Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2023 , Vol. 67 >Issue 8: 30 - 39

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.08.003

SPECIAL TOPIC: Research on Open Government Data Use,Institutional Evaluation and Privacy Risk Control

Factors Influencing Willingness to Use Open Government Data: A Meta-Analysis

  • Chen Mei ,
  • Cao Yuyan ,
  • Chen Chaobing
Expand
  • 1 School of Public Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073;
    2 School of Public Administration, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130

Received date: 2022-11-02

  Revised date: 2023-01-05

  Online published: 2023-04-25

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The purpose of this paper is to explore the factors influencing users’ intention to use open government data and provide some theoretical and practical implications for the work of open government data in different countries. [Method/Process] This paper makes a meta-analysis of 29 quantitative studies to explore the determinants of using open government data, and conducts a meta-regression for the level of cultural and technological development. [Result/Conclusion] The results show that perceived usefulness, social influence, performance expectation, effort expectation, system quality, relative advantage and trust are the main factors. At the same time, culture and technology also play an important moderating role in the use of open government data.

Key words： open government data; use intention; meta-analysis; meta regression

Cite this article

Chen Mei , Cao Yuyan , Chen Chaobing . Factors Influencing Willingness to Use Open Government Data: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023 , 67(8) : 30 -39 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.08.003

References

[1] 陈美. 美国开放政府数据的保障机制研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(7):148-153.
[2] 谭海波, 张楠. 政府数据开放:历史、价值与路径[J]. 学术论坛, 2016, 39(6):31-34, 53.
[3] 陈美. 政府数据开放利用:内涵、进展与启示[J]. 图书馆建设, 2017(9):44-50, 77.
[4] HUNG M J, HSIEH W H. Examining the perception and use of open crime data from a citizen perspective[J]. Chinese public administration review, 2019, 10(1):46-59.
[5] WIRTZ B W, WEYERE J C, ROSCH M. Citizen and open government:an empirical analysis of antecedents of open government data[J]. International journal of public administration, 2018, 41(4):308-320.
[6] DE SOUZA A A C, D'ANGELO M J, LIMAi FiLHOl R N. Effects of predictors of citizens' attitudes and Intention to use open government data and government 2.0[J]. Government information quarterly, 2022, 39(2):101663.
[7] YANG Z, HA S, KANKANHALLI A, et al. Understanding the determinants of the intention to innovate with open government data among potential commercial innovators:a risk perspective[J/OL]. Internet research, 2022.[2022-12-15]. https://www.emerald.com/insight/1066-2243.htm.
[8] ISLAM M T, SHAMIN MD, KHAYER A, et al. Exploring continuance usage intention toward open government data technologies:an integrated approach[J/OL]. Vine journal of information and knowledge management systems, 2021.[2022-12-09]. https://www.emerald.com/insight/2059-5891.htm.
[9] LNENICKA M, NIKIFOROVA A, SAXENA S, et al. Investigation into the adoption of open government data among students:the behavioural intention-based comparative analysis of three countries[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2022, 74(3):549-567.
[10] JANSSEN M, CHARALABIDIS Y, ZUIDERWIJK A. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government[J]. Information systems management, 2012, 29(4):258-268.
[11] ZHAO Y, NI Q, ZHOU R. What factors influence the mobile health service adoption? a meta-analysis and the moderating role of age[J]. International journal of information management, 2018, 43(12):342-350.
[12] 严炜炜, 陈若瑜, 张敏. 基于元分析的在线知识付费意愿影响因素研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(2):204-212.
[13] ZHANG M, ZHAO X, XUE Y, et al. A meta-analysis of how the culture and technical development level influence citizens' adoption of m-government[J/OL]. International review of administrative sciences, 2021.[2022-12-21]. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00208523211057358.
[14] OLESEN K, WOOD L C, CHONG J L L. Citizen adoption in e-government systems:a meta analysis[J]. Journal of global information management, 2021, 29(6):1-28.
[15] PETTER S, MCLEAN E R. A meta-analytic assessment of the delone and mclean IS success model:an examination of IS success at the individual level[J]. Information & management, 2009, 46(3):159-166.
[16] ALATTA J. User perception of the US open government data success factors[D]. Minneapolis:Minnesota Walden University, 2020.
[17] TALUKDER M S, SHEN L, TALUKDER M F H, et al. Determinants of user acceptance and use of open government data (OGD):an empirical investigation in Bangladesh[J]. Technology in society, 2019, 56(2):147-156.
[18] ATHMAY A, FANTAZY K, KUMAR V. E-government adoption and user's satisfaction:an empirical investigation[J]. Euromed journal of business, 2016, 11(1):57-83.
[19] CARTOFEANU C, MACRINICI D. Evaluating the success of egovernment open data platform at increasing transparency in Moldova:from the perspectives of journalists and developers[EB/OL].[2022-12-22]. https://www.academia.edu/34434311/Evaluating_the_Success_of_eGovernment_OpenData_Platform_at_Increasing_Transparency_in_Moldova_from_the_Perspectives_of_Journalists_and_Developers.
[20] 朱春奎, 童佩珊, 陈彦桦. 基于TAM和BRA整合模型的政府数据开放意愿与行为研究[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(2):68-78.
[21] WIRTZ B W, WEYERER J C, ROSCH M. Open government and citizen participation:an empirical analysis of citizen expectancy towards open government data[J]. International review of administrative sciences, 2019, 85(3):566-586.
[22] JURISCH M C, KAUTZ M, WOLF P, et al. An international survey of the factors influencing the intention to use open government[C]//201548th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Hawaii:IEEE, 2015:2188-2198.
[23] WEERAKKODY V, KAPOOR K, BALTA M E, et al. Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data[J]. Production planning & control, 2017, 28(11/12):891-905.
[24] VENKATESH V, MORRIS M G, Davis G B, et al. User acceptance of information technology:toward a unified view[J]. MIS quarterly, 2003, 27(3):425-478.
[25] SAXENA S, JANSSEN M. Examining open government data (OGD) usage in India through UTAUT framework[J]. Foresight, 2017, 19(4):421-436.
[26] ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M, DWIVEDI Y K. Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies:drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology[J]. Government information quarterly, 2015, 32(4):429-440.
[27] WEERAKKODY V, IRANI Z, KAPOOR K, et al. Open data and its usability:an empirical view from the citizen's perspective[J]. Information systems frontiers, 2017, 19(2):285-300.
[28] KHURSHID M M, ZAKARIA N H, RASHID A, et al. Examining the factors of open government data usability from academician's perspective[J]. International journal of information technology project management, 2018, 9(3):72-85.
[29] HORST M, KUTTSCHREUTER M, GUTTELING J M. Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in the Netherlands[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2007, 23(4):1838-1852.
[30] FITRIANI W R, HIDAYANTO A N, SANDHYADUHITA P I, et al. Determinants of intention to use open data Website:an insight from Indonesia[J]. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2019, 11(2):96-120.
[31] BOSTROM R P, HEINEN J S. MIS problems and failures:a sociotechnical perspective. part I:the causes[J]. MIS quarterly, 1977, 1(3):17-32.
[32] HOODA A, GUPTA P, JEYARAJ A, et al. The effects of trust on behavioral intention and use behavior within e-government contexts[J/OL]. International journal of information management, 2022.[2022-12-23]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268401222000871.
[33] RINGQUIST E. Meta-analysis for public management and policy[M]. San Francisco:John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[34] NUNNALLY J C. Psychometric theory[M]. 2nd ed. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1978:83.
[35] 李华锋, 段加乐, 孙晓宁. 基于元分析的用户在线信息搜寻意愿影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(19):84-95.
[36] GEORGE B, WALKER R M, MONSTER J. Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? a meta-analysis[J]. Public administration review, 2019, 79(6):810-819.
[37] COHEN J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences[M]. New York:Routledge, 2013.
[38] ZHANG J, LI H, YANG K. A meta-analysis of the government performance-trust link:taking cultural and methodological factors into account[J]. Public administration review, 2022, 82(1):39-58.
[39] ZHAO F, SHEN K N, COLLIER A. Effects of national culture on e-government diffusion-a global study of 55 countries[J]. Information & management, 2014, 51(8):1005-1016.
[40] HOFSTEDE G, HOFSTEDE G J, MINKOV M. Cultures and organizations:software of the mind[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 2005.
[41] HUMPHREY N M. Emotional labor and employee outcomes:a metaanalysis[J]. Public administration, 2021, 100(1):72-97.
[42] 马鸿佳, 肖彬, 王春蕾. 大数据能力影响因素及效用:基于元分析的研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论:1-19[2022-05-23]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20211022.1029.004.html.
[43] 刘智强, 葛靓, 王凤娟. 组织任期与员工创新:基于地位属性和文化差异的元分析[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015, 18(6):4-15.
[44] 盛小平, 杨智勇. 开放科学、开放共享、开放数据三者关系解析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(17):15-22.
[45] 谭必勇, 陈艳. 我国开放政府数据平台数据质量研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(11):99-105.
[46] 完颜邓邓, 陶成煦. 政府数据开放平台用户协议合规性评估[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2021, 41(7):116-124.
[47] 周庆山, 蒋天骥. 欧洲各国政府信息公开法中的豁免公开范围比较分析[J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37(12):10-18.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.