[Purpose/Significance] This study focuses on privacy rights protest during data opening and utilization, and tries to figure out types of privacy rights protest, their potential governance risks and hierarchical governance strategies.[Method/Process] Using Octopus crawler software, this study captured 429 original tweets published on Sina blog platform from June 1, 2018 to June 1, 2022 by utilizing content analysis and discourse analysis. Additionally, this study constructed the “two-dimensional and four states” analysis framework, to analyze on specific types of privacy rights protest of data opening and utilization.[Result/Conclusion] This study finds out the four types privacy rights protest of data opening and utilization include “interest purpose-weak strategy” “ethical purpose-weak strategy” “interest purpose-strong strategy” and “ethical purpose-strong strategy”. The network platform data privacy protesting behavior has the potential risks of legitimacy, order and trust. Government ought to strengthen laws and regulations, improve organizational structure and the implement risk supervision and communication mechanisms, government should conduct hierarchical governance for administrating privacy right protest during data opening and utilization.
Dai Jiaxin
,
Huang Jing
. The Protest for Privacy Rights in the Data Opening and Utilization: The Strategies for Types, Risks and Hierarchical Governance[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023
, 67(7)
: 44
-52
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.07.005
[1] 沈国琴, 汪沛颖, 谢晓专. 美国情报融合进程中的隐私权保护发展研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2019, 40(3):46-52.
[2] 田新玲, 黄芝晓. "公共数据开放"与"个人隐私保护"的悖论[J]. 新闻大学, 2014(6):55-61.
[3] SON J Y, KIM S S. Internet users' information privacy-protective responses:a taxonomy and a nomological model[J]. MIS quarterly, 2008, 32(3):503-529.
[4] 王忠, 赵惠. 大数据时代个人数据的隐私顾虑研究——基于调研数据的分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(11):26-29.
[5] 赵金旭, 郑跃平. 中国电子政务隐私保护问题探究——基于70个大中城市政府网站的"隐私声明"调查[J]. 电子政务, 2016(7):81-93.
[6] HO D H, LEE Y, NAGIREDDY S, et al. Open community platform for data integration and privacy preserving for 311 calls[J]. Sustainable cities and society, 2022(83):103858.
[7] SAURA J R, RIBEIRO-SORIANO D, PALACIOS-MARQUES D. Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment[J]. Government information quarterly, 2022, 39(4):101679.
[8] 李睿, 张锐剑, 李文立, 等. 移动互联网环境下的隐私泄露容忍度测度方法[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(7):102-111.
[9] 祝娜, 夏榆棋. 政府数据开放视角下公众隐私顾虑的影响因素及其作用效果研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(12):60-67.
[10] 余筱兰. 公共数据开放中的利益冲突及其协调——基于罗尔斯正义论的权利配置[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 49(3):83-93.
[11] PERRY E J. Growing pains:challenges for a rising China[J].Daedalus, 2014, 143(2):5-13.
[12] 王金红, 黄振辉. 社会抗争研究:西方理论与中国视角述评[J]. 学术研究, 2012(2):41-49.
[13] GURR T R. Why men rebel[M]. London:Paradigm, 2011.
[14] 斯科特. 弱者的武器[M]. 郑广怀, 张敏, 何江穗, 译. 南京:译林出版社, 2007.
[15] 赵鼎新. 论"依法抗争"概念的误区:对李连江教授的回应[J]. 社会学评论, 2016, 4(1):49-55.
[16] 罗东. 日常抗争与中国研究[J]. 读书, 2015(6):124-130.
[17] 彭斌. 社会抗争何以可能——以反支配的权力为视角的分析[J]. 江海学刊, 2016(3):126-131.
[18] KRIPPENDORFF K H. Content analysis:an introduction to its methodology[M]. California:Sage, 1980.
[19] ROBERTS C W. Text analysis for the social science:method of drawing statistical inferences from tests and transcripts[M]. Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
[20] FINK S. Crisis management:planing for the inevitable[M]. New York:American Management Association, 1986.
[21] 邵培仁, 王昀. 社会抗争在互联网情境中的联结性动力——以人民网、南方网、新浪微博三类网站为案例[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 56(3):120-129.
[22] 亨廷顿. 变化社会中的政治秩序[M]. 王冠华, 译. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2017.
[23] 福柯. 规训与惩罚[M]. 刘北成, 杨远婴, 译. 上海:三联书店, 1999.
[24] 文军. 从"结构导向"到"关系为本":重构面向不确定性时代的全球化理论[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 53(5):159-173.
[25] 韦伯. 经济与社会[M]. 林荣远, 译. 上海:商务印书馆, 1998.
[26] 贝克. 风险社会学[M]. 何博闻, 译. 南京:译林出版社, 2004.
[27] 折晓叶. 合作与非对抗性抵制——弱者的"韧武器"[J]. 社会学研究, 2008(3):1-28.
[28] 龚文娟. 环境风险沟通中的公众参与和系统信任[J]. 社会学研究, 2016, 31(3):47-74.
