[Purpose/Significance] As one of the main means of dissemination of academic achievements, academic conferences can lead the academic direction, influence academic decision-making, determine academic rules and identify excellent academic achievements. From this perspective, academic conferences, as a subject, have a certain discourse power in the academic community. The research on the evaluation of the academic conferences discourse power has certain theoretical and practical significance for the academic development of our country. [Method/Process] Based on the perspective of organizational structure, this paper clarified the definition and connotation of academic conference discourse power through combing and summarizing the existing research. Secondly, combined with information metrology and evaluation theory, this paper analyzed the constituent elements of academic conference discourse power evaluation. [Result/Conclusion] Through the research, this paper summarizes the evaluation elements of the discourse power of academic conferences into the leading power of academic conferences, the communication power of academic conferences and the influence of academic conferences. Based on the evaluation elements, this paper obtains the evaluation index system of academic conference discourse power, and summarizes the evaluation research ideas, in order to provide new ideas for the construction of academic discourse power evaluation system in China.
Zhao Rongying
,
Lu Lan
,
Chang Ruru
,
Zhu Weijie
. Research on the Evaluation of Discourse Power in Academic Conferences[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022
, 66(11)
: 42
-49
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.11.005
[1] 戴光荣.从"走出去"到"走进去"[N].中国社会科学报,2020-01-10(4).
[2] 韩璞庚.公共理性视域中的学术期刊与中国学术话语建构[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2009(11):82-85.
[3] 张连海.共同体视阈下中国学术话语权发展路径的转换[J].湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,35(5):142-146.
[4] HARRIS Z S. Discourse analysis[J]. Language, 1952, 28(1):1-30.
[5] 庄琴芳.福柯后现代话语观与中国话语建构[J].外语学刊,2007(5):94-96.
[6] FUCAUIT M. The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language[M]. New York:Knopf Doubleday,1982.
[7] 毛跃.论社会主义核心价值观的国际话语权[J].浙江社会科学,2013(7):27-32,26,155-156.
[8] 胡伟光,周全华.论话语权与意识形态领导权[J].中共福建省委党校学报,2019(3):160-168.
[9] 张志洲.话语质量:提升国际话语权的关键[J].红旗文稿,2010(14):22-24.
[10] 谢群.学术期刊国际化与国际话语权的竞争[J].学理论,2014(10):172-173.
[11] 赵蓉英,王旭,余波,等.中国话语权的评价科学研究框架构建[J].图书与情报,2019(4):122-131.
[12] 周金娉,闫敏,沐光雨.会议录学术影响力评价指标体系构建研究[J].图书馆学研究,2018(22):97-101,96.
[13] 刘国卫.学术会议质量评价探讨[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1991(4):24-26.
[14] 王思懿,郑少丽,陈朋.基于三方视角的参会动机研究——以2020中国肿瘤防治联盟年会为例[J].商展经济,2021(18):8-10.
[15] 杨民,毕小敬.学术会议质量评估方法的可行性[J].中国现代医学杂志, 1994(4):74-75.
[16] LOIZIDES O S, KOUTSAKIS P. On evaluating the quality of a computer science/computer engineering conference[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2017, 11(2):541-552.
[17] 肖建华,霍国庆,董帅,等.基于平衡计分卡的学术会议效果评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(12):48-54.
[18] 李爽,吕艳伟.骨科学术会议的效果和满意度评价[J].北京医学,2013,35(7):570-571.
[19] 郑毅,刘文斌,宋泽宁.组织结构视角下我国学术会议绩效评价管理研究[J].科研管理,2020,41(3):194-204.
[20] 郑华,郭雅利.提升中国国际话语权研究的路径探索[J].国外理论动态,2018(9):119-127.
[21] 郑杭生.学术话语权与中国社会学发展[J].中国社会科学,2011(2):27-34,4,220.
[22] 张正堂.中国管理科学学术话语权构建与高校科研行为引导[J].南京社会科学,2016(11):10-16.
[23] 张静,郑晓南.中国英文科技期刊国际学术话语权的构建[J].科技与出版,2017(6):111-115.
[24] BITTNER E. The concept of organization[J]. Social research, 1965, 32(3):239-255.
[25] 张发林.全球金融治理议程设置与中国国际话语权[J].世界经济与政治,2020(6):106-131,159.
[26] 高海波.拉斯韦尔5W模式探源[J].国际新闻界,2008(10):37-40.
[27] NELAKUDITI S, GRAY C, CHOUDHURY R R. Snap judgement of publication quality:how to convince a dean that you are a good researcher[J]. Mobile computing and communications review, 2011, 15(2):20-23.
[28] 张毓强,庞敏.新时代中国国际传播:新基点、新逻辑与新路径[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2021,43(7):40-49.
[29] 谭一泓,贾鹤鹏,严雯羽,等.作为文化的科学传播——以四大主要国际科学会议为例[J].科学与社会,2021,11(1):152-168.
[30] 万虹育,赵纪东,刘文浩.社交媒体视角下的学术信息传播模式研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2020(3):85-90,123.
[31] 唐家蕙,李晓轩,郑毅,等.学术会议质量综合评价研究及实践[J].科技导报,2021,39(17):106-114.
[32] INGWERSEN P. The calculation of Web impact factors[J]. Journal of documentation, 1998, 54(2):236-243.
[33] KUNGAS P,KARUS S,VAKULENKO S, et al. Reverse-engineering conference rankings:what does it take to make a reputable conference?[J].Scientometrics,2013(96):651-665.
[34] 王倩.h指数及其衍生指数在评价学术会议中的应用研究[J].科技情报开发与经济, 2015(15):135-139.
[35] 王睿,胡文静,郭玮.常用Altmetrics工具比较[J].现代图书情报技术,2014(12):18-26.
[36] 刘恩涛,李国俊,邱小花,等.Altmetrics工具比较研究[J].图书馆杂志,2015,34(8):85-92.
[37] 邱均平,余厚强.论推动替代计量学发展的若干基本问题[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(1):4-15.作者贡献说明:赵蓉英:论文选题、框架设计、论文指导、论文修改;卢兰:论文撰写、论文修改;常茹茹:文献调研、论文修改;朱伟杰:文献调研、论文修改。
