[Purpose/Significance] Under the background of big data, the arrival of the fourth paradigm of scientific research provides a solid data foundation and broad technical methods for information analysis. Therefore, the development of problem-centered information analysis framework and paradigm is helpful to extract information for user decision-making needs from complex data and consolidate the development of information analysis as an independent discipline. [Method/Process] This paper analyzed the problems existing in the current information analysis framework with process as the main line. On the basis of explaining the philosophical basis, subject mission and value orientation of information analysis, this paper extracted six key elements of information analysis (namely, target, context, problem, measurement, insight and decision-making) from the perspective of human thinking and cognitive movement, and constructed the TCPMID analysis framework. The operation mechanism of the analysis framework was explained with the problem as the core link. [Result/Conclusion] Based on many analysis practices, two types of information analysis paradigms are refined, namely, project-based analysis paradigm for specific needs and operational analysis paradigm for strategic practice. The former is a one-time project management process for user specific decision-making needs, focusing on the decision-making satisfaction of specific problems; the latter is a regular business activity oriented to organizational core strategy, emphasizing the accumulation of organizational core strategic resources and the adaptability to context changes. The elements in TCPMID framework are interrelated, and the decision-making is the feedback mechanism to realize the loop iteration of the analysis process and ensure the scientificity and effectiveness of information analysis. It emphasizes the binding of context to information analysis, the central position of communication between users and analysts, the business process testability of analysis results, and the leading role of problem solutions in user decision-making.
[1] 韩毅,李红.大数据语境下情报学的坚守与拓展[J].图书情报工作, 2015, 59(5):47-52, 81.[2] MARRIN S. Improving intelligence studies as an academic discipline[J]. Intelligence and national security, 2016, 31(2):266-279.[3] 马费成,冯惠玲,王余光,等. 1205图书情报与档案管理[M]//国务院学位委员会第六届学科评议组.学位授予和人才培养一级学科简介.北京:高等教育出版社, 2013:393-397.[4] 包昌火.情报研究方法论讲座[J].情报理论与实践, 1990(5):45-48.[5] 王琳,赖茂生.中国科技情报事业回顾与展望:基于情报学理论的视角[J].中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(4):28-47.[6] 情报学与情报工作发展南京共识[J].情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(11):145-146.[7] 胡昌平.信息服务与用户[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2008:4.[8] 徐敏,李广建.情报分析模型综述[J].情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(2):14-21.[9] 包昌火.情报研究方法论[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社, 1990:27-133.[10] 周军.情报研究引论[M].北京:蓝天出版社, 1999:91-189.[11] 查先进.信息分析[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2011:29-84.[12] 化柏林,李广建.面向情报流程的情报方法体系构建[J].情报学报, 2016, 35(2):177-188.[13] 高国伟,贺帆.人工智能赋能下情报人员的专业素养发展研究[J].数字图书馆论坛, 2022(4):43-52.[14] 霍朝光,卢小宾,杨冠灿,等.数据驱动的产业技术情报分析方法体系框架构建[J].图书情报知识, 2022, 39(1):73-83.[15] CLARK R M. Intelligence analysis:a target-centric approach[M]. Washington:CQ Press, 2010:8-22.[16] 祝振媛,李广建.多视角下的情报分析模型研究综述[J].图书情报工作, 2019, 63(19):136-147.[17] 杨建林.关于重构情报学基础理论体系的思考[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(2):125-134.[18] 陈愿,陈功.论大情景图式下的信息分析[J].情报理论与实践, 2008(4):495-497, 501.[19] 瞿志凯,兰月新,夏一雪,等.大数据背景下突发事件情报分析模型构建研究[J].现代情报, 2017, 37(1):45-50.[20] 钟金涛,周辉."以目标为中心"的情报分析方法在中印边境冲突预测中的应用研究[J].情报杂志, 2021, 40(5):63-68, 7.[21] 单彬.认知视角下的弱信号分析及实证研究[D].北京:中国人民解放军军事医学科学院, 2014.[22] 李艳,沈卓,陈嘉钰.情报分析的基本问题及研究进展[J].情报学进展, 2020, 13:120-164.[23] 徐芳,金小璞.认知心理学视角的情报分析过程模型构建[J].图书情报工作, 2011, 55(16):16-19, 45.[24] 王馨.从认知心理学视角看情报分析理论的前沿进展[J].情报学进展, 2020, 13:165-201.[25] 杨建林.基于构成维度视角的情报思维概念解析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2022, 48(4):52-66.[26] 钟丽萍.基于情报研究流程缺陷分析的"理想化情报研究流程模型"构建[J].情报杂志, 2015, 34(12):28-32.[27] 中国大百科全书.分析与综合的统一[EB/OL].[2022-12-01]. https://www.zgbk.com/ecph/words?SiteID=1&ID=121075&Type=bkzyb&SubID=104156.[28] 金顺福.论辩证逻辑的方法[J].江汉论坛, 1990(3):36-41.[29] 鞠英杰.论影响信息分析与预测的因素[J].情报学报, 2002(6):756-761.[30] 查先进.关于情报研究的哲学思考[J].图书情报工作, 2000(1):10-12.[31] 莫作钦.关于社科情报研究的哲学思考[J].情报科学, 1986(1):14-19.[32] 隋亥华,纪晓平.图书情报学特殊研究方法刍议[J].情报资料工作, 2010(1):39-41.[33] 王知津.情报学理论的哲学研究进展[J].图书情报工作, 2009, 53(22):5-11.[34] 徐敏,李广建.第四范式视角下情报研究的展望[J].情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(2):7-11.[35] 中国大百科全书.目标[EB/OL].[2022-12-01]. https://www.zgbk.com/ecph/words?SiteID=1&ID=26699&Type=bkzyb.[36] WILSON T D. Information behaviour:an interdisciplinary perspective[J]. Information processing&management, 1997, 33(4):551-572.[37] KOFOD-PETERSEN A, CASSENS J. Using activity theory to model context awareness[C]//Modeling and retrieval of context:second international workshop. Edinburgh:Springer, 2006:1-17.[38] 牛春华.社区应急管理人员信息需求语境分析[J].图书与情报, 2012(6):91-95.[39] 张玉峰,李敏,金燕.基于用户认知语境的个性化导航研究[J].情报科学, 2005(5):655-658.[40] 武任恒,范泽平,林亚萍.国内顿悟研究现状[J].心理研究, 2015, 8(5):15-19.[41] 李思一.为决策服务的信息分析研究[J].情报学报, 1994, 13(4):253-261.[42] 库恩.科学革命的结构[M].李宝恒,纪树立,译.上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1980:8.[43] 郑彦宁,刘志辉,赵筱媛,等.基于多源信息与多元方法的产业竞争情报分析范式[J].情报学报, 2013, 32(3):228-234.[44] 李阳,李纲.我国情报学变革与发展:"侵略"思索,范式演进与体系建设[J].图书情报工作, 2016, 60(22):5-11.
