[Purpose/Significance] Based on the summary of important issues discussed on the academic salon "Measurement and Evaluation of Interdisciplinary Research", this paper proposes the current research dilemmas and future research trend of interdisciplinary research, in order to provide reference for interdisciplinary research.[Method/Process] The main content of the salon is reviewed on four topics, which are the basic concept of interdisciplinary research, the classification standard of disciplines, the motivation, purpose and measurement of interdisciplinary research, so as to present the latest achievements and unexplored issues of interdisciplinary research.[Result/Conclusion] The current research dilemmas has two aspects:one is lacking a deep understanding of the motives and purposes of interdisciplinary research; another is the elements and nature on current interdisciplinary measurement research are homogeneous and formalized, and less research is conducted from the process of interdisciplinary activities. It is proposed that the future research should focus on the interdisciplinary activities, exploring its formation mechanisms and evaluation schemes, on the basis of focusing on analyzing and describing the dynamic mechanism and formation mechanism of interdisciplinary activities.
[1] 路甬祥.学科交叉与交叉科学的意义[J].中国科学院院刊, 2005, 20(1):58-60.
[2] 王续琨.科学学科学引论[M].北京:人民出版社, 2017.
[3] National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine.Facilitating interdisciplinary research[M].Washington:The National Academies Press, 2005.
[4] EDELENBOS J, BRESSERS N, VANDENBUSSCHE L.Evolution of interdisciplinary collaboration:what are stimulating conditions?[J].Science and public policy, 2017, 44(4):451-463.
[5] KLEIN J T.Crossing boundaries:knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities[M].Charlottesville:University of Virginia Press, 1996.
[6] ROSENFIELD P L.The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences[J].Social science & medicine, 1992, 35(11):1343-1357.
[7] 全国哲学社会科学工作办公室.跨学科研究系列调查报告选登之六跨学科研究项目的可行性分析[EB/OL].[2022-06-24].http://www.nopss.gov.cn/GB/220182/227704/15319114.html.
[8] WIKIPEDIA.Interdiscipline[EB/OL].[2022-06-24].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interdiscipline.
[9] ADAM G.Longman dictionary of contemporary English[M].3rd edition.London:Addison Wesley Longman Limited, 1995.
[10] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.国务院学位委员会关于印发《交叉学科设置与管理办法(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].[2022-06-16].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-12/06/content_5656041.htm.
[11] ISEMONGER I.Digital humanities and transdisciplinary practice:towards a rigorous conversation[J].Transdisciplinary journal of engineering & science, 2018, 9:116-138.
[12] 钱学森.交叉科学:理论和研究的展望[J].机械工程, 1985(3):48.
[13] 徐飞.科学交叉论[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社, 1991.
[14] 王续琨.交叉科学结构论[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社, 2003.
[15] CLARK B R.Perspectives on higher education:eight disciplinary and comparative views[M].California:University of California Press, 1984.
[16] 赵康.知识分类的教育价值[D].太原:山西大学, 2015.
[17] 杨天平.学科概念的沿演与指谓[J].大学教育科学, 2004(1):13-15.
[18] UNESCO.Proposed international standard nomenclature for fields of science and technology[EB/OL].[2022-06-24].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000082946.
[19] OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES.Common European Research Classification Scheme (CERIF)[EB/OL].[2022-06-28].https://www.arrs.si/en/gradivo/sifranti/inc/CERIF.pdf.
[20] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局、中国国家标准化管理委员会.学科分类与代码[EB/OL].[2022-06-28].http://c.gb688.cn/bzgk/gb/showGb?type=online&hcno=4C13F521FD6ECB6E5EC026FCD779986E.
[21] 中华人民共和国教育部.研究生教育学科专业目录(2022年)[EB/OL].[2022-10-03].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_833/202209/W020220914572994461110.pdf.
[22] 张炜.美国学科专业分类目录2020版的新变化及中美比较分析[J].学位与研究生教育, 2020(1):59-64.
[23] 赵晓春.跨学科研究与科研创新能力建设[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学, 2007.
[24] 韩双淼, 许为民, 衣龙涛.英国研究生学科专业目录:演变轨迹与启示[J].学位与研究生教育, 2019(8):71-77.
[25] CLARIVATE.Categories by group[EB/OL].[2022-06-28].https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr/browse-categories.
[26] 中国知网.出版来源导航[EB/OL].[2022-06-28].https://navi.cnki.net/knavi/.
[27] 张余.知识分类新探——关于利用《中图法》的体系和方法进行知识分类的思考[J].图书馆论坛, 2006(3):175-177.
[28] 杜威十进制图书分类法[EB/OL].[2022-06-28].https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%9D%9C%E5%A8%81%E5%8D%81%E8%BF%9B%E5%88%B6%E5%9B%BE%E4%B9%A6%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E6%B3%95/6273918?fr=aladdin.
[29] 中国图书馆分类法委员会.中国图书馆分类法[EB/OL].[2022-06-28].http://www.ztflh.com/.
[30] VAN BEMMEL J H.Medical informatics is interdisciplinary avant la letter[J].Methods Inf Med, 2008, 47:318-321.
[31] PESTON M.Some thoughts on evaluating interdisciplinary research[J].Higher education review, 1978, 10(2):55.
[32] CLARK S G, WALLACE R L.Integration and interdisciplinarity:concepts, frameworks, and education[J].Policy sciences, 2015, 48(2):233-255.
[33] BELCHER B M, RASMUSSEN K E, KEMSHAW M R, et al.Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context[J].Research evaluation, 2016, 25(1):1-17.
[34] STREETEN P.The meaning and purpose of interdisciplinary studies as applied to development economics[J].Interdisciplinary science reviews, 1976, 1(2):144-148.
[35] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R, BÖRNER K.Mapping the backbone of science[J].Scientometrics, 2005, 64(3):351-374.
[36] GEORGE J B.Nursing theories:the base for professional nursing practice[M].New York:Pearson Education India, 2011.
[37] 国家自然科学基金委员会.国家自然科学基金委员会交叉科学高端学术论坛在京召开[EB/OL].[2022-06-21].https://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab434/info79282.htm.
[38] 韩启德.遵循规律脚踏实地推动学科交叉研究与交叉学科发展——在《大学与学科》交叉学科研讨会暨专刊发布会上的总结讲话[J].大学与学科, 2022, 3(1):1-4.
[39] 袁广林.学科交叉、研究领域与原始创新——世界一流学科生成机理与建设路径分析[J].学位与研究生教育, 2022(1):13-20.
[40] 侯勇, 钱锦.思想政治教育学科交叉研究范式:现状、问题与创新[J].思想教育研究, 2021(8):50-56.
[41] RAMACHANDRAN G N.Interdisciplinary activity-essence of modern research[J].Current science, 1984, 53(7):345-348.
[42] KEYFITZ N.Inter-disciplinary contradictions and the influence of science on policy[J].Policy sciences, 1995, 28(1):21-38.
[43] STIRLING A.A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J].Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15):707-719.
[44] PORTER A L, CHUBIN D E.An indicator of cross-disciplinary research[J].Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3/4):161-176.
[45] SHANNON C E.The mathematical theory of communication[J].Bell labs technical journal, 1950, 3(9):31-32.
[46] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GLÄNZEL W.Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals:taking similarity between subject fields into account[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5):1257-1265.
[47] 陈雨.WoS与Scopus学科分类对学科学术竞争力评价结果的影响研究[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2018.
[48] 张琳, 刘冬东, 吕琦, 等.论文学科交叉测度研究:从全部引文到章节引文[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(5):492-499.
[49] 索传军.学术评价论[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社, 2020.
[50] 吴超.运用"学块矩阵"创设交叉学科知识分类体系[J].技术与创新管理, 2021, 42(4):470-476.
[51] 张静, 刘筱敏, 武丽丽, 等.基于学科期刊耦合强度的学科分类研究[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2015, 26(9):907-914.
[52] 廖宇, 沈哲思, 李立, 等.论文层次分类体系在期刊学科布局中的应用[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2022, 33(4):513-520.
[53] 索传军, 张璇, 李木子.论评价参照系的内涵、作用与构建——兼论学术谱系的功能和作用[J].中国人民大学学报, 2022, 36(4):180-190.
[54] 赵玉林.交叉科学的崛起及其形成机制[J].自然杂志, 1995(3):157-159.
[55] 周文娟.基于诺贝尔自然科学奖的学科交叉研究[D].南昌:南昌大学, 2010.
[56] 陈仕吉, 崔腾腾, 邱均平.学科交叉动力学分析研究综述[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(5):1-9.
[57] 操玉杰, 毛进, 潘荣清, 等.学科交叉研究的演化阶段特征分析——以医学信息学为例[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(5):107-116.
[58] XU J, BU Y, DING Y, et al.Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution:a case study on joint attention[J].Scientometrics, 2018, 117(2):973-995.
