[Purpose/Significance] Through the multi configuration path research on the selection strategy of library automation system, this paper provides reference experience and ideas for the implementation of system selection decision. [Method/Process] This paper incorporate the D&M information system success model into the effectiveness evaluation framework of library automation system construction in a B2B environment. Investigated 30 library automation systems in the world, and analyzed the synergistic effect of multiple influencing factors on platform user satisfaction from the dimensions of quality, environment and technology through fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). [Result/Conclusion] The research results show that the library automation system with high user satisfaction needs to have two necessary conditions: functional integrity and corporate image. There are two configuration paths for different types of commercial license products: the functional enabling path of "sound system - cloud service" and the open source service path of "functional integrity - open source - enterprise support", to put forward specific suggestions for the selection of library products.
Li Xiaojie
,
Jiao Yanan
. Research on Multi Configuration Path of Library Automation System Selection Strategy[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023
, 67(12)
: 50
-57
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.12.005
[1] 新华社.中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[EB/OL].[2023-04-30]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm.
[2] 蔡迎春.高校图书馆"十四五"规划发展环境扫描[J].高校图书馆工作, 2020, 40(5):16-19.
[3] 刘素清.从电子资源管理视角分析我国高校图书馆服务平台的发展[J].大学图书馆学报, 2018, 36(4):11-17.
[4] Associationof research libraries[EB/OL].[2023-04-30]. https://librarytechnology.org/libraries/arl/.
[5] JOINT N. Evaluating library software and its fitness for purpose[J]. Library review (Glasgow), 2006, 55(7):393-402.
[6] YEH S T, WALTER Z. Critical success factors for integrated library system implementation in academic libraries:aqualitative study[J]. Information technology and libraries, 2016, 35(3):27-42.
[7] TODD C R. Librarian as data migrator:a functional pathway from Millennium to Koha[J]. OCLC systems and services, 2018, 34(1):60-69.
[8] KATY S. Migrating to Alma and Summon:a medium sized library experience[EB/OL].[2022-12-10]. https://documents.eluna.org/1753/.
[9] ROMAINES, WANG J. When ERM met Alma:theintricacies of content management in a shared consortia landscape[J]. Serials review, 2017, 43(1):1-11.
[10] 周纲,孙宇.开创性的下一代图书馆服务平台解决方案——FOLIO[J].中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(1):79-91.
[11] 窦天芳,杨慧.清华大学图书馆一体化资源管理平台建设——以ALMA系统实施为例[J].数字图书馆论坛, 2020(5):2-7.
[12] 刘炜,嵇婷."云瀚"与智慧图书馆:以开放创造未来[J].中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(6):50-61.
[13] 余和剑,陈林毓.国内智慧图书馆服务平台比较研究[J].图书馆学研究, 2021(4):38-43, 64.
[14] 王晓翠.下一代图书馆服务平台ALMA与FOLIO的对比分析[J].数字图书馆论坛, 2020(12):2-8.
[15] DOUGLAS E J, SHEPHERD D A, PRENTICE C. Usingfuzzyset qualitative comparative analysis for a finer-grained understanding of entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of business venturing, 2020, 35:1-17.
[16] CARDOZO R N. An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1965, 2(3):244-249.
[17] 梁燕.顾客满意度研究述评[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(2):75-80.
[18] DELONE W H, MCLEAN E R. Information systems success:the quest for the dependent variable[J]. Information systems research, 1992, 3(1):60-95.
[19] The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success:aten-year update[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2003, 19(4):9-30.
[20] 程慧平,金玲.国内D&M信息系统成功模型研究现状述评[J].图书馆, 2018(5):93-100.
[21] BREEDINGM.Library systems report2015:operationalizinginno vation[J]. American libraries, 2015, 46(5):28-41.
[22] 谢蓉,刘炜,朱雯晶.第三代图书馆服务平台:新需求与新突破[J].中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(3):25-37.
[23] 池毛毛,杜运周,王伟军.组态视角与定性比较分析方法:图书情报学实证研究的新道路[J].情报学报, 2021, 40(4):424-434.
[24] BREEDINGM. Library perceptions 2021:results of the 14th international survey of library automation[EB/OL].[2023-04-30]. https://librarytechnology.org/perceptions/2020/.
[25] SCHNEIDER C Q, WAGEMANN C. 2012. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[J]. International journal of social research methodology, 16(2):165-166.
[26] FISS P C. Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of management journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420.
[27] 杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界, 2017(6):155-167.
[28] 傅平,刘华.机构库:特性、利益和软件平台选择[J].图书馆学研究, 2016(5):31-36.
[29] 张计龙,殷沈琴,张用,等.社会科学数据的共享与服务——以复旦大学社会科学数据共享平台为例[J].大学图书馆学报, 2015, 33(1):74-79.
[30] 罗鹏程,朱玲,崔海媛,等.基于Dataverse的北京大学开放研究数据平台建设[J].图书情报工作, 2016, 60(3):52-58.
[31] 柴会明,张立彬,赵雅洁.国内图书馆科学数据研究述评[J].图书情报工作, 2019, 63(7):116-126.
[32] 董京祥,屈红军.下一代图书馆服务平台的选择与思考[J].数字图书馆论坛, 2021(3):51-57.
[33] 熊军.美国图书馆开源自动化系统的比较分析[J].图书馆建设, 2010(2):107-110.
[34] 原晓冬,游龙山.大数据环境下一步到位的整合型图书馆管理系统——开源Koha的中文应用[C]//第十三届海峡两岸图书资讯学学术研讨会论文集.武汉:华中师范大学, 2016:1-13.
[35] 2017海峡两岸koha中文团队技术协作研讨会在太原成功召开[EB/OL].[2023-04-30]. http://www.lib.tyut.edu.cn/info/1067/1258.htm 2017.
[36] 周义刚,聂华.新一代图书馆服务平台调研及思考——基于北京大学图书馆的需求[J].图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(2):69-78.
[37] 陈大庆.电子资源管理系统的发展及未来思考[J].大学图书馆学报, 2014, 32(3):74-79.
[38] 陈大庆.国内外电子资源管理系统研究综述[J].图书馆论坛, 2014, 34(7):100-106.
[39] 张文竹,邵波.电子资源管理系统的研究现状与演进趋势探析[J].图书馆学研究, 2019(4):10-16.
