Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2023 , Vol. 67 >Issue 8: 83 - 93

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.08.008

THEORETICAL STUDY

The Protection of Open Government Data Security Through International Trade and Economic Treaties: Origins, Models and China’s Choice

  • Zhang Qianwen ,
  • Zhang Wenyi
Expand
  • School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031

Received date: 2022-09-13

  Revised date: 2022-11-16

  Online published: 2023-04-25

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] The participation of open government data in international economic and trade cooperation is conductive to promoting the development of digital economy, but there are security risks in the process of data transmitted abroad and used. Exploring the origins and models of securing open government data in international trade and economic treaties, this paper aims to provide security guarantees for China’s open government data participating in international trade and economic cooperation. [Method/Process] The research issue of this paper was introduced from the cross-border cooperation case of open government data between the Government of Zimbabwe and Chinese enterprise Cloudwalk. Based on Open Government Data promotion and limitation provisions, security exceptions provisions and dispute settlement provisions in international economic and trade treaties, this paper examined the modes of guaranteeing the security of open government data in existing international economic and trade treaties. [Result/Conclusion] The international trade and economic treaties guaranteeing the security of open government data are broadly divided into two models: “openness promotion with limited exceptions model” and “balanced openness with restricted means model”. From the perspective of coordinating domestic rule of law and foreign-related rule of law, it proposes to build Chinese model based on the restricted balance model, to promote Chinese model by relying on the Digital Silk Road as the main approach, to strengthen international cooperation in digital technology, and to coordinate international obligations to secure China’s open government data on the basis of improved domestic legislation.

Key words： data security; personal privacy; open government data; international economic and trade treaties; international economic and trade cooperation

Cite this article

Zhang Qianwen , Zhang Wenyi . The Protection of Open Government Data Security Through International Trade and Economic Treaties: Origins, Models and China’s Choice[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023 , 67(8) : 83 -93 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.08.008

References

[1] UNITED NATIONS. 2020 United Nations e-government survey[R/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2020-Survey/2020%20UN%20E-Government%20Survey%20(Full%20Report).pdf.
[2] 黄如花, 陈闯. 美国政府数据开放共享的合作模式[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(19):6-14.
[3] 王丹. 开启中国人工智能技术出口首次尝试——两江新区云从科技与津巴布韦达成战略合作[EB/OL].[2022-11-15]. http://www.liangjiang.gov.cn/content/2018-03/27/content_420374.htm.
[4] FRISBY J. Cybersecurity exposure index 2020[EB/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://passwordmanagers.co/cybersecurity-exposureindex/.
[5] KUCERA J, CHLAPEK D. Benefits and risks of open government data[J]. Journal of systems integration, 2014, 5(1):30-41.
[6] ATTARD J, ORLANDI F, AUER S. Value creation on open government data[C]//HICSS. 201649th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Danvers:IEEE, 2016:2605-2614.
[7] SAFAROV I, MEIJER A, GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN S. Utilization of open government data:a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users[J]. Information polity, 2017, 22(1):1-24.
[8] DUTTON W, GUERRA G A, ZIZZO D J, et al. The cyber trust tension in e-government:balancing identity, privacy, security[J]. Information polity, 2005, 10(1/2):13-23.
[9] BURDON M. Commercializing public sector information privacy and security concerns[J]. IEEE technology and society magazine, 2009, 28(1):34-40.
[10] JANSSEN M, CHARALABIDIS Y, ZUIDERWIJK A. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government[J]. Information systems management, 2012, 29(4):258-268.
[11] BENO M, FIGL K, UMBRICH J, et al. Open data hopes and fears:determining the barriers of open data[C]//CeDEM. 2017 Conference for e-democracy and open government. Danvers:IEEE, 2017:69-81.
[12] MEIJER R, CONRADIE P, CHOENNI S. Reconciling contradictions of open data regarding transparency, privacy, security and trust[J]. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 2014, 9(3):32-44.
[13] UBALDI B. Open Government Data:towards empirical analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives[J/OL]. OECD working papers on public governance[2022-11-15]. https://read.oecdilibrary.org/governance/open-government-data_5k46bj4f03s7-en#page1.
[14] HARDY K, MAURUSHAT A. Opening up government data for big data analysis and public benefit[J]. Computer law & security review, 2017, 33(1):30-37.
[15] 陈美. 美国开放政府数据的保障机制研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(7):148-153.
[16] 陈尚龙. 论政府数据开放的理论基础[J]. 理论与改革, 2016(6):104-107.
[17] 郑磊. 开放政府数据的价值创造机理:生态系统的视角[J]. 电子政务, 2015(7):2-7.
[18] 沈晶, 胡广伟. 利益相关者视角下政府数据开放价值生成机制研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(12):92-97.
[19] 付熙雯, 郑磊. 开放政府数据的价值:研究进展与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(9):122-132.
[20] 肖卫兵. 论我国政府数据开放的立法模式[J]. 当代法学, 2017, 31(3):42-49.
[21] 刘权. 政府数据开放的立法路径[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 43(1):92-102.
[22] 张明. 当前国际政府数据开放进程[J]. 国际研究参考, 2014(9):25-28, 33.
[23] 王本刚, 马海群. 开放数据安全问题政策分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(9):25-29.
[24] 张晓娟, 王文强, 唐长乐. 中美政府数据开放和个人隐私保护的政策法规研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(1):38-43.
[25] 黄如花, 刘龙. 我国政府数据开放中的个人隐私保护问题与对策[J]. 图书馆, 2017(1):1-5.
[26] 迪莉娅. 政府数据深度开放中的个人数据保护问题研究[J]. 图书馆, 2016(6):54-58, 64.
[27] 陈美. 德国开放政府数据中的个人隐私保护研究[J]. 图书馆, 2018(8):11-16.
[28] 陈美. 澳大利亚政府开放数据中的个人隐私保护研究[J]. 图书馆, 2019(6):28-35.
[29] 陈朝兵, 郝文强. 国内外政府数据开放中的个人隐私保护研究述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(8):141-150.
[30] 陈美. 国家信息安全协同治理:美国的经验与启示[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(2):10-14.
[31] 曹雨佳, 黄伟群. 政府数据开放生态系统构建:以数据安全为视角[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2016(10):20-24, 32.
[32] 丁红发, 孟秋晴, 王祥, 等. 面向数据生命周期的政府数据开放的数据安全与隐私保护对策分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(7):151-159.
[33] 宋华琳, 郑琛. 论政府数据开放中的数据安全保护制度[J]. 中国司法, 2022(3):48-54.
[34] 侯晓丽, 彭靖, 赵需要. 政府数据开放中国家秘密的泄露风险与保护策略[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(7):53-59.
[35] 肖冬梅, 苏莹. 我国政府数据开放中的安全风险及其防范对策[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(6):112-120, 131.
[36] 廖诗评. 国内法域外适用及其应对——以美国法域外适用措施为例[J]. 环球法律评论, 2019, 41(3):166-178.
[37] MALAMUD C. Open government working group[EB/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://public.resource.org/open_government_meeting.html.
[38] AARONSON S A. Another digital divide:the rise of data realms and its implications for the WTO[J]. Journal of international economic law, 2018, 21(2):245-272.
[39] BURRI M, CALLO-MÜLLER M V, KUGLER K. TAPED:a new dataset on data-related trade provisions[EB/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://www.unilu.ch/en/faculties/faculty-of-law/professorships/burri-mira/research/taped/.
[40] 张倩雯, 王梓萱. 谁来认定国家安全例外——乌克兰诉俄罗斯运输限制措施案评析[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(8):40-45, 70.
[41] 张日. 数字经贸协定看亚欧新范式[EB/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://www.comnews.cn/content/2022-06/23/content_11206.html.
[42] CLEMENT J. Market value of the largest internet companies worldwide 2022[EB/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/277483/market-value-of-the-largest-internetcompanies-worldwide/.
[43] THOMSON REUTERS. The top 100 global technology leaders[R/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/ewp-m/documents/thomsonreuters/en/pdf/reports/thomson-reuters-top-100-global-tech-leaders-report.pdf.
[44] 黄敏聪. 美国政府数据开放新趋势及其对我国的启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(18):64-65.
[45] 孔庆江. 一个解决WTO上诉机构僵局的设想[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(4):197-207.
[46] 许多奇. 个人数据跨境流动规制的国际格局及中国应对[J]. 法学论坛, 2018, 33(3):130-137.
[47] 华劼. 欧盟公共部门信息再利用制度修订——兼评2019年 《开放数据与公共部门信息再利用指令》[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2021, 35(10):113-120.
[48] WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. WTO electronic commerce negotiations-consolidated negotiating text[EB/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://www.bilaterals.org/IMG/pdf/wto_plurilateral_ecommerce_draft_consolidated_text.pdf.
[49] 复旦大学数字与移动治理实验室. 中国地方政府数据开放报告——省域(2021年 度)[R/OL].[2022-11-15]. http://www.ifopendata.cn/static/report/中国地方政府数据开放报告(省域).pdf.
[50] 袁红, 王焘. 政府开放数据生态系统可持续发展实现路径的系统动力学分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(17):13-25.
[51] GAO H. Digital or trade? the contrasting approaches of China and US to digital trade[J]. Journal of international economic law, 2018, 21(2):297-321.
[52] 张倩雯, 王鹏. 利益平衡视角下双边投资协定例外条款的扩张与限缩[J]. 国际商务研究, 2022, 43(3):96-106.
[53] 方丽娟, 张荣刚. "一带一路"数字经济治理逻辑、问题及应对[J]. 理论导刊, 2020(11):70-75.
[54] 中华人民共和国外交部. "中国+中亚五国"数据安全合作 倡议[EB/OL].[2022-11-15]. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/wjbzhd/202206/t20220609_10700811.shtml.
[55] 郑荣, 张薇, 高志豪. 基于区块链技术的政府数据开放共享平台构建与运行机制研究[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(5):137-143.
[56] 何叶华. 论数据保护法的域外效力[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(5):161-168.
[57] 孔庆江, 于华溢. 数据立法域外适用现象及中国因应策略[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(8):76-88.
[58] 俞胜杰, 林燕萍.《通用数据保护条例》域外效力的规制逻辑、实践反思与立法启示[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2020(6):62-79.
[59] 张倩雯. 数据跨境流动之国际投资协定例外条款的规制[J]. 法学, 2021, 474(5):90-102.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.