[Purpose/significance] Aiming at problems of intelligent Q&A based on Q&A pairs such as low accuracy and resolution rate and poor user satisfaction, this paper constructs a knowledge graph (KG) ontology model that supports the realization of dynamic and accurate intelligent Q&A based on the knowledge graph. [Method/process] First, the paper analyzed the current problems and causes of intelligent question answering, and proposed a plan to build a knowledge graph to support intelligent question answering. Second, On the basis of existing ontology model construction methods, the paper proposed a multi-round loop method integrating multi-level data, which used the business data provided by the enterprises, user data and business system dynamic data as the data sources. And the core steps were to build a basic framework, improve the knowledge structure, and align three cycles of the knowledge structure. Finally, this paper took the domain of return and exchange as a case to describe the concrete steps of ontology model construction, from zero, added incrementally, and constructed ontology model of knowledge graph. [Result/conclusion] This paper applies the knowledge graph with the return ontology model as the schema layer in an intelligent Q&A system for testing. The evaluation results show that the accuracy rate increased by 50% and the precision rate increased by 300% after the return and exchange knowledge graph is online. So, the proposed ontology model construction method sorts out the complete and fine-grained domain knowledge structure from scattered domain knowledge, can provide accurate answers to users in intelligent Q&A, and can effectively solve the intelligent Q&A dilemma based on Q&A pairs.
Zhou Yi
,
Liu Zheng
,
Su Xiaoqing
,
Jin Ticheng
. Ontology Model Construction of Question-Answering Knowledge Graph Integrating Multi-Level Data[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022
, 66(5)
: 125
-132
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.05.013
[1] SINGHAL A. Official Google blog:introducing the knowledge graph:things, not strings[EB/OL].[2021-07-02]. https://www.blog.google/products/search/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not/.
[2] IRENE P. Knowledge graphs vs property graphs a brief overview and comparison[EB/OL].[2021-05-21]. https://www.topquadrant.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Knowledge-Graphs-vs.-Property-Graphs-A-Brief-Overview-and-Comparison.pdf.
[3] GRUBER T R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications[J]. Knowledge acquisition, 1993, 5(2):199-220.
[4] GRVNINGER M, FOX M S. Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies[EB/OL].[2021-12-21]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.44.8723&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[5] USCHOLD M, KING M. Towards a methodology for building ontologies[M]. Edinburgh:University of Edinburgh, 1995.
[6] FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ M, GÓMEZ-PÉREZ A, JURISTO N. Methontology:from ontological art towards ontological engineering[J]. Engineering workshop on ontological engineering,1997(Mar.):33-40.
[7] SURE Y, STAAB S, STUDER R. On-to-knowledge methodology (OTKM)[M]//Handbook on ontologies. Berlin:Springer, 2004:117-132.
[8] SUÁREZ-FIGUEROA M C, GÓMEZ-PÉREZ A, FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ M. The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering[M]//Ontology engineering in a networked world. Berlin:Springer, 2012:9-34.
[9] DE NICOLA A, MISSIKOFF M, NAVIGLI R, et al. A software engineering approach to ontology building[J]. Information systems, 2009, 34(2):258-275.
[10] NOY N F, MCGUINNESS D L. Ontology development 101:a guide to creating your first ontology[EB/OL].[2021-12-21]. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf.
[11] GANGEMI A, PRESUTTI V. Ontology design patterns[M]//Handbook on ontologies. Berlin:Springer, 2009:221-243.
[12] PRESUTTI V, DAGA E, GANGEMI A, et al. eXtreme design with content ontology design patterns[C]//Procecdings of workshop on ontology patterns. Washington D.C.:CEUR-WS.Org., 2009:83-97.
[13] 朱妍昕,徐维,王霞,等.基于FAIR原则的循证医学文献本体构建——以哮喘药物治疗文献本体为例[J/OL].情报理论与实践:1-12[2021-09-30].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20210819.1201.002.html.
[14] 贾君枝.《汉语主题词表》转换为本体的思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2007(4):41-44.
[15] 段瑞龙,宋文.国内外叙词表转换本体方法研究综述[J].情报杂志,2012,31(7):66-71.
[16] ZHEN Z,TANG A M,SHEN J Y,et al.Thesaurus-based approach for building domain ontology with a case study of military aircraft prototype ontology construction[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition),2006(3):353-356.
[17] WIŚNIEWSKI D, POTONIEC J, ŁAWRYNOWICZ A, et al. Analysis of ontology competency questions and their formalizations in SPARQL-OWL[J]. Journal of Web semantics, 2020(29):1-13.
[18] 杨波,廖怡茗.面向企业动态风险的知识图谱构建与应用研究[J].现代情报,2021,41(3):110-120.
[19] 张肃,许慧.基于知识图谱的企业知识服务模型构建研究[J].情报科学,2020,38(8):68-73.
[20] DE NICOLA A, MISSIKOFF M. A lightweight methodology for rapid ontology engineering[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2016, 59(3):79-86.
[21] SUÁREZ-FIGUEROA M C, GÓMEZ-PÉREZ A. Ontology requirements specification[M]//Ontology engineering in a networked world. Berlin:Springer, 2012:93-106.
[22] D'ANTONIO F, MISSIKOFF M, TAGLINO F. Formalizing the OPAL eBusiness ontology design patterns with OWL[M]//Enterprise interoperability II. London:Springer, 2007:345-356.
