[Purpose/Significance] As one of the important measures to promote the participation of social forces in public cultural services, the purchase of public cultural services is conducive to further stimulating the vitality of social organizations and promoting the high-quality purchase of public cultural services through indepth analysis of the formation mechanism of social organizations “weak participation” in the purchase of public cultural services.[Method/Process] Based on the research method of grounded theory, this paper constructed a two-stage theoretical model of the formation mechanism of “weak participation” of social organizations in the purchase of public cultural services through layers of coding, induction and refining.[Result/Conclusion] The study finds that the generation stage of weak willingness to participate social organizations is mainly affected by such factors as insufficient participation capacity, lack of participation cognition, weak government trust, strengthened administrative pressure and weakened social space; The transition from weak willingness to participate to “weak participation” is regulated by the lack of formal institutional environment and the lack of informal institutional environment. Put social organizations under the perspective of public cultural service purchase to explore the formation mechanism of their “weak participation”, break through the existing theoretical analysis framework and research perspective on public cultural service purchase, and provide new ideas for the academic community to explore issues related to public cultural service purchase and the government to guide social forces to participate in the purchase.
Han Hui
,
Li Shaohui
. The Formation Mechanism of “Weak Participation” of Social Organizations in the Purchase of Public Cultural Services[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023
, 67(7)
: 67
-78
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.07.007
[1] 方永恒, 李今今. 我国地方政府购买公共文化服务政策:历程、困境与创新[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 34(1):130-136.
[2] 姜晓萍, 康健. 官僚式外包:政府购买公共服务中利益相关者的行动逻辑及其对绩效的影响[J]. 行政论坛, 2019, 26(4):63-68.
[3] 柯平. 建立社会组织参与公共文化服务的有效机制[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2015, 34(11):13-15.
[4] 管兵. 竞争性与反向嵌入性:政府购买服务与社会组织发展[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015, 12(3):83-92, 158.
[5] 孙九霞. 社区参与旅游与族群文化保护:类型与逻辑关联[J]. 思想战线, 2013, 39(3):97-102.
[6] 陈福平. 强市场中的"弱参与":一个公民社会的考察路径[J]. 社会学研究, 2009, 24(3):89-111, 244.
[7] 颜玉凡, 叶南客. 城市社区居民公共文化服务弱参与场域的结构性因素[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2016(2):57-66.
[8] 李少惠, 赵军义. 农村居民公共文化服务弱参与的行动逻辑——基于经典扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2019(4):84-91.
[9] 赵军义, 李少惠. 文化福利的基层样态:农民弱参与及其治理图景[J]. 图书馆建设, 2019(5):79-89.
[10] 傅才武, 王文德. 农村文化惠民工程的"弱参与"及其改革策略——来自全国21省 282个行政村的调查[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(5):54-73.
[11] 耿言虎. 冷漠的大多数:基层环境治理中居民弱参与现象研究——基于"环境关联度"的视角[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2022, 43(2):25-34.
[12] 周余姣. 保障与方向——对《公共文化服务保障法》社会力量参与公共文化服务条款的解读[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2017, 37(6):27-31.
[13] 李敏. 社会力量参与公共文化服务的律法规制[J]. 行政与法, 2016(12):45-51.
[14] 李少惠, 邢磊. 公共文化服务购买中政府与社会组织合作的可持续性问题[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(5):96-106.
[15] 高迎刚, 张博雯. 当前公共文化建设资金投入的社会化途径研究——以山东省烟台市"公益文化项目推介会"为例[J]. 艺术百家, 2016, 32(3):58-64, 241.
[16] 陈世香, 王余生. 基层治理现代化:社区公共文化服务的社会化研究——基于三个社区文化活动中心的比较分析[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 45(4):11-17.
[17] 李欢. 社会力量参与公共图书馆服务供给的项目驱动模式——佛山 市图 书馆 项目 立馆 案例 分析[J]. 图书 馆, 2019(1):101-106.
[18] 汪圣. 流失与重塑:政府购买公共文化服务的公共性问题研究[J]. 图书馆, 2021(9):1-6.
[19] 朱侃, 郭小聪, 宁超. 新乡贤公共服务供给行为的触发机制——基于湖南省石羊塘镇的扎根理论研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 2020, 17(1):70-83, 171.
[20] 耿达. 乡村公共文化空间的生成机制与发展路径——基于扎根理论的云南和顺图书馆的案例研究[J]. 中国农村观察, 2019(5):53-70.
[21] 焦媛媛, 高雪, 付轼辉. 同侪影响视角下创新社区中用户群体创新行为的形成机理研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(1):165-178.
[22] 张敬伟. 扎根理论研究法在管理学研究中的应用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2010, 30(1):235-237.
[23] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1991, 50(2):179-211.
[24] AJZEN I, FISHBEIN M. Attitude and attitude-behavior relation:reasoned and automatic processes[J]. European review of social pshychology, 2000, 11(1):1-33.
[25] ANDERSON C, JOHN O P, KELTNER D. The personal sense of power[J]. Journal of personality, 2012, 80(2):313-344.
[26] 刘伟, 肖舒婷, 彭琪. 政治信任、主观绩效与政治参与——基于2019年"中国民众政治心态调查"的分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 60(6):1-9.
[27] GOLLWITZER P M. Implementation intentions:strong effects of simple plans[J]. American psychologist, 1999, 54:493-503.
[28] ARMITAGE C J, CONNER M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour:a meta-analytic review[J]. British journal of social psychology, 2001, 40(4):471-499.
[29] AJZEN I, FISHBEIN M. Attitude and attitude-behavior relation:reasoned and automatic processes[J]. European review of social pshychology, 2000, 11(1):1-33.
[30] RYAN R M, BROWN K W. What is optimal self-esteem? the cultivation and consequences of contingent vs. true self-esteem as viewed from the self-determination theory perspective[M]. Philadelphia:Psychology Press, 2006.
[31] 宋雄伟. 社会组织参与城市社区治理的制度环境与行动策略[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2019(2):155-164.
[32] 黄晓春. 当代中国社会组织的制度环境与发展[J]. 中国社会科学, 2015(9):146-164, 206-207.
[33] 诺斯. 制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M]. 杭行, 译. 上海:格致出版社, 2008.
[34] 王崇. "互塑"理论视阈下民族地区乡村治理中的非正式制度研究[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 44(3):63-69.
