Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2023 , Vol. 67 >Issue 4: 134 - 148

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.04.013

A Review on Privacy Paradox Across the World

  • Xiang Mengmeng ,
  • Sun Wanting ,
  • Feng Li
Expand
  • 1 School of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117;
    2 Jilin Province Business Big Data Research Center, Changchun 130114

Received date: 2022-06-24

  Revised date: 2022-09-27

  Online published: 2023-03-04

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Privacy paradox is a new kind of social informatics phenomenon and ‘special’ privacy disclosure behavior. By analyzing the representative research achievements of privacy paradox in the field of library and information at home and abroad, this paper systematically combs the existing research knowledge system and further looks into the future research trend, and provides some enlightenment and reference for the future research.[Method/Process] This paper retrieved and organized relevant literature on privacy paradox research at home and abroad, by means of quantitative analysis and visualization, this paper analyzed the topic, theory and methods of the study of privacy paradox at home and abroad, and constructed the framework of the research process. Finally, it discussed the future research prospects.[Result/Conclusion] The research on privacy paradox is still in the development stage, and there is still a large research space in the subdivision of research contents, the diversity of research methods and research perspectives. Based on the interdisciplinary perspectives of psychology, sociology and behavior, it is expected to become the trend of future research in this field to explore the influencing factors and formation mechanism of privacy paradox behavior from the comprehensive perspective of expanding application scenarios and refining research contents.

Key words： privacy paradox; research status; research review

Cite this article

Xiang Mengmeng , Sun Wanting , Feng Li . A Review on Privacy Paradox Across the World[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023 , 67(4) : 134 -148 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.04.013

References

[1] 中国互联网中心.第49次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL].[2022-06-08].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/gywm/xwzx/rdxw/20172017_7086/202202/t20220225_71724.htm.
[2] SPIEKERMANN S, GROSSKLAGS J, BERENDT B.E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce:privacy preferences versus actual behavior[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on electronic commerce.New York:ACM, 2001:38-47.
[3] BARNES S B.A privacy paradox:social networking in the United States[J].First monday, 2006, 11(9):5-16.
[4] 沈旺, 高雪倩, 代旺, 等.基于解释水平理论与调节定向理论的社交网络隐私悖论研究[J].情报科学, 2020, 38(8):120-127, 140.
[5] OETZEL M C, GONJA T.The online privacy paradox:a social representations perspective, computer human interaction[C]//Chi 11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems.New York:ACM, 2011:2107-2112.
[6] DIENLIN T, TREPTE S.Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? an in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors[J].European journal of social psychology, 2015, 45(3):285-297.
[7] 薛可, 何佳, 余明阳.社会化媒体中隐私悖论的影响因素研究[J].当代传播, 2016(1):34-38.
[8] 袁红, 侯雅婷.网络一代个人数据隐私悖论行为研究——以微信使用为例[J].情报杂志, 2016, 35(3):169-173.
[9] 张晓娟, 田馨滦.移动社交媒体用户隐私悖论现象的产生路径研究——基于fsQCA的实证分析[J].情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(11):92-97.
[10] 申琦.风险与成本的权衡:社交网络中的"隐私悖论"——以上海市大学生的微信移动社交应用(APP)为例[J].新闻与传播研究, 2017, 24(8):55-69.
[11] 谢兴政, 蔡念中, 黄志铭, 等.社交媒体用户隐私悖论行为影响因素初探[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(18):55-63.
[12] FOX G."To protect my health or to protect my health privacy?" a mixed-methods investigation of the privacy paradox[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020, 71(9):1015-1029.
[13] OOI K B, HEW J J, LIN B.Unfolding the privacy paradox among mobile social commerce users:a multi-mediation approach[J].Behaviour & information technology, 2018, 37(6):575-595.
[14] HEW J J, TAN G W H, LIN B, et al.Generating travel-related contents through mobile social tourism:does privacy paradox persist?[J].Telematics and informatics, 2017, 34(7):914-935.
[15] BAEK Y M.Solving the privacy paradox:a counter-argument experimental approach[J].Computers in human behavior, 2014, 38(3):33-42.
[16] ADORJAN M, RICCIARDELLI R.A new privacy paradox? youth agentic practices of privacy management despite "nothing to hide" online[J].Canadian review of sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 2019, 56(1):8-29.
[17] SHARIFF A, GREEN J, JETTINGHOFF W.The privacy mismatch:evolved intuitions in a digital world[J].Current directions in psychological science, 2021, 30(2):159-166.
[18] KIM B, KIM D.Understanding the key antecedents of users' disclosing behaviors on social networking sites:the privacy paradox[J].Sustainability, 2020, 12(12):1-16.
[19] 李贺, 余璐, 许一明, 等.解释水平理论视角下的社交网络隐私悖论研究[J].情报学报, 2018, 37(1):1-13.
[20] HALLAM C, ZANELLA G.Online self-disclosure:the privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards[J].Computers in human behavior, 2017, 68(3):217-227.
[21] CHEN H T.Revisiting the privacy paradox on social media with an extended privacy calculus model:the effect of privacy concerns, privacy self-efficacy, and social capital on privacy management[J].American behavioral scientist, 2018, 62(10):1392-1412.
[22] CHURCH E M, THAMBUSAMY R, NEMATI H.Privacy and pleasure:a paradox of the hedonic use of computer-mediated social networks[J].Computers in human behavior, 2017, 77:121-131.
[23] ZHU M, WU C, HUANG S, et al.Privacy paradox in mHealth applications:an integrated elaboration likelihood model incorporating privacy calculus and privacy fatigue[J].Telematics and informatics, 2021, 61(8):1-15.
[24] LI H, LUO X R, ZHANG J, et al.Resolving the privacy paradox:toward a cognitive appraisal and emotion approach to online privacy behaviors[J].Information & management, 2017, 54(8):1012-1022.
[25] NEYS D W.Bias and conflict a case for logical intuitions[J].Perspectives on psychological science, 2012, 7(1):28-38.
[26] WANG L, HU H-H, YAN J, et al.Privacy calculus or heuristic cues? the dual process of privacy decision making on Chinese social media[J].Journal of enterprise information management, 2020, 33(2):353-380.
[27] 董坤祥, 谢宗晓, 甄杰.移动社交商务下用户的隐私悖论[J].技术经济, 2019, 6.
[28] 孙超群.微博平台隐私悖论现象影响因素研究[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2021.
[29] XU H, GUPTA S.The effects of privacy concerns and personal innovativeness on potential and experienced customers' adoption of location-based services[J].Electronic markets, 2009, 19(2-3):137-149.
[30] 吴丁娟, 朱侯.二元态度下的网购消费者隐私悖论形成机制[J].情报杂志, 2020, 39(8):160-165.
[31] LUTZ C, HOFFMANN C P, RANZINI G.Data capitalism and the user:an exploration of privacy cynicism in Germany[J].New media & society, 2020, 22(7):1168-1187.
[32] PENTINA I, ZHANG L, BATA H, et al.Exploring privacy paradox in information-sensitive mobile app adoption:a crosscultural comparison[J].Computers in human behavior, 2016, 65(12):409-419.
[33] GUO X, ZHANG X, SUN Y.The privacy-personalization paradox in mHealth services acceptance of different age groups[J].Electronic commerce research and applications, 2016, 16:55-65.
[34] 常青青.基于隐私计算理论的社交媒体隐私悖论产生机制研究[D].广州:广东工业大学, 2019.
[35] SIMON H A.A Behavioral model of rational choice[J].Quarterly journal of economics, 1955(1):99-118.
[36] 管家娃, 张玥, 朱庆华, 等.国外社交网站隐私悖论问题研究综述与国内研究建议[J].图书情报工作, 2016, 60(22):126-134.
[37] DEBATIN B, LOVEJOY J P, HORN A K, et al.Facebook and online privacy:attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences[J].Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2009, 15(1):83-108.
[38] LEE H, PARK H, KIM J.Why do people share their context information on social network services? a qualitative study and an experimental study on users' behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk[J].International journal of human-computer studies, 2013, 71(9):862-877.
[39] TREPTE S, TEUTSCH D, MASUR P K, et al.Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? towards the "Online Privacy Literacy Scale"(OPLIS)[M]//Reforming European Data Protection Law.Netherlands:Springer, 2015:333-365.
[40] WEINBERGER M, BOUHNIK D, ZHITOMIRSKY-GEFFET M.Factors affecting students' privacy paradox and privacy protection behavior[J].Open information science, 2017, 1(1):3-20.
[41] HOFFMAN D L, NOVAK T P, PERALTA M A.Information privacy in the marketspace:implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the Web[J].The information society, 1999, 15(2):129-139.
[42] HARGITTAI E, MARWICK A."What can i really do?":explaining the privacy paradox with online apathy[J].International journal of communication, 2016, 10(4):7.
[43] CAMPBELL C R, MARTINKO M J.An integrative attributional perspective of empowerment and learned helplessness:a multimethod field study[J].Journal of management, 1998, 24(2):173-200.
[44] XIE W, FOWLER-DAWSON A, TVAURI A.Revealing the relationship between rational fatalism and the online privacy paradox[J].Behaviour & information technology, 2019, 38(7):742-759.
[45] TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D.Judgment under uncertainty:heuristics and Biases[J].Science, 1978, 185(4157):17-34.
[46] BAEK Y M, KIM E M, BAE Y.My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered:why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns[J].Computers in human behavior, 2014, 31(1):48-56.
[47] JENSEN C, POTTS C, JENSEN C.Privacy practices of Internet users:self-reports versus observed behavior[J].International journal of human-computer studies, 2005, 63(1/2):203-227.
[48] TROPE Y, LIBERMAN N.Temporal construal and timedependent changes in preference[J].Journal of personality and social psychology, 2000, 79(6):876.
[49] WILSON D W, VALACICH J S.Unpacking the privacy paradox:irrational decision-making within the privacy calculus[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on information systems.Florida:AIS/ICIS Administrative Office, 2012.
[50] WAKEFIELD R.The influence of user affect in online information disclosure[J].The journal of strategic information systems, 2013, 22(2):157-174.
[51] KEHR F, KOWATSCH T, WENTZEL D, et al.Blissfully ignorant:the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus[J].Information systems journal, 2015, 25(6):607-635.
[52] LANGDALE G W, HARGROVE W L, GIDDENS J.Residue management in double-crop conservation tillage systems[J].Agronomy journal, 1984, 76(4):689-694.
[53] ZAFEIROPOULOU A M, MILLARD D E, WEBBER C, et al.Unpicking the privacy paradox:can structuration theory help to explain location-based privacy decisions?[C]//Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM Web science conference.New York:ACM, 2013:463-472.
[54] BARTHE S, DE JONG M D.The privacy paradox:investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behaviour:a systematic literature review[J].Telematics and informatics, 2017, 34(7):1038-1058.
[55] LIYANAARACHCHI G.Managing privacy paradox through national culture:reshaping online retailing strategy[J].Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2021, 60(5):1-10.
[56] STADDON J, ACQUISTI A, LEFEVRE K.Self-reported social network behavior:accuracy predictors and implications for the privacy paradox[C]//Proceedings of the international conference on social computing.IEEE, 2014:295-302.
[57] LEE N, KWON O.A privacy-aware feature selection method for solving the personalization-privacy paradox in mobile wellness healthcare services[J].Expert systems with applications, 2015, 42(5):2764-2771.
[58] AGUIRRE E, ROGGEVEEN A L, GREWAL D, et al.The personalization-privacy paradox:implications for new media[J].Journal of consumer marketing, 2016, 33(2):98-110.
[59] DEUKER A.Addressing the privacy paradox by expanded privacy awareness-the example of context-aware services[C]//IFIP PrimeLife international summer school on privacy and identity management for life.2009:275-283.
[60] LEE J M, RHA J Y.Personalization-privacy paradox and consumer conflict with the use of location-based mobile commerce[J].Computers in human behavior, 2016, 63:453-462.
[61] NISSENBAUM H.Privacy in context:technology, policy, and the integrity of social life[M].California:Stanford University Press, 2011:143-147.
[62] SUTANTO J, PALME E, TAN C H, et al.Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox:an empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users[J].MIS quarterly, 2013, 37(4):1141-1164.
[63] KANG H, JUNG E H.The smart wearables-privacy paradox:a cluster analysis of smartwatch users[J].Behaviour & information technology, 2021, 40(16):1755-1768.
[64] AMEEN N, HOSANY S, PAUL J.The personalisation-privacy paradox:consumer interaction with smart technologies and shopping mall loyalty[J].Computers in human behavior, 2022, 126(1):106976-106976
[65] 周晓杏.大学生的"隐私悖论"[D].广州:暨南大学, 2020.
[66] 张译允.社交媒体中的隐私悖论研究——以南京地区高校大学生的微信使用为例[D].南京:南京师范大学, 2021.
[67] 濮莹萍.我国青年用户社交媒体使用中的隐私悖论行为研究[D].南京:南京财经大学, 2021.
[68] 王飔濛.边界与圈子——隐私悖论的形成机制[D].南京:南京师范大学, 2019.
[69] 陆桐.基于隐私悖论的社交网络用户隐私关注及隐私行为研究[D].北京:北京邮电大学, 2019.
[70] 唐晶晶.微信大学生用户的隐私悖论行为研究[D].郑州:郑州大学, 2018.
[71] 强月新, 肖迪."隐私悖论"源于过度自信? 隐私素养的主客观差距对自我表露的影响研究[J].新闻界, 2021(6):39-51.
[72] 强月新, 肖迪.社交网络中的隐私悖论:隐私关注、自我表露意愿对社交推文发送的影响研究[J].国际新闻界, 2019, 41(12):6-26.
[73] 朱侯, 王可, 严芷君, 等.基于隐私计算理论的SNS用户隐私悖论现象研究[J].情报杂志, 2017, 36(2):134-139.
[74] 张会平, 易可, 汤志伟.信息隐私关注对用户使用社交媒体的影响——"隐私驳论"的中国情境分析[J].情报杂志, 2016, 35(1):6.
[75] YOUNG A L, QUAN-HAASE A.Privacy protection strategies on Facebook:the Internet privacy paradox revisited[J].Information, communication & society, 2013, 16(4):479-500.
[76] MOSTELLER J, PODDAR A.To share and protect:using regulatory focus theory to examine the privacy paradox of consumers' social media engagement and online privacy protection behaviors[J].Journal of interactive marketing, 2017,39(8):27-38.
[77] SARABIA-SANCHEZ F J, AGUADO J M, MARTINEZMARTINEZ I J.Privacy paradox in the mobile environment:the influence of the emotions[J].Profesional de la informacion, 2019, 28(2):207-217.
[78] WU P F.The privacy paradox in the context of online social networking:a self-identity perspective[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2019, 70(3):207-217.
[79] TADDICKEN M.The ‘privacy paradox’ in the social Web:the impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of selfdisclosure[J].Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2014, 19(2):248-273.
[80] YU W, LI P.SG-PAC:A stochastic game approach to generate personal privacy paradox access-control policies in social networks[J].Computers & security, 2020, 102(3):102157.
[81] KUZMANOVIC M, SAVIC G.Avoiding the privacy paradox using preference-based segmentation:a conjoint analysis approach[J].Electronics, 2020, 9(9):1-21.
[82] 孙锐, 罗映宇.自我知觉理论视角下消费者隐私悖论行为研究:ERPs的证据[J].南开管理评论, 2021, 24(4):153-162.
[83] 张海汝, 全冬梅, 栾贞增.网购情境下用户隐私威胁应对悖论研究——基于应对行为理论视角[J].情报杂志, 2019, 38(12):141-148.
[84] LEE J-M, RHA J-Y.Personalization-privacy paradox and consumer conflict with the use of location-based mobile commerce[J].Computers in human behavior, 2016, 63:453-462.
[85] BANDARA R, FERNANDO M, AKTER S.Explicating the privacy paradox:a qualitative inquiry of online shopping consumers[J].Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2020, 52(1):1-9.
[86] MASSARA F, RAGGIOTTO F, VOSS W G.Unpacking the privacy paradox of consumers:a psychological perspective[J].Psychology & marketing, 2021, 38(10):1814-1827.
[87] CLOAREC J, MEYER-WAARDEN L, MUNZEL A.The personalization-privacy paradox at the nexus of social exchange and construal level theories[J].Psychology & marketing, 2022, 39(3):647-661.
[88] MOHAMMED Z A, TEJAY G P.Examining the privacy paradox through individuals' neural disposition in e-commerce:an exploratory neuroimaging study[J].Computers & security, 2021, 104(1):1-13.
[89] ZHANG X, GUO X, GUO F, et al.Nonlinearities in personalization-privacy paradox in mHealth adoption:the mediating role of perceived usefulness and attitude[J].Technology & health care, 2013, 22(4):515-529.
[90] ALEISA N, RENAUD K, BONGIOVANNI I.The privacy paradox applies to IoT devices too:a Saudi Arabian study[J].Computers & security, 2020, 96:1-40.
[91] LEE A-R.Investigating the personalization-privacy paradox in internet of things (IoT) based on dual-factor theory:moderating effects of type of IoT service and user value[J].Sustainability, 2021, 13(19):1-27.
[92] WEINBERGER M, DAN B, ZHITOMIRSKY-GEFFET M.Factors affecting students' privacy paradox and privacy protection behavior[J].Open information science, 2017, 1(1):1-18.
[93] WIRTH J, MAIER C, LAUMER S, et al.Laziness as an explanation for the privacy paradox:a longitudinal empirical investigation[J].Internet research, 2022, 32(1):24-54.
[94] AIVAZPOUR Z, RAO V.Information disclosure and privacy paradox:the role of impulsivity[J].The data base for advances in information systems, 2020, 51(1):14-36.
[95] CHO H, LEE J S, CHUNG S.Optimistic bias about online privacy risks:Testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience[J].Computers in human behavior, 2010, 26(5):987-995.
[96] ZENG F, YE Q, LI J, et al.Does self-disclosure matter? a dynamic two-stage perspective for the personalization-privacy paradox[J].Journal of business research, 2021, 124(1):667-675.
[97] BARTH S, DE JONG M D T, JUNGER M, et al.Putting the privacy paradox to the test:online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources[J].Telematics and informatics, 2019, 41(8):55-69.
[98] ALEISA N, RENAUD K, BONGIOVANNI I.The privacy paradox applies to IoT devices too:a Saudi Arabian study[J].Computers & security, 96(3):101897-101897.
[99] GLASGOW G, BUTLER S, IYENGAR S.Survey response bias and the ‘privacy paradox’:evidence from a discrete choice experiment[J].Applied economics letters, 2020(1):1-5.
[100] MURAVYEVA E, JANSSEN J, SPECHT M, et al.Exploring solutions to the privacy paradox in the context of e-assessment:informed consent revisited[J].Ethics and information technology, 2020, 22(3):223-238.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.