INFORMATION RESEARCH

Research on the Analysis Method of Large-Scale Scientific Facilities Cluster Layout Planning Based on the Correlation of Scientific Research Output: Taking the Comprehensive National Science Center in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as an Example

  • Feng Lingzi ,
  • Zhang Ruhao ,
  • Feng Kaiyue ,
  • Yuan Junpeng
Expand
  • 1 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2 Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
    3 Condition Guarantee and Finance Bureau, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100086

Received date: 2022-05-20

  Revised date: 2022-10-20

  Online published: 2023-02-09

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This study proposes an anlytical framework, which could be used to provide reference for the demonstration of the association of facilities in the planning of large facilities clusters, and help to provide a forward-looking quantitative reference for the planning and layout of large facilities, as a supplement to demand driven planning.[Method/Process] This research started with scientific outputs and applied scientometric methods to propose the large-scale scientific facilities cluster layout planning analysis framework based on the correlation of scientific research output (SOCO-LFPF)', including processes and methods such as confirming analysis objects, obtaining facility data, describing facility knowledge distribution, and analyzing facility association. This study taking the Greater bay area Comprehensive National Science Center as an example, the paper data of the same type of facilities in the world for the existing large facilities (spallation neutron source and synchrotron radiation light source) and the planned large facility X were collected, and the internal correlation of its discipline level was analyzed from multiple levels.[Result/Conclusion] The number of papers published relying on large scientific facilities continues to rise. The three types of large scientific devices have strong interdisciplinary nature, and the interdisciplinary nature of different facilities is different. The three types of facilities have different correlations. The existing facilities (spallation neutron source and synchrotron radiation light source) have high correlation and may be complementary, while the large device X has low correlation with the existing facilities. Further expert argumentation is required for layout suggestions. The method proposed in this paper is feasible and provide a forward-looking quantitative reference for the planning and layout of large-scale facilities to a certain extent.

Cite this article

Feng Lingzi , Zhang Ruhao , Feng Kaiyue , Yuan Junpeng . Research on the Analysis Method of Large-Scale Scientific Facilities Cluster Layout Planning Based on the Correlation of Scientific Research Output: Taking the Comprehensive National Science Center in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as an Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023 , 67(2) : 86 -97 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.02.009

References

[1] 王济昌.现代科学技术名词选编[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社, 2006.
[2] 梁永福, 盘思桃, 林雄, 等.大科学装置集群的协同创新与产业带动效应——以广东大科学中心为例[J].科技管理研究, 2018, 38(3):5-10.
[3] 陈套, 冯锋.大科学装置集群效应及管理启示[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 35(1):61-66.
[4] 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[EB/OL].[2022-11-24].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm.
[5] 黄振羽.大科学装置与粤港澳大湾区发展的关系分析[J].科技管理研究, 2019, 39(18):69-72.
[6] 张玲玲, 赵明辉, 赵道真, 等.依托大科学装置的科学园空间布局及对策研究——以散裂中子源为例[J].工程研究-跨学科视野中的工程, 2019, 11(4):338-348.
[7] 程晓舫, 唐磊, 夏依林.大科学装置共建共享及其对区域一体化的影响——以长三角为例[J].科技管理研究, 2020, 40(22):26-31.
[8] 张玲玲, 赵明辉, 曾钢, 等.文献计量视角下依托大科学装置的学科主题与合作网络研究——以上海光源为例[J].管理评论, 2019, 31(11):279-288.
[9] FLORIO M, SIRTORI E.Social benefits and costs of large scale research infrastructures[J].Technological forecasting and social change, 2016, 112:65-78.
[10] FLORIO M, FORTE S, SIRTORI E.Forecasting the socioeconomic impact of the Large Hadron Collider:a cost-benefit analysis to 2025 and beyond[J].Technological forecasting and social change, 2016, 112:38-53.
[11] MICHALOWSKI S.The impacts of large research infrastructures on economic innovation and on society:case studies at CERN[R].Europe:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2014.
[12] HALLONSTEN O.How expensive is big science? Consequences of using simple publication counts in performance assessment of large scientific facilities[J].Scientometrics, 2014, 100(2):483-496.
[13] HALLONSTEN O.Use and productivity of contemporary, multidisciplinary big science[J].Research evaluation, 2016, 25(4):486-495.
[14] HEIDLER R, HALLONSTEN O.Qualifying the performance evaluation of big science beyond productivity, impact and costs[J].Scientometrics, 2015, 104(1):295-312.
[15] QIAO L L, MU R P, CHEN K H.Scientific effects of large research infrastructures in China[J].Technological forecasting and social change, 2016, 112:102-112.
Outlines

/