Attribution of the Price Fluctuation of Digital Resource and the Countermeasures of Library

Yang Hua; Mo Xiaoxia; Xie Li

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.16.003

Library and Information Service >

2023 , Vol. 67 >Issue 16: 22 - 31

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.16.003

SERVICE RESEARCH

Attribution of the Price Fluctuation of Digital Resource and the Countermeasures of Library

Yang Hua ,
Mo Xiaoxia ,
Xie Li

Expand

1 Northwestern Polytechnical University Library, Xi'an 714000;
2 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
3 Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
4 Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100872

Received date: 2023-01-09

Revised date: 2023-04-29

Online published: 2023-08-18

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Digital resources have already domain the library resource construction which has long been troubled with the rising price problem. In the post-epidemic period, library is generally faced with the contradiction situation of decreasing financial allocation as user demands increasing, which further aggravates the dilemma of digital resources construction. It is urgent to distinct the factors that triggered price increases and explore the strategies to deal with them. [Method/Process] By literature research, this paper condensed the present digital resource price research findings into eight views which included “monopoly theory” “pricing method theory” “game theory” and so on, then reviewed them from the perspective of internal and external causes. According to the classification of the natural logic model of the attribution theory from cognitive psychology after judging the information conditions of consistency, differentiation and consistency, this paper concluded that the price fluctuation of digital resources was caused by individual and environmental factors, which individual factor was the main cause. [Result/Conclusion] We should explore countermeasures from enhancing the price research ability of library negotiators, strengthening the library alliance’s function in price coordination, and supporting new open publishing mode in the context of open science base on “monopoly theory” “pricing method theory” and “industry environment theory”.

Key words： database provider; digital resource construction; attribution theory; digital resource price; open access; group purchasing

Cite this article

Yang Hua , Mo Xiaoxia , Xie Li . Attribution of the Price Fluctuation of Digital Resource and the Countermeasures of Library[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023 , 67(16) : 22 -31 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.16.003

References

[1] 赵艳, 王超, 王译晗, 等. 后疫情时代的学术图书馆数字资源引进:现状、措施与策略[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2022(1):49-57.
[2] 肖珑. 高校图书馆数字资源引进回顾与前瞻——写在CALIS项目建设20周年之际[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019, 37(3):18-27, 66.
[3] 崔丽媛, 刘春丽. 开放获取S计划及其修订版的产生、挑战与启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(12):58-66.
[4] 图书馆·情报与文献学名词审定委员会. 图书馆·情报与文献学名词(第一版)[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2019.
[5] 李明理. " 程焕文之问" 的数据库垄断观解读[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2015(3):1-7.
[6] 秦珂. 出版商在数据库贸易中滥用许可权的反垄断法规制[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2015, 35(7):8-13.
[7] 王丽娜. 外刊数据库垄断趋势下的购销博弈[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2016(10):33-36, 81.
[8] 严英琪, 吴若溪. 图书馆与数据库商竞合博弈的数学模型及其双赢研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2015(13):59-64, 67.
[9] 魏辅轶, 檀博. 高校图书馆数字资源采购话语权的重建[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018(5):103-111.
[10] STRIEB K L, BLIXRUD J C. Unwrapping the bundle:an examination of research libraries and the "big deal[J]. Portal:libraries and the academy, 2014(4):587-615.
[11] MARANVILLE A, DIAZ K. The death of the big deal and implications for technical services(2021)[EB/OL].[2023-04-23]. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/2965.
[12] 栗冬红. "程焕文之问"的法理分析[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2016(1):18-22.
[13] 张吉, 郭晶. 高校图书馆数据库采购谈判中涉及的法律法规问题刍议[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2021, 39(4):36-42.
[14] 李佳, 张静, 邵晶. 基于DRAA集团采购的数字资源许可协议内容调查与认知度研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019(3):28- 34.
[15] 赵艳, 鲁宁, 郑建程, 等. 国外图书馆应对金融风暴及供应商涨价的策略分析及启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(5):78- 83.
[16] 肖鹏. 重建津梁:数据商眼中的"程焕文之问"[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2016, 36(5):40-43.
[17] 曾建勋. 防止数据库商形成垄断[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2016(8):1.
[18] 李翔. 国外数据商垄断环境下我国高校图书馆的出路[J]. 图书馆界, 2017(1):5-8.
[19] 罗少芬. 弱化ScienceDirect数据库大幅涨价理由的对策[J]. 情报探索, 2016(1):65-67.
[20] 颜美元. 中国知网数据库涨价之对策分析[J]. 中国市场, 2016(22):57, 61.
[21] 张洋, 常珍珠. DRAA数字资源定价模式研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2016(9):41-46.
[22] 贺波. 基于DRAA的外文数字资源定价策略研究[J]. 电子世界, 2013(22):180-181.
[23] 马丽. 高校图书馆电子资源评价模型研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学, 2020.
[24] 蓝羽. 商业数据库续订采购实践中的"知己"与"知彼"[J]. 四川图书馆学报, 2020(6):38-41.
[25] 宋瑞杰, 高波. 中爱两国高校图书馆数字资源集团采购联盟比较研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2018(2):67-73.
[26] 林宜榕, 高波. 加拿大数字资源集团采购模式及其启示[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2019(7):43-49.
[27] 董桂存. 韩国数字资源集团采购研究与启示——以KESLI为例[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2020(4):25-31.
[28] 漆月, 石璐. 基于动态规划的电子资源采购决策支持模型研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(11):27-32.
[29] 谭明君. 高校图书馆数字资源集团采购的问题及优化策略[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(11):75-80.
[30] 程焕文, 刘洪辉, 刘洪. 程焕文之问——数据库商凭什么如此狼?[M]. 北京:国家图书馆出版社, 2016.
[31] 郁林羲. 加州大学推进开放获取过程中的利益博弈分析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2020, 38(4):12-19.
[32] 杨巍, 叶仁杰, 吴元业, 等. COUNTER Release 5的新特征及其应用研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2020, 38(1):18-25, 41.
[33] 王果, 张立彬. 限制与反限制:数字时代公益图书馆应对商业性学术数据库的博弈策略选择[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(7):109-115, 139.
[34] 郑建程, 赵艳, 肖曼, 等. 学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的经费可行性研究:OA2020的启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(12):75-80.
[35] 曾建勋, 郑昂. 我国科技期刊开放获取的机遇与挑战[J]. 编辑学报, 2021, 33(4):359-364.
[36] 国际图书馆协会联盟电子资源馆藏发展关键议题:图书馆指引 2012[R/OL].[2023-06-27]. https://repository.ifla.org/bitstream/123456789/430/5/electronic-resource-guide-cn.pdf.
[37] NISO SUSHI协议:COUNTER-SUSHI实施纲要 2014[R/OL].[2023-06-27]. http://www.libconsortia.edu.cn/Standard/list.action.
[38] 科技日报. 学术界为啥不爱投中文期刊?[EB/OL].[2023-06- 27]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1677622235981415665&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[39] 亨特, 埃利斯. 认知心理学基础[M]. 北京:人民邮电出版社, 2006.
[40] 刘永芳. 归因理论及其应用[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社, 2010.
[41] KELLEY H H. Attribution theory in social psychology[C]//LEVINE D. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press, 1967.
[42] WEINER B. An attribution theory of motivation and emotion[M]. New York:Springer Verlag, 1986.
[43] JASPARS J. The process of causal attribution in common sense[C]//EWSTONEH M. Attribution theory:social and functional extensions. Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1983.
[44] 邱葵. 圕人访谈:加州大学与爱思唯尔决裂到底是怎么回事[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2020(1):86-90.
[45] 陈丹, 董鑫, 张玉洁. 爱思唯尔期刊运营模式及数字出版研究[J]. 科技与出版, 2013(2):10-14.
[46] 祝继高. 定价权博弈:中国企业的路在何方?[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
[47] RELX. RELX annual reports[EB/OL].[2023-06-27]. https://www.relx.com/investors/annual-reports/2021.
[48] ROB J, ANTHONY W, MICHAEL M. The STM report:an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing(1968-2018)[R/OL].[2023-06-27]. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf.
[49] 苏泠然. 医疗服务定价机制:现状、挑战与改革路径[J]. 经济与管理, 2021, 35(11):1-7.
[50] 林崇德. 心理学大辞典[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社, 2003.
[51] Eigenfactor index of open access fees[EB/OL].[2023-06-27]. http://www.eigenfactor.org/projects/openAccess.
[52] 王文元, 夏伯忠. 新编会计大辞典[M]. 沈阳:辽宁人民出版社, 1991.
[53] 王元杰, 应宽, 季方, 等. 开放存取出版的收入模式与商业模式分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(8):863-873.
[54] 庞鸿藻. 国际市场营销[M]. 北京:对外经济贸易大学出版社, 2006.
[55] 中国科学院文献情报中心. GoOA[EB/OL].[2023-06-27]. http://gooa.las.ac.cn/APCheck/.
[56] DRAA集团采购数字资源综合评价实施办法(试行)[EB/OL].[2023-06-27]. http://www.libconsortia.edu.cn/Infodownload/getAllType.action.
[57] Participating consortia. ICOLC[EB/OL].[2023-06-27]. https://icolc.net/participating-consortia.
[58] 高校图书馆数字资源采购联盟[EB/OL].[2023-06-27]. http://www.libconsortia.edu.cn/index.action.
[59] 华经情报网. 中国茧丝绸行业发展现状及趋势分析[J]. 纺织检测与标准, 2021, 7(1):48-49.
[60] 中国出版协会[EB/OL].[2023-06-27]. http://www.pac.org.cn/hangyeyanjiu/diaoyanbaogao/index_2.html.
[61] 申雅琪, 张轶华, 郭晶, 等. 经费不确定形势下高校图书馆文献信息资源建设应对策略[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2021, 39(3):40-45.
[62] 孟雁北. 竞争法[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2004.
[63] 刘兹恒, 包心萍. 国外数据库商业版权模式及高校图书馆的对策[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2015, 35(1):25-30.
[64] 祝继高. 定价权博弈:中国企业的路在何方?[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
[65] IFLA. 10 years of the IFLA open access statement:a call to action[R/OL].[2023-06-27]. https://repository.ifla.org/bitstream/123456789/2029/1/IFLA_OAStatement_2022_FINAL_4.pdf.
[66] JANELISE F, TANIA G, PHILIPPE C, et al. Want a better h-index? -all you need to know about copyright and open access[J]. Orthopaedics & traumatology:surgery & research, 2020, 106(8):1475-1480.
[67] VLOKHOVEN H V. The effect of open access on research quality[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(2):751-756.
[68] PAPIA S. Open access publication:academic colonialism or knowledge philanthropy?[J]. Geoforum, 2021, 118(1):203-206.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References