SERVICE RESEARCH

Library Anxiety: Measurement, Antecedents and Outcomes: Empirical Research on Academic Library Users

  • Liang Xingkun ,
  • Chen Nuo
Expand
  • 1 Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
    2 Department of Computer Science, Waseda University, Tokyo 169-8555

Received date: 2022-06-01

  Revised date: 2022-09-13

  Online published: 2022-10-25

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Empirical research on library anxiety in China focuses only on measuring library anxiety, there is a lack of empirical research on the causes and consequences of library anxiety. To bridge this gap, this paper develops and validates a theoretical model with antecedents (study stress) and outcomes (library visits) of library anxiety from the perspective of users of academic libraries.[Method/Process] Data were collected from 226 users of academic libraries with questionnaires, and marker variable approach was adopted to deal with potential common method bias. With PLS-SEM, the measurement structure of new library anxiety scale was examined, and tested the relationship between library anxiety and its antecedent and consequence variables.[Result/Conclusion] A 5-dimension and 18-item library anxiety scale is developed. The measurement of library anxiety with this scale is found marginally significantly affects by common method variances (β=0.108,p=0.069). In this sense, our study also supports the usage of the marker variable approach in accounting for common method bias in empirical studies in LIS. After controlling for the effect of common method bias, it also reveals a significant negative relationship between study stress and library anxiety. Library anxiety is also negative associated with user's frequency of library visits but not directly linked to user's length of stay per library visit. It shows the antecedents and the outcomes of users' library anxiety of academic libraries, and reveals the internal mechanism of how library anxiety was developed. It provides new empirical evidence for understanding of library anxiety of Chinese library users, and also provides an alternative perspective for libraries to reduce library anxiety of users.

Cite this article

Liang Xingkun , Chen Nuo . Library Anxiety: Measurement, Antecedents and Outcomes: Empirical Research on Academic Library Users[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022 , 66(19) : 61 -71 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.19.006

References

[1] MELLON A. Library anxiety:a grounded theory and its development[J]. College & research library, 1986, 76:276-282.
[2] 王细荣.图书馆焦虑及其研究述评[J].大学图书馆学报,2006(3):6-12.
[3] 袁琳,吴汉华.国外图书馆焦虑研究综述[J].情报科学,2008(2):311-315.
[4] 徐迅,宋志强.国外图书馆焦虑研究进展[J].图书情报知识,2011(4):40-47.
[5] 吕玉龙.基于关键词分析我国图书馆焦虑研究态势[J].上海理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,42(4):383-388.
[6] 牛艳芬.图书馆焦虑研究简述[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(S2):216-218.
[7] JIAO Q G, ONWUEGBUZIE A J, LICHTENSTEIN A A. Library anxiety:characteristics of ‘at-risk’ college students[J]. Library & information science research, 1996,18(2):151-163.
[8] 宋志强,徐建华.图书馆焦虑心理机制分析[J].图书与情报,2012(2):34-36,87.
[9] JIAO Q G, ONWUEGBUZIE A J. Prevalence and reasons for university library usage[J]. Library review, 1997, 46(6):411-420.
[10] GROSS M, LATHAM D. Attaining information literacy:an investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill, and library anxiety[J]. Library & information science research, 2007, 29(3):332-353.
[11] JIAO Q G, ONWUEGBUZIE A J, BOSTICK S L. The relationship between race and library anxiety among graduate students:a replication study[J]. Information processing & management, 2006, 42(3):843-851.
[12] ONWUEGBUSIE A J, JIAO Q G. I hope that I am not anxious about using the library:the relationship between hope and library anxiety among graduate students[J]. Florida school of educational research, 1998, 38(1):13-26.
[13] 李永明,郑德俊.图书馆焦虑的差异性分析[J].图书馆,2017(12):37-43.
[14] VERNON N A, EVANS M M, FRISSEN I. The relationship between dimensions of personality and library anxiety in graduate students[J]. Education for information, 2016,32(4):397-410.
[15] JIAO Q G, ONWUEGBUZIE A J. Library anxiety and characteristic strengths and weaknesses of graduate students' study habits[J]. Library review, 2001,50(2):73-80.
[16] ONWUEGBUZIE A J, JIAO Q G. The relationship between library anxiety and learning styles among graduate students:implications for library instruction[J]. Library & information science research, 1998,20(3):235-249.
[17] JIAO Q G, ONWUEGBUZIE A J. Antecedents of library anxiety[J]. Library quarterly, 1997,67(4):372-389.
[18] 高跃新,金更达.图书馆知识获取环境现状分析及对策[J].中国图书馆学报,2003(6):34-37.
[19] 林贤埃.从图书馆焦虑看图书馆服务转变[J].图书馆建设,2010(5):47-50.
[20] NIEVES-WHITMORE K. The relationship between academic library design and library anxiety in students[J]. Portal:libraries and the academy, 2021, 21(3):485-510.
[21] BOSTICK S L. The Development and Validation of the Library Anxiety Scale[D]. Detroit:Wayne State University, 1992.
[22] VAN KAMPEN D J. Development and validation of the multidimensional library anxiety scale[J]. College & research libraries, 2004, 65(1):28-34.
[23] SHOHAM S, MIZRACHI D. Library anxiety among undergraduates:a study of Israeli B.Ed students[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 2001,27(4):305-319.
[24] ANWAR M A, AL-KANDARI N M, AL-QALLAF C L. Use of Bostick's library anxiety scale on undergraduate biological sciences students of Kuwait University[J]. Library & information science research, 2004, 26(2):266-283.
[25] ABDOH E S. Library anxiety among Omani and Saudi Arabian international students:a case study at the university of South Carolina, USA[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 2021, 47(2):102305.
[26] 贺伟.图书馆焦虑量表的修订及应用研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2006.
[27] 贺伟, VAN KAMPEN D J.图书馆焦虑量表的修订及信效度检验[J].图书情报知识, 2008(2):52-56.
[28] 吴汉华.公共图书馆焦虑的调查研究[J].图书情报知识,2007(5):50-55.
[29] 宋志强,薛玉,赵微.图书馆焦虑量表的构建与实证分析[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(15):77-81.
[30] 万云芳,贾舒敏,冯素洁,等北京地区高校学生图书馆焦虑测量分析——基于图书馆焦虑量表的修订与验证[J].大学图书馆学报,2015,33(3):12-21.
[31] 杨靖.公共阅览情境下图书馆焦虑量表修订与验证[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(7):72-79.
[32] 王涵,郜向荣,袁永翠.应对图书馆焦虑:基于信息素养教育的国外实践与启示[J/OL].图书馆建设:1-14[2022-05-29].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20211129.1534.008.html.
[33] MELLON C A. Attitudes:the forgotten dimension in library instruction[J]. Library journal, 1988,113(14):137-39.
[34] VAN SCOYOC A M. Reducing library anxiety in first-year students[J]. Reference and user services quarterly, 2003,42(4):329.
[35] THAYER J F, LANE R D. A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation[J]. Journal of affective disorders, 2000, 61(3):201-216.
[36] KUHLTHAU C C. Inside the search process:information seeking from the user's perspective[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991,42(5):361-371.
[37] FORNELL C G, LARCKER D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1981, 18(1):39-50.
[38] HENSELER J, RINGLE C M, SARSTEDT M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2015,43(1):115-135.
[39] KARASEK R A. Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain:implications for job redesign[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1979, 24:285-308.
[40] 姜文锐,马剑虹.工作压力的要求-控制模型[J].心理科学进展,2003(2):209-213.
[41] HÄUSSER J A, MOJZISCH A, NIESEL M, et al. Ten years on:a review of recent research on the job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being[J]. Work and stress, 2010,24(1):1-35.
[42] PODSAKOFF P M, MACKENZIE S B, PODSAKOFF N P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it[J]. Annual review of psychology, 2012,63(1):539-569.
[43] 梁兴堃.图情档研究中的回归分析:常见问题[J].图书情报知识,2021,38(3):165-176.
[44] SIMMERING M J, FULLER C M, RICHARDSON H A, et al. Marker variable choice, reporting, and interpretation in the detection of common method variance:a review and demonstration[J]. Organizational research methods, 2015,18(3):473-511.
[45] LINDELL M K, WHITNEY D J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2001,86(1):114-121.
[46] MALHOTRA N K, KIM S S, AND PATIL A. Common method variance in IS research:a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research[J]. Management science,2006,52(12):1865-1883.
[47] VENKATESH V, SYKES T A, CHAN F K Y. et al. Children's internet addiction, family-to-work conflict, and job outcomes:a study of parent-child dyads[J]. MIS quarterly, 2019, 43(3):903-927.
[48] GEFEN D, RIGDON E E, STRAUB D. An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research[J]. MIS quarterly, 2011,35(2):III-XIV.
[49] RINGLE C M, SARSTEDT M, STRAUB D W. Editor's comments:a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in "MIS quarterly"[J]. MIS quarterly, 2012,36(1):III-XIV.
[50] HAIR J F, HULT G T M, RINGLE C M, et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)[M]. 3rd Ed. Sage:Thousand Oaks,2022.
[51] DAVISON A C, HINKLEY D V. Bootstrap methods and their application[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997.
[52] ZHAO X, LYNCH J G, CHEN Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny:myths and truths about mediation analysis[J]. Journal of consumer research, 2010,37(2):197-206.
[53] HAYES A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:a regression-based approach[M]. New York:Guilford Press,2013.
[54] RINGLE C M, WENDE S, BECKER J. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt:SmartPLS[EB/OL].[2022-05-07]. https://www.smartpls.com.
[55] HENSELER J, DIJKSTRA T K, SARSTEDT M, et al. Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares:comments on Rönkkö & Evermann(2013)[J]. Organizational research methods, 2014,17(2):182-209.
[56] RÖNKKÖ M, EVERMANN J. A critical examination of common beliefs about partial least squares path modeling[J]. Organizational research methods, 2013,16(3):425-448.
[57] KLINE R B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling[M]. New York:Guilford Press, 2011.
Outlines

/

〈 〉