[Purpose/Significance] This study explores the differences in search interaction behaviors, collaborative experience and learning effect among groups with different levels of prior knowledge differences, so as to enrich the cognition of collaborative information search behaviors and provide suggestions for collaborative search learning in real situations. [Method/Process] The user experiment method was adopted to design two search tasks of comprehension and evaluation. Interactive behaviors were recorded by screen recording, the collaborative experience data was collected by combining questionnaires, and state and changes of knowledge before and after collaborative search were recorded by mind mapping. Statistical test methods such as variance analysis were used to analyze the effect of the data. [Result/Conclusion] The research finds: In terms of search interaction behaviors, the groups with higher prior knowledge level used more search terms than the groups with lower prior knowledge level; In terms of collaborative search experience, groups with similar prior knowledge level have higher evaluation on their own task completion; In terms of knowledge status changes, the knowledge breadth of the homogenous low level groups increase significantly more than that of the other two groups, but in terms of quality, there is little difference between the groups after search. In the end, this study puts forward some suggestions on how to improve users’ collaborative search experience and learning effect about the search system.
[1] MARCHIONINI G. Search, sense making and learning:closing gaps[J]. Information and learning sciences,2019,120(1/2):74-86.
[2] RIEH S Y, COLLINS K, HANSEN P, et al. Towards searching as a learning process:a review of current perspectives and future directions[J]. Journal of information science,2016,42(1):19-34.
[3] BILAL D. Children's use of the Yahooligans!Web search engine:I. cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2010,51(7):646-665.
[4] YIN C, SUNG H Y, HWANG G J, et al. Learning by searching:a learning environment that provides searching and analysis facilities for supporting trend analysis activities[J]. Journal of educational technology&society,2013,16(3):286-300.
[5] XU L, ZHOU X, GADIRAJU U. How does team composition affect knowledge gain of users in collaborative web search?[C]//Proceedings of the 31st ACM conference on hypertext and social media. New York:ACM,2020:91-100.
[6] MORRIS M R, TEEVAN J. Collaborative web search:who, what, where, when, and why[M/OL].[2021-11-15]. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00230ED1V01Y200912ICR014.
[7] 张璐,张鹏翼,刘畅.协同搜索过程中用户交流内容与模式研究[J].图书情报知识,2020(3):51-62.
[8] 邱瑾,吴丹.协同信息检索行为中的情感研究[J].图书与情报,2013(2):105-110.
[9] 张璐,刘畅,张鹏翼.协同搜索与独立搜索的行为与体验的比较研究[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(21):62-70.
[10] GHOSH S, RATH M, SHAH C. Searching as learning:exploring search behavior and learning outcomes in learning-related tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction&retrieval. New York:ACM,2018:22-31.
[11] 刘畅,宋筱璇,杨子傲.用户信息搜索中的学习行为及过程探究[J].大学图书馆学报,2019,37(4):36-45.
[12] 刘涵蕊,刘畅.认知风格与话题熟悉度对学习型任务下搜索交互行为的影响研究[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(4):56-62.
[13] 韩爽,沈秀丽,闫智.将搜索作为一个学习过程:一种学习型搜索的观点和方向[J].图书馆理论与实践,2019(1):70-73,83.
[14] POLTROCK S, GRUDIN J, DUMAIS S, et al. Information seeking and sharing in design teams[C]//Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work. New York:ACM,2003:239-247.
[15] YUE Z, HAN S, HE D. An investigation of search processes in collaborative exploratory Web search[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012,49(1):1-4.
[16] YUE Z, HAN S, HE D. An investigation of the query behavior in task-based collaborative exploratory Web search[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,50(1):1-10.
[17] LEEDER C, SHAH C. Library research as collaborative information seeking[J]. Library and Information Science Research,2016,38(3):202-211.
[18] 张敏,车雨霏,张艳.差异化任务情境下用户在线旅游协同信息检索的行为特征分析[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(10):84-90.
[19] LEEDER C, SHAN C. Collaborative information seeking in student group projects[J].Aslib journal of information management,2016,68(5):526-544.
[20] LIU J, BELKIN N J, ZHANG X, et al. Examining users'knowledge change in the task completion process[J]. Information processing and management,2013,49(5):1058-1074.
[21] BHATTACHARYA N, GWIZDKA J. Measuring learning during search:differences in interactions, eye-gaze, and semantic similarity to expert knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM,2019:63-71.
[22] 宋筱璇,刘畅.搜索前后用户知识水平的评估及其变化情况分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(2):108-116.
[23] LIU H, LIU C, BELKIN N J. Investigation of users'knowledge change process in learning-related search tasks[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2019,56(1):166-175.
[24] LIU C, SONG X, LIU H, et al. Modeling knowledge change behaviors in Learning-related Tasks[EB/OL].[2021-11-15]. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2699/paper18.pdf.
[25] GADIRAJU U, YU R, DIETZE S, et al. Analyzing knowledge gain of users in informational search sessions on the Web[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction&retrieval. New York:ACM,2018:2-11.
[26] 韩正彪,郭靖怡,潘培培,等.基于认知分类的大学生网络健康信息搜索的学习效果研究[J].图书情报知识,2020(4):19-31.
[27] COLLINS K, RIEH S Y, HAYNES C C, et al. Assessing learning outcomes in Web search:a comparison of tasks and query strategies[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM,2016:163-172.
[28] ANDERSON L W, LORIN W, KRATHWOHL, et al. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing[J]. European legacy,2001,114(458):1013-1014.
[29] BORLUND P, INGWERSEN P. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems[J]. The journal of documentation, 1997, 53(3):225-250.
[30] 李月琳,肖雪,胡蝶.信息检索实验中的任务设计——真实与模拟仿真工作任务的比较研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(16):5-12.
[31] 刘吉林,王坦.合作学习的基本理念(一)[J].人民教育,2004(1):26-27.
[32] 王坦.论合作学习的基本理念[J].教育研究,2002(2):68-72.
[33] LAW E L C, ROTO V, HASSENZAHL M, et al. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York:ACM,2009:719-728.
[34] HAN S, HE D, YUE Z, et al. Contextual support for collaborative information retrieval[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM,2016:33-42.作者贡献说明:姜雪:负责研究结果、讨论、结论与展望部分撰写,辅助研究方法撰写;李雨佳:负责概述、研究方法、研究结果部分撰写,辅助讨论部分撰写;张元哲:负责文献回顾、研究结果部分撰写,辅助讨论部分、研究方法部分撰写;刘畅:论文思路指导,论文修改。
