[Purpose/Significance] This study analyzes the rank and path iteration of the imperial clan titles in the Qing Dynasty, in order to enrich the research results of the imperial clan titles in the Qing Dynasty, and provide reference for subsequent scholars to further analyze the titles system and conduct other related research. [Method/Process] This study used quantitative analysis methods to mark and statistically analyze the title roll of Examples of the Imperial Qing Festival, and based on the “Imperial Titles List” in the 13th year of Qianlong’s reign, an iterative analysis of the path of the descendants of the imperial clan was carried out. [Result/Conclusion] The research finds that the number of content items in the title roll of the Examples of the Imperial Qing Festival shows a decreasing trend from “title rank” to “title”. The temporary regulations are mainly concentrated in the Qianlong Dynasty and before, while the specific events are mainly distributed in the Qianlong Dynasty and after. The iterative analysis of the path greatly reflects the importance of the status of descendants in the Qing clan. At the same time, the strict ranking of titles, together with the way of descending and examination, and the way of inheriting titles by generations and specific times, avoid the superfluous titles of the imperial family to some extent which helped maintain the social stability of the Qing Dynasty.
Song Xueyan
,
Zhang Weimin
,
Yang Fangfang
,
Zhang Xiangqing
. A Study on the Ranking of Imperial Titles in Qing Dynasty from the Perspective of Data Analysis: Knowledge Discovery Based on the Examples of the Imperial Qing Festival[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023
, 67(12)
: 114
-123
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.12.011
[1] 王浩淼,徐梓又.明清宗室爵位封、袭特点的比较[J].满族研究, 2021(3):51-59.
[2] 郑永华.清代宗室世子考[J].清史研究, 2013(1):150-153.
[3] 王宝红.从《钦定大清会典事例·理藩院》的用词看《汉语大词典》的释义[J].陇东学院学报, 2014, 25(2):1-5.
[4] 闫鹏.清朝宗室封爵制度发展历程探析[J].黑龙江史志, 2014(1):35.
[5] 朱洪梅.浅论清代宗室封爵制度[C]//邹爱莲.清代档案与清宫文化——第九届清宫史研讨会论文集.北京:中国档案出版社, 2008:52-62.
[6] 杜家骥.清代宗室分封制述论[J].社会科学辑刊, 1991(4):92-97.
[7] 李宝臣.清代宗室王公封爵制度考析[C]//恭王府管理中心.清代王府及王府文化国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:文化艺术出版社, 2005:246-257.
[8] 杜家骥.清代"铁帽子王"的册封原因及相关问题[J].经济社会史评论, 2019(2):94-104, 128.
[9] 郑永华.清代宗室世子为"爵"考[J].历史档案, 2015(2):70-77.
[10] 郑永华,史文锐.世子王府今何在:清代宗室世子制度与世子府制初探[C]//中国古都学会.中国古都研究(第二十八辑).西安:三秦出版社, 2015:118-128.
[11] 杜家骥.清代的世子长子问题[J].清史研究, 2013(4):120-125.
[12] 程大鲲.清代宗室贵族的封爵与谥号[J].兰台世界, 1997(4):38-39.
[13] 程大鲲.清代宗室郡王封谥考[J].满语研究, 2000(1):32-38.
[14] 程大鲲.清代宗室贵族谥号考[J].满族研究, 2004(3):79-85.
[15] 杜家骥.清代的宗室封爵及其等级差别的特殊性[J].满族研究, 1997(1):41-45.
[16] 雷炳炎.清代世爵世职承袭制度的几个问题[J].北方论丛, 2005(5):99-104.
[17] 香莲.清代蒙古王公袭职制度研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学, 2016.
[18] 赵云田.清代藩部封爵探述[J].明清论丛, 2018(2):255-275.
[19] 雷炳炎.清代旗人封爵略论[J].北京社会科学, 2003(4):143-151.
[20] 张公政.乾隆朝八旗诸臣封爵述论[J].贵州民族研究, 2013, 34(6):168-171.
[21] 雷炳炎,李昌运.清代五等爵形成问题试探[J].湖湘论坛, 2007(5):88-90.