[Purpose/Significance] Aiming at the data quality problem in the opening of scientific data, an incentive mechanism for improving the quality of open scientific data is designed to encourage researchers to open up high-quality scientific data and actively participate in the open sharing of scientific data.[Method/Process] Drawing on reputation theory to build a game model, it proposed an incentive mechanism to improve the quality of scientific data, and introduced Baidu Wenku as a verification of the incentive mechanism.[Result/Conclusion] The establishment of an incentive mechanism for scientific data quality improvement based on reputation theory needs to meet four conditions, namely, the game is repeated many times, a good reputation can bring benefits to researchers, scientific data authorities can timely discover and punish open low-quality scientific data and complete reputation dissemination channels, and it puts forward corresponding measures on this basis.
Xing Wenming
,
Yang Zefang
. Research on Incentive Mechanism of Open Science Data Quality Improvement Based on Reputation Theory[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022
, 66(21)
: 22
-28
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.21.003
[1] 司莉, 邢文明. 国外科学数据管理与共享政策调查及对我国的启示[J]. 情报资料工作, 2013(1):61-66.
[2] 人民日报. 拔掉"数据烟囱"[EB/OL].[2022-10-27].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-04/20/content_5284240.htm.
[3] ROARMAP. Registry of open access repositories mandatory archiving policies[EB/OL].[2022-05-13].http://roarmap.eprints.org/.
[4] 宋戈, 胡文静. 国外强制性开放科学数据政策调研与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(9):61-69.
[5] 刘安然. 高校教师管理中的声誉激励问题研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2019.
[6] HARDWICKE T E, MATHUR M B, MACDONALD,et al. Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility:evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal cognition[J]. Royal society open science, 2018, 5(8):180448.
[7] SADIQ S, INDULSKA M. Open data:quality over quantity[J]. International journal of information management, 2017, 37(3):150-154.
[8] OVIEDO E, MAZON J N, ZUBCOFF J J. Towards a data quality model for open data portals[C]//2013 XXXIX Latin American computing conference. Latin:IEEE, 2013:1-8.
[9] UMBRICH J, POLLERES A, NEUMAIER S. Automated quality assessment of metadata across open data portals[J]. Journal of data and information quality, 2016, 8(1):1-29.
[10] 江洪, 王春晓. 基于科学数据生命周期管理阶段的科学数据质量评价体系构建研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(10):19-27.
[11] BYABAZAIRE J,O'HARE G, DELANEY D. Data quality and trust:review of challenges and opportunities for data sharing in IoT[J]. Electronics, 2020, 9(12):2083.
[12] 黄国彬, 陈丽. 国外科学数据质量评估框架比较研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2021(1):97-107.
[13] 刘颖, 王旋. 医学领域国际学术期刊数据出版政策分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2017, 28(8):685-689.
[14] ZHANG R, INDULSKA M, SADIQ S. Discovering data quality problems[J]. Business & information systems engineering, 2019, 61(5):575-593.
[15] 盛小平, 田婧, 向桂林. 科学数据开放共享中的数据质量治理研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(22):11-24.
[16] CHEN Q, BRITTO R, ERILL I, et al. Quality matters:biocuration experts on the impact of duplication and other data quality issues in biological databases[J]. Genomics proteomics & bioinformatics, 2020, 18(2):91.
[17] MULLER H, DAGHER G, LOIBNER M, et al. Biobanks for life sciences and personalized medicine:importance of standardization, biosafety, biosecurity, and data management[J]. Current opinion in biotechnology, 2020, 65:45-51.
[18] 夏义堃, 管茜. 基于生命周期的生命科学数据质量控制体系研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2021(3):23-34.
[19] HOLMSTR B. Managerial incentive problems:a dynamic perspective[J]. The review of economic studies, 1999, 66(1):169-182.
[20] KREPS D M, WILSON R. Sequential equilibria[J]. Econometrica:journal of the econometric society, 1982, 50:863-894.
[21] KREPS D M,MILGROM P,ROBERTS J,et al. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma[J]. Journal of economic theory, 1982, 27(2):245-252.
[22] 符加林. 企业声誉效应对联盟伙伴机会主义行为约束研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2008.
[23] 刘伟,郭捷,杨绍斌. 基于声誉理论的研发外包动态激励机制研究[J]. 技术经济, 2009, 28(11):17-21.
[24] 李国彦,李南. 创业社会网络中隐性知识转移激励模型研究——代理人市场-声誉理论视角的探索[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(7):139-143.
[25] 刘惠萍,张世英. 基于声誉理论的我国经理人动态激励模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005(4):78-86.
[26] 占小军,唐井雄. 声誉激励:公务员激励机制的新思维[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2009(4):13-16.
[27] 姜晓晖,汪卫平. 高校教师学术声誉研究:一种探索性激励机制设计[J]. 中国高教研究, 2021(4):42-47.
[28] 傅天珍, 郑江平. 国外面向科研人员的科学数据共享探析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2015, 35(2):76-81.
[29] 李业根. 网络文库用户激励机制及其对图书馆自建数据库的启示[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2018(11):76-80.
[30] European Commission. Draft European open science agenda[EB/OL].[2022-10-26].https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/draft_european_open_science_agenda.pdf.
[31] F.A.I.R. Policy statement on F.A.I.R. access to Australia's research outputs[EB/OL].[2022-10-26].https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2017-01/apo-nid306221.pdf.
[32] NSF. Dissemination and sharing of research results[EB/OL].[2022-10-26].https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp.
[33] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 国务院办公厅关于印发科学数据管理办法的通知国办发17号[EB/OL].(2018-03-17)[2020-12-26].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-04/02/content_5279272.htm.
