INFORMATION RESEARCH

Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Researchers’ Research Fields Shifts: An Empirical Study Based on NSFC Project Principal Investigators

  • Shang Yuanyuan ,
  • Zhang Lin ,
  • Cao Zhe ,
  • Huang Ying
Expand
  • 1 Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Evaluation Studies, Beijing 100732;
    2 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    3 Center for Science, Technology & Education Assessment(CSTEA), Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    4 Centre for R&D Monitoring(ECOOM) and Department of MSI, KU Leuven B-3000

Received date: 2023-01-16

  Revised date: 2023-05-15

  Online published: 2023-08-18

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] In a context of continuous interdisciplinary and disciplinary integration, it is increasingly common for researchers to switch their research fields. The aim of this study is to systematically and multi-dimensionally reveal the regular characteristics of research fields shifts among Chinese researchers, which is important to contribute to a deeper understanding of the research fields shifts of Chinese researchers. [Method/Process] This study took the principal investigators (PIs) of NSFC projects as the research object and investigated the three-dimensional characteristics of research fields shifts among PIs through changes in the disciplinary codes of research project applications. [Result/Conclusion] The results show that there is considerable and already relatively frequent shift in the research fields within the group of PIs, and the practice of shifting research fields multiple times has also reached a certain scale. Meanwhile, results reveal the characteristics of the phase, continuity, and directionality of the PIs’ shift in their research fields. In terms of phase, more than half of the shift in PIs research fields occurs more often in the early stages of their research project careers; In terms of continuity, more than 52% of PIs have experienced shift in their research fields while maintaining the continuity of their research projects, and a certain proportion of PIs have experienced shift in their research fields after a long period of interruption in their research projects; In terms of directionality, the inflow and outflow of PIs between different research fields show three main characteristics: concentration and fragmentation, proximity shift, and unidirectional and bidirectional. The results provide valuable insights for relevant managers to design specific management strategies and funding measures for researchers who have experienced shifts in their research fields.

Cite this article

Shang Yuanyuan , Zhang Lin , Cao Zhe , Huang Ying . Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Researchers’ Research Fields Shifts: An Empirical Study Based on NSFC Project Principal Investigators[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023 , 67(16) : 64 -75 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.16.007

References

[1] KUHN T S, EPSTEIN J. The essential tension[M]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1977.
[2] DE DOMENICO M, OMODEI E, ARENAS A. Quantifying the diaspora of knowledge in the last century[J]. Applied network science, 2016, 1(1):1-13.
[3] TRUC A. The disciplinary mobility of core behavioral economists[EB/OL].[2023-06-22]. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3919485
[4] LAUDEL G, GLÄSER J. From apprentice to colleague:the metamorphosis of early career researchers[J]. Higher education, 2008, 55(3):387-406.
[5] LE PAIR C. Switching between academic disciplines in universities in the Netherlands[J]. Scientometrics, 1980, 2(3):177-191.
[6] JIA T, WANG D, SZYMANSKI B K. Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution[J]. Nature human behaviour, 2017, 1(4):1-7.
[7] YU X, SZYMANSKI B K, JIA T. Become a better you:correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(3):101193.
[8] ZENG A, SHEN Z, ZHOU J, et al. Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1):1-11.
[9] PIERCE S J. Boundary Crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50:271-279.
[10] 步一, 黄圣智, 黄永, 等. 学者研究主题演化的时空测度:速度、覆盖度和迂回度[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(24):84-91.
[11] VAN HOUTEN J, VAN VUREN H, LE PAIRS C, et al. Migration of physicists to other academic disciplines:situation in the Netherlands[J]. Scientometrics, 1983, 5(4):257-267.
[12] PRAMANIK S, GORA S T, SUNDARAM R, et al. On the migration of researchers across scientific domains[C]//Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on Web and social media. California:AAAI Press, 2019.
[13] MA Y, SONG L, JI Z, et al. Scholar's career switch adhesive with research topics:an evidence from China[J]. Physica a:statistical mechanics and its applications, 2020, 557:124959.
[14] SUN Y, LIVAN G, MA A, et al. Interdisciplinary researchers attain better long-term funding performance[J]. Communications physics, 2021, 4(1):1-7.
[15] 李峰, 朱丽红. 工科学者的研究选题策略问题研究——以水利工程领域为例[J]. 竞争情报, 2022, 18(1):29-37.
[16] WU J, JIN M, DING X-H. Diversity of individual research disciplines in scientific funding[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(2):669-686.
[17] SHAO Z Y, LI Y M, HUI F, et al. Interdisciplinarity research based on NSFC-sponsored projects:a case study of mathematics in Chinese universities[J]. PloS one, 2018, 13(7):e0201577.
[18] 吴江, 金妙. 基于基金代码共现的学科知识流动网络研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(6):23-28.
[19] 吴江, 金妙, 陈君. 基金视角下的学科知识流动网络构建与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(8):79-85.
[20] 刘娟, 王倩倩, 成舒云, 等. 我国青年社科基金负责人连续受资助状况分析[J]. 情报探索, 2018(4):52-58.
Outlines

/

〈 〉