[Purpose/Significance] Open government data is of great significance to economic development and social service. Since mainland China joined the practice trend of open government data in 2012, progress and problems coexist. It is urgent to investigate its system design and study its operation effect. [Method/Process] In the quantitative evaluation part of policy text, this paper firstly mined the high-frequency words in 564 open government data policy-related texts nationwide, constructed the evaluation model of open government data system design, and combined it with the PMC index model, carried out quantitative evaluation of 29 cities’ open government data implementation schemes, and systematically compared their advantages and disadvantages. On the basis of the quantitative evaluation results of the policy text, the variables were further set from the perspective of institutional logic, resource-based theory and administrative ecology theory, and the qualitative comparative analysis method (QCA) was used to obtain four paths to achieve the good operation effect of open government data, and the robustness test was conducted by improving the consistency of PRI. [Result/Conclusion] The study finds that the average status of policy quality level of open government data is good, but the proportion of cities rated as excellent is insufficient, and the policy quality needs to be further improved. Indicators such as security protection, security system, supervision and assessment system, open mechanism, platform management, data utilization, data governance, open catalog of data resources and responsibility regulations are the main influencing factors. In addition, the policy quality and operational effect of Chinese municipal open government data system are not consistent. Data management system, financial resources, data technical ability, data platform construction and public demand are of great significance to open government data work. Resource-driven, institution-resource-driven and demand-resource-driven are the antecedent conditional configurations of high performance government data opening.
[1] 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和 2035年远景目标纲要[EB/OL].[2023-02-14]. http://www. xinhuanet.com/politics/2021-03/11/c_1127200766.htm.
[2] 郑磊. 开放的数林:政府数据开放的中国故事[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2018.
[3] 复旦大学数字与移动治理实验室. 中国地方政府数据开放报 告(2021下 半年)[EB/OL].[2023-02-14]. http://www.dmg. fudan.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2021yprovince.pdf.
[4] 陈美, 梁乙凯. 荷兰开放政府数据的隐私风险控制研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(2):169-175, 168.
[5] 夏义堃. 政府首席数据官制度的核心要义与运行分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2020(1):74-83.
[6] 赵润娣, 赵文慧, 赵晓军. 面向开放的政府数据分类分级研究——基于文本分析视角[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2022(8):40-46.
[7] 李红芹, 翟军. 开放政府数据背景下中美预算公开比较与评价[J]. 地方财政研究, 2020, 188(6):105-112.
[8] 冉连, 张曦. 地方政府数据开放全生命周期安全管理政策研究——基于全国17个省级政府的政策文本分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(8):111-118.
[9] 洪伟达, 马海群. 我国开放政府数据政策协同机理研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(5):126-131.
[10] 马海群, 刘兴丽, 韩娜. 基于关联规则的开放政府数据主题多政策协同性研究[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(4):3-8, 17.
[11] 洪伟达, 马海群. 我国开放政府数据政策的演变和协同研究——基于2012-2020年政策文本的分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(10):139-147, 138.
[12] World Wide Web Foundation. The open data barometer[EB/OL].[2023-01-05]. http://opendatabarometer.org/barometer/.
[13] Open Knowledge Foundation. Global open data index[EB/OL].[2023-01-05]. http://index.okfn.org.
[14] LUO Y, TANG Z, FAN P. Could government data openness enhance urban innovation capability? an evaluation based on multistage did method[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(23):1-16.
[15] GONZALVEZ N, NIETO L, PEREZ M. Is open data an enabler for trust? exploring the link and the mediating role of citizen satisfaction[J]. International journal of public administration, 2020, 43(14):1218-1227.
[16] ZUIDERWILK A, SHINDE R, JANSSEN M. Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives:is there a mismatch between objectives and results?[J]. International review of administrative sciences, 2019, 85(4):645-672.
[17] KIM J, EOM S. The managerial dimension of open data success:focusing on the open data initiatives in Korean local governments[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(23):1-15.
[18] ZHAO Y, FAN B. Understanding the key factors and configurational paths of the open government data performance:based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Government information quarterly, 2021, 38(3):1-11.
[19] 门理想, 王丛虎. 中国地方政府数据开放建设成效的影响因素探究——基于生态系统理论框架[J]. 现代情报, 2021, 41(2):152-161.
[20] 彭勃, 吴金鹏, 韩啸. 开放政府数据的生态系统能力:模型建构与发展路径[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2022, 23(3):4-15.
[21] 完颜邓邓, 宋婷. 我国地方政府数据开放平台的安全风险测评[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(2):119-128.
[22] 邓崧, 杨迪, 李鹏丽. 政府数据开放成效影响因素研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(9):176-183, 191.
[23] 成全, 董佳, 陈雅兰. 创新型国家战略背景下的原始性创新政策评价[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(12):2281-2293.
[24] ESTRADA R, ARTURO M. Policy modeling:definition, classification and evaluation[J]. Journal of policy modeling, 2011, 33(4):523-536.
[25] 丁潇君, 房雅婷. " 中国芯" 扶持政策挖掘与量化评价研究[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(4):34-39.
[26] 张勇进. 我国地方政府数据开放现状研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(11):19-23.
[27] 杜运周. 组织与创业领域——组态视角下的创业研究[J]. 管理学季刊, 2019, 4(3):31-41, 140.
[28] 王法硕. 我国地方政府数据开放绩效的影响因素——基于定性比较分析的研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(8):38-43.
[29] 汤志伟, 周维, 李晓艳. 中国省级政府政务服务在线办理能力的影响因素与路径组合[J]. 电子政务, 2021(5):98-109.
[30] 彭川宇, 刘月. 政府数据开放政策三维分析框架构建及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(6):12-22.
[31] 汤志伟, 龚泽鹏, 郭雨晖. 基于二维分析框架的中美开放政府数据政策比较研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(7):41-48.
[32] 庞明礼. 领导高度重视:一种科层运作的注意力分配方式[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(4):93-99.
[33] WERNERFELT B. The resource-based view of the firm:ten years after[J]. Strategic management journal, 1995, 16(3):171-174.
[34] 江小涓. 加强顶层设计解决突出问题协调推进数字政府建设与行政体制改革[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(12):9-11.
[35] 傅勇, 张晏. 中国式分权与财政支出结构偏向:为增长而竞争的代价[J]. 管理世界, 2007(3):4-12.
[36] 张楠迪扬. 区块链政务服务:技术赋能与行政权力重构[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(1):69-76.
[37] 陈美. 面向增值利用的政府开放数据平台顶层设计研究[J]. 图书馆, 2019(8):23-28.
[38] 丁煌. 行政学原理[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2007:57.
[39] 庞明礼. 公共政策学[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2020.
[40] 李梅, 张毅, 杨奕. 政府数据开放影响因素的关系结构分析[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(4):144-149.
[41] 陈美, 曹阳赤. 治理理论与开放政府数据服务的社会参与[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(6):129-136.
[42] 孟天广, 赵娟. 大数据时代网络搜索行为与公共关注度:基于2011-2017年百度指数的动态分析[J]. 学海, 2019(3):41-48.
[43] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6):155-167.
[44] RAGIN C C. Redesining social inquiry:fuzzy set and beyond[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2008:190-213.
[45] 沈荣华. 提高政府公共服务能力的思路选择[J]. 中国行政管理, 2004(1):29-32.
[46] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9):1312-1323.
[47] 马亮. 四位一体的国家治理——制度优势何以转化为治理效能?[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 57(1):1-12.
[48] 谭海波, 范梓腾, 杜运周. 技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设——一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(9):81-94.
