INFORMATION RESEARCH

Study on the Change of Users’ Information Search Tactic from the Perspective of Metacognitive Regulation

  • Song Xiaoxuan ,
  • Liu Chang ,
  • Lu Wenyi
Expand
  • 1 College of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095;
    2 Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received date: 2023-05-04

  Revised date: 2023-07-30

  Online published: 2023-12-22

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] It proposes the construction mode of virtual learning commons in university libraries to complement the construction of virtual space, reconstructs the online learning support service system, and improves its effectiveness. [Method/Process] Firstly, it analyzed the concept and the current research of virtual learning commons in university libraries, and then took knowledge flow as a clue to propose the learning process oriented virtual learning commons architecture around the cycle of knowledge transformation, so as to solve users’ needs of ubiquitous and personalized learning. [Result/Conclusion] With personal space and knowledge community as the main modules, virtual learning commons provides online learning support services that go deep into the process of knowledge transformation and effectively promote knowledge flow and value-added.

Cite this article

Song Xiaoxuan , Liu Chang , Lu Wenyi . Study on the Change of Users’ Information Search Tactic from the Perspective of Metacognitive Regulation[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023 , 67(23) : 89 -98 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.23.008

References

[1] BATES M J. Where should the person stop and the information search interface start?[J]. Information processing & management, 1990, 26(5): 575-591.
[2] 吴丹, 梁少博, 冉爱华.大学生用户移动搜索策略研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(3): 55-73. (WU D, LIANG S B, RAN A H. Mobile search strategies of college students [J]. Journal of library science in China, 2016, 42(3): 55-73.)
[3] WILDEMUTH B M, KELLY D, BOETTCHER E, et al. Examining the impact of domain and cognitive complexity on query formulation and reformulation[J]. Information processing & management, 2018, 54(3): 433-450.
[4] RUTTER S, BLINZLER V, YE C, et al. Search tactics used in solving everyday how-to technical tasks: repertoire, selection and tenacity[J]. Information processing & management, 2019, 56(3): 919-938.
[5] XIE I. Interactive information retrieval in digital environments[M]. Hershey: IGI Global, 2008.
[6] XIE I, JOO S. Transitions in search tactics during the Web‐based search process[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 11(61): 2188-2205.
[7] XIE I, JOO S. Factors affecting the selection of search tactics: tasks, knowledge, process, and systems[J]. Information processing & management, 2012, 48(2): 254-270.
[8] 袁红, 吴艳萍.选择与转换:复杂任务情境下用户搜索策略的运用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(5): 93-98, 170. (YUAN H, WU Y P. Choice and transformation: the application of user search strategies in complex task situations [J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2019, 42(5): 93-98, 170.)
[9] SAVOLAINEN R. Information seeking and searching strategies as plans and patterns of action: a conceptual analysis[J]. Journal of documentation, 2016, 72(6): 1154-1180.
[10] 董奇.论元认知[J]. 北京师范大学学报, 1989(1): 68-74. (DONG Q. On metacognition[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University, 1989(1): 68-74.)
[11] 袁红, 张海潮.基于搜索时间序列聚类的网络用户搜索策略识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(20): 94-103. (YUAN H, ZHANG H C. Network user search strategies recognition based on search time sequence clustering[J]. Library and information service, 2016, 60(20): 94-103.)
[12] FLAVELL J H. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving[J]. The nature of intelligence, 1976: 231-235.
[13] 汪玲, 郭德俊.元认知的本质与要素[J]. 心理学报, 2000, 32(4): 458-463. (WANG L, GUO D J. The nature and components of metacognition [J]. Acta psychologica sinica, 2000, 32(4): 458-463.)
[14] LIU C, SONG X, HANSEN P. Characterising users’ task completion process in learning-related tasks: a search pace model[J]. Journal of information science, 2021: 01655515211060527.
[15] LIU G Z, CHONG S S. Metacognition & conceptual drifting in interactive information retrieval: an exploratory field study[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 48(1): 1-9.
[16] CRESCENZI A. Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation in time-constrained in information search[C] //Proceedings of SIGIR 2016 workshop: searching as learning. Pisa: CEUR-WS, 2016:1-5.
[17] CHOI B, ARGUELLO J, CAPRA R, et al. The influences of a knowledge representation tool on searchers with varying cognitive abilities[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 2022, 41(1): 1-35.
[18] QUINTANA C, ZHANG M, KRAJCIK J. A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding[J]. Educational psychologist, 2005, 40(4): 235-244.
[19] BRAND-GRUWEL S, WOPEREIS I, WALRAVEN A. A descriptive model of information problem solving while using Internet[J]. Computers & education, 2009, 53(4): 1207-1217.
[20] BATES M J. Information search tactics[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1979, 30(4): 205-214.
[21] 袁红.探索式搜寻意图对搜寻策略选择的影响机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(3): 93-105. (YUAN H. Research on the influence mechanism of exploratory seeking intention on seeking strategy selection [J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(3): 93-105.)
[22] 陈静, 彭雪莹, 陆泉.突发公共卫生事件中大学生健康信息搜索策略研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(4): 119-128. (CHEN J, PENG X Y, LU Q. Query studies of health information search in public health emergency [J]. Information science, 2021, 39(4): 119-128.)
[23] 方舟, 洪采菲, 秦姝言, 等.自我调节学习情境下任务类型和学习认知策略对视频类搜索行为的影响[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(21): 84-96. (FANG Z, HONG C F, QIN S Y, et al. The effects of task type and learning cognitive strategies on video-type search behavior in a self-regulated learning context [J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(21): 84-96.)
[24] 宋筱璇, 刘畅.学习型搜索中用户信息源选择和使用策略研究[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(6): 655-666. (SONG X X, LIU C. Exploring users’ source selection and use strategies in learning related search [J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(6): 655-666.)
[25] LIU C, WEI Y. The impacts of time constraint on users' search strategy during search process[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 53(1): 1-9.
[26] 袁红.用户信息搜索策略转换模式研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(2): 44-51. (YUAN H. On the transformation model of users information search strategies [J]. Journal of modern information, 2020, 40(2): 44-51.)
[27] RHA E Y, MITSUI M, BELKIN N J, et al. Exploring the relationships between search intentions and query reformulations[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 53(1): 1-9.
[28] RHA E Y, SHI W, BELKIN N J. An exploration of reasons for query reformulations[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 54(1): 337-346.
[29] CATALANO A. Development and validation of the metacognitive strategies for library research skills scale (MS-LRSS)[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2017, 43(3): 178-183.
[30] FREREJEAN J, VAN STRIEN J L H, KIRSCHNER P A, et al. Effects of a modelling example for teaching information problem solving skills[J]. Journal of computer assisted learning, 2018, 34(6): 688-700.
[31] REISOĞLU İ, TOKSOY S E, ERENLER S. An analysis of the online information searching strategies and metacognitive skills exhibited by university students during argumentation activities[J]. Library & information science research, 2020, 42(3): 101019.
[32] TSAI M J. Online information searching strategy inventory (OISSI): a quick version and a complete version[J]. Computers & education, 2009, 53(2): 473-483.
[33] COLLINS-THOMPSON K, RIEH S Y, HAYNES C C, et al. Assessing learning outcomes in web search: a comparison of tasks and query strategies[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York: ACM, 2016: 163-172.
[34] KELLY D. Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users[J]. Foundations and trends in information retrieval, 2009, 3(1/2): 1-224.
[35] SMITH C L, RIEH S Y. Knowledge-context in search systems: toward information-literate actions[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York: ACM, 2019: 55-62.
[36] ROY N, TORRE M V, GADIRAJU U, et al. Note the highlight: incorporating active reading tools in a search as learning environment[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York: ACM, 2021: 229-238.
[37] CHOI B, ARGUELLO J, CAPRA R, et al. The influences of a knowledge representation tool on searchers with varying cognitive abilities[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 2023, 41(1): 1-35.
[38] SAVOLAINEN R. Heuristics elements of information-seeking strategies and tactics: a conceptual analysis[J]. Journal of documentation, 2017, 73(6): 1322-1342.
Outlines

/

〈 〉