status, dilemma, and development[C]//2020 International conference on materials, control, automation and electrical engineering. Piscataway: IEEE Press,2020:41-45.
[26] 周毅.试论网络信息内容治理主体构成及其行动转型[J].电子政务,2020(12):41-51.
[27] LARSSON O L. The governmentality of network governance: collaboration as a new facet of the liberal art of governing[J]. Constellations, 2019, 27(1): 111-126.
[28] 郁建兴,黄飚.整体智治:公共治理创新与信息技术革命互动融合[N].光明日报,2020-06-12(11).
[29] 朱浩齐.构建全链路内容风控体系解决内容安全难题[J].中国信息安全,2020(2):73-74.
[30] PERRI 6, DIANA L, KIMBERLY S, et al.Towards holistic governance: the new reform agenda[M]. New York: Palgrave, 2002.
[31] 谭成华.智慧治理的内涵、逻辑和基础分析[J].领导科学,2019(12):51-54.
[32] 陈成文.论市域社会治理的风险防控能力[J].社会科学家,2020(8): 15-20.
[33] 朱勤.技术中介理论:一种现象学的技术伦理学思路[J].科学技术哲学研究,2010(1):101-106.
[34] 王丛.新闻自动生成——人工智能正在逐步走进金融领域[EB/OL].[2021-10-21].http://blog.memect.cn/?p=75.
[35] 周毅.论网络信息内容生态治理机制的构建[J].情报杂志,2020,36(12):96-101.
[36] 陈堂发.网络公共性表达法治问题研究[M].广州:中山大学出版社.2017.
[37] WANG T, ULMER J R, KANNAN K.The textual contents of media reports of information security breaches and profitable short-term investment opportunities[J]. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce, 2013, 23 (3):200-223.
[38] 余敏江.整体智治:块数据驱动的新型社会治理模式[J].行政论坛,2020(4):76-82.
[39] 朱浩齐.构建全链路内容风控体系解决内容安全难题[J].中国信息安全,2020(2):73-74.
Outlines

/