[Purpose/Significance] Under the background of the vigorous development of interdisciplinary cooperation, exploring the configuration path of the influencing factors of the interdisciplinary use willingness of library and information science research methods and theories can provide more extensive and profound ideas for the interdisciplinary research and the promotion of discipline influence of library and information science. It also has certain theoretical and practical significance for promoting interdisciplinary cooperation and solving urgent scientific research needs and major social practical problems.[Method/Process] Taking the interdisciplinary use intention of research methods and theories of library and information science as the theme, and taking cognition-emotion-intention as the theoretical basis, this paper constructed the interdisciplinary use intention model of methods and theories of library and information science, used the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method to obtain the configuration path composition of influencing factors, and explored its composition mechanism.[Result/Conclusion] The research shows that the interdisciplinary willingness to use the research methods and theories of library and information science is the result of many factors. Using the fsQCA research method, three configuration paths are obtained and summarized as:theory, innovation collaborative configuration; theory, community collaborative configuration; subject knowledge, cross-based driving configuration. Based on the in-depth study and analysis of the linkage mechanism of the configuration path, this paper puts forward the following suggestions for the future development of the discipline:To strengthen the discipline construction and promote the transformation and upgrading of the discipline knowledge system, guided by being reality-oriented; keep balance between upright and innovative in ‘information resource management’, enhance the attractiveness of the discipline; Actively promote interdisciplinary cooperation and enhance the influence of discipline; Play the role of information exchange support, strengthen the subject community perception.
Yang Zhigang
,
Zheng Xihui
,
Liu Jing
,
Lu Zhangping
,
Su Wencheng
. A Study on the Linkage Effect of Interdisciplinary Use Intention of Library and Information Science Research Methods and Theories[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023
, 67(15)
: 94
-104
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.15.009
[1] 徐迎迎.基于引文分析的图书情报学学科交叉研究[D].蚌埠:安徽财经大学, 2015.
[2] 苏新宁.提升图书情报学学科地位的思考——基于CSSCI的实证分析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(4):47-53.
[3] HUANG M H, CHANG Y W.A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science[J].Scientometrics, 2012, 91(3):789-803.
[4] CHI R, YOUNG J.The interdisciplinary structure of research on intercultural relations:a co-citation network analysis study[M].New York:Springer-Verlag, 2013:10-20.
[5] 冯雪梅, 邓小昭.论情报学的相关学科及发展[J].情报杂志, 2008, 27(2):96-98.
[6] 马费成, 陈柏彤.我国人文社会科学学科多样性研究[J].情报科学, 2015, 33(4):3-8.
[7] 王思茗, 滕广青.图书情报学领域学科交叉及其国家差异的动态分析[J].图书情报知识, 2020(3):109-118.
[8] 杨瑞仙, 姜小函.从学科和期刊的引证视角看交叉学科的知识结构和演化问题——以图书情报学科为例的实证研究[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5):30-39.
[9] RAGIN.C The comparative method:moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies[M].Berkeley:University of California Press, 1987:5-18
[10] 池毛毛, 杜运周, 王伟军.组态视角与定性比较分析方法:图书情报学实证研究的新道路[J].情报学报, 2021, 40(4):424-434.
[11] 杜运周, 贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界, 2017(6):155-167.
[12] 苗淳, 朱鹏.金融信息服务平台用户持续使用意愿的影响因素组态研究[J].情报科学, 2022, 40(12):88-95.
[13] 肖静, 曾萍, 任鸽.如何提升制造业绿色转型绩效?——基于TOE框架的组态研究[J].科学学研究, 2022, 40(12):2162-2172.
[14] 郭洋, 谭春辉, 何文瑾, 等.科研人员间科研合作意愿的影响因素组态分析[J].情报科学, 2021, 39(8):139-148.
[15] 吴大伟, 胡小飞, 赵宇翔, 等.感知价值视角下数字健康APP用户持续采纳意愿的影响因素及路径研究:基于fsQCA方法[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(18):93-104.
[16] 汪和平, 何凯利.基于"认知-情感-意动"的研究生调剂心理变化研究[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(8):16-19.
[17] 刘向阳, 张程程.组织中员工心态的形成过程研究——基于"认知-情感-意动"理论视角[J].科技管理研究, 2011, 31(20):149-152.
[18] 李浩君, 冉金亭.高校移动图书馆用户行为意愿模型构建研究[J].图书馆, 2018(4):73-78.
[19] 熊仁江, 赵航, 段梅花, 等.城市居民电动汽车出行意愿影响路径研究——基于模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法[J].交通运输工程与信息学报, 2022, 20(4):31-41.
[20] 王月辉, 王青.北京居民新能源汽车购买意向影响因素——基于TAM和TPB整合模型的研究[J].中国管理科学, 2013, 21(S2):691-698.
[21] 郭宇, 刘文晴, 张传洋, 等.用户在线医疗社区使用意愿影响因素及其调节变量:元分析研究[J].情报科学, 2022, 40(5):19-26.
[22] 原欣伟, 窦天苗, 李延, 等.在线用户社区成员持续参与意愿的影响因素研究——基于"认知-情感-意动"理论视角[J].现代情报, 2018, 38(5):45-52.
[23] 周海花, 华薇娜, 刘婧.基于元分析的移动数字阅读用户持续使用意向的影响因素研究[J].图书情报研究, 2022, 15(1):34-42.
[24] RAAIJ E, SCHEPERS J.The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China[J].Computers & Education, 2008, 50(3):838-852.
[25] 王若宸, 母咏然, 朱学芳,等.数字人文技术研究者采纳意愿影响因素——以技术接受模型为视角[J].图书馆论坛, 2019, 39(6):1-9.
[26] 张长亮, 李竟彤, 郭宇.网络社群用户信息共享模式研究[J].现代情报, 2020, 40(4):59-70.
[27] 毛智辉, 眭依凡.跨学科教育学硕士研究生专业认同的影响因素与作用路径研究——基于扎根理论的分析[J].学位与研究生教育, 2021(6):83-89.
[28] 黄丽纯, 易思妍.初中数学游戏立体化教材的有效性研究——以提升初中生的数学学科认同感为切入点[J].中学数学研究(华南师范大学版), 2021(10):44-47.
[29] FISS P C.Building better causal theories:a fuzzy setapproach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of management journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420.
[30] 毛刚, 吕晓声, 李贺.基于社会知识论和需求理论的学科间理论交叉研究[J].图书情报知识, 2013(3):96-102.
[31] 初景利, 张颖.以信息和数据为核心构建图情档学科体系与能力[J].文献与数据学报, 2019, 1(1):21-31.
[32] 刘琼, 刘桂锋, 卢章平, 等.开放与进取:"图情档"一级学科更名为"信息资源管理"[J].图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(6):20-27.
[33] 初景利, 黄水清.从"图书情报与档案管理"到"信息资源管理"——一级学科更名的解析与思考[J].图书情报工作, 2022, 66(14):3-9.
[34] 曾粤亮, 司莉.跨学科科研合作:背景、理论研究与实践进展[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(10):127-140.
[35] 曾建勋.重视图书情报的"交叉学科"门类特征[J].数字图书馆论坛, 2021(2):1.
