[1] RAGIN C C. The comparative method:moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies[M]. Oakland:University of California Press, 2014.
[2] WIDDERSHEIM M M. A political theory of public library development[J]. Libri-international journal of libraries and information studies, 2018, 68(4):269-289.
[3] IANNACCI F, FEARON C, KAWALEK P, et al. Aligning the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) counter factual approach with the practice of retroduction:some preliminary insights[J]. Information systems journal, 2023, 33(3):467-485.
[4] 邓胜利, 付少雄. 定性比较分析(QCA)在图书情报学中的应用——以网络社区健康信息搜寻影响因素研究为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(12):23-28, 11. (DENG S L, FU S X. Applying qualitative comparative analysis to library and information science:a case study of influencing factors of network community health information seeking[J]. Information studies:theory & application, 2017, 40(12):23-28, 11.)
[5] 池毛毛, 杜运周, 王伟军. 组态视角与定性比较分析方法:图书情报学实证研究的新道路[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(4):424-434. (CHI M M, DU Y Z, WANG W J. Configurational perspective and qualitative comparative analysis:the new way of empirical research in library and information science[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(4):424-434.)
[6] 罗梦兰, 文庭孝, 罗贤春. 国外政府数据治理研究的文献分布、主题结构及热点演化[J]. 情报科学, 2023, 41(3):180-190. (LUO M L, WEN T X, LUO X C. Literature distribution, topic structure and hots pot evolution of foreign government data governance research[J]. Information science, 2023, 41(3):180-190.)
[7] LOWIK S, KRAAIJENBRINK J, GROEN A. The team absorptive capacity triad:a configurational study of individual, enabling, and motivating factors[J]. Journal of knowledge management, 2016, 20(5):1083-1103.
[8] BACON E, WILLIAMS M D, DAVIES G H. Recipes for success:conditions for knowledge transfer across open innovation ecosystems[J]. International journal of information management, 2019, 49:377-387.
[9] MAIER C, LAUMER S, JOSEPH D, et al. Turnback intention:an analysis of the drivers of it professionals' intentions to return to a former employer[J]. Mis quarterly, 2021, 45(4):1777-1806.
[10] KOUROUTHANASSIS P E, MIKALEF P, PAPPAS I O, et al. Explaining travellers online information satisfaction:a complexity theory approach on information needs, barriers, sources and personal characteristics[J]. Information & management, 2017, 54(6):814-824.
[11] FANG J, SHAO Y, WEN C. Transactional quality, relational quality, and consumer e-loyalty:evidence from SEM and fsQCA[J]. International journal of information management, 2016, 36(6):1205-1217.
[12] MATTKE J, MAIER C, REIS L, et al. Bitcoin investment:a mixed methods study of investment motivations[J]. European journal of information systems, 2021, 30(3):261-285.
[13] 赵一鸣, 潘沛, 黄瑶, 等. 组态视角下消费者信息搜索策略对搜索效果的影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(10):93-106. (ZHAO Y M, FAN P, HUANG Y, et al. Research on the influence of consumer information search strategies on search effect from the perspective of configuration[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(10):93-106.
[14] 谭春辉, 任季寒. 虚拟学术社区中用户信息搜寻行为的影响因素组合研究——基于模糊集定性比较分析方法[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(4):39-51. (TAN C H, RENG J H. Research on influencing factors of user information searching behavior in virtual academic community:based on fsQCA method[J]. Journal of modern information, 2022, 42(4):39-51.)
[15] NIKOU S, MOLINARI A, WIDEN G. The interplay between literacy and digital technology:a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach[J]. Information research, 2020,25(4):1-13.
[16] FU S, CHEN X, ZHENG H, et al. Understanding health information literacy of mHealth app users from digital wellbeing perspective:evidence from regression analysis and fsQCA[J]. Library & information science research, 2021, 43(3):101-108.
[17] 毕达天, 曹冉. 科研人员数据素养影响因素分析——基于SEM及fsQCA方法[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(1):11-20. (BI D T, CAO R. Analysis of factors that influence researchers' data literacy using SEM and fsQCA[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(1):11-20.)
[18] PARK Y, EL SAWY O A, FISS P C. The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility:a configurational approach[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2017, 18(9):648-686.
[19] INGRAMS A. Democratic transition and transparency reform:an fsQCA analysis of access to information laws in twenty-three countries[J]. Government information quarterly, 2018, 35(3):428-436.
[20] 陈美, 梁乙凯, 陈朝兵. 开放政府数据用户采纳意向影响机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(8):4-17, 3. (CHEN M, LIANG Y K, CHEN C B. Research on impact mechanism of users' adoption intention of open government data[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(8):4-17, 3.)
[21] 范蕴玉, 张宇. 基于fsQCA的公共阅读空间有效运行路径分析——以共同生产理论为研究视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(4):11-20. (FAN Y Y, ZHANG Y. Analysis of the effective operation path of public reading space based on fsQCA:taking co-production theory as a research perspective[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(4):11-20.)
[22] FERNANDEZ-LORES S, MARTINEZ-NAVARRO G, GAVILAN D. Success factors in audiovisual content websites based on comparative qualitative analysis[J]. Professional de la information, 2020, 29(6):119-174.
[23] MARX A, RIHOUX B, RAGIN C. The origins, development, and application of qualitative comparative analysis:the first 25 years[J]. European political science review, 2014, 6(1):115-142.
[24] LIU X, ZHANG C, WU J. Explaining consumers' continuous purchase intention toward subscriber-based knowledge payment platforms:findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA[J/OL]. Aslib journal of information management, 2023.[2023-09-10]. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AJIM-08-2022-.0359/full/html.
[25] KRIKSER T, ZASADA I, PIORR A. Socio-economic viability of urban agriculture a comparative analysis of success factors in Germany[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(7):1999.
[26] 杨金龙, 胡广伟. 移动学习采纳转化为持续的动因及其组态效应研究[J]. 情报科学, 2019, 37(7):125-132. (YANG J L, HU G W. Configuration effect of mobile learning adoption continuance conversion motivation[J]. Information science, 2019, 37(7):125-132.)
[27] GRACE J B. Structural equation modeling and natural systems[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[28] STOKKE O S. Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming, and international regime effectiveness[J]. Journal of business research, 2007, 60(5):501-511.
[29] 张驰, 郑晓杰, 王凤彬. 定性比较分析法在管理学构型研究中的应用:述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(4):68-83. (ZHANG C, ZHEGN X J, WANG F B. The application of qualitative comparative analysis(QCA) in configuration research in business administration field:commentary and future directions[J]. Foreign economics & management, 2017, 39(4):68-83.)
[30] HALLUR G G, SANE V S. Indian telecom regulatory framework in comparison with five countries:structure, role description and funding[J]. Digital policy regulation and governance, 2018, 20(1):62-77.
[31] MISANGYI V F, GRECKHAMER T, FURNARI S, et al. Aguilera, embracing causal complexity[J]. Journal of management, 2017, 43(1):255-282.
[32] PAPPAS I O, PAPAVLASOPOULOU S, MIKALEF P, et al. Identifying the combinations of motivations and emotions for creating satisfied users in SNSs:an fsQCA approach[J]. International journal of information management, 2020, 53:102-128.
[33] 邹纯龙, 马海群, 王今. 美国国家情报评估的影响因素与模式概化研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(2):13-21. (ZOU C L, MA H Q, WANG J. A study on influencing factors and model generalization of American national intelligence estimates[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(2):13-21.)
[34] RIHOUX B, RAGIN C C. Configurational comparative methods:qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques[M]. London:Sage, 2008.
[35] 王丰, 宣国良, 范徵. 资源基础观点及其在企业理论中的应用[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2002(4):50-54. (WANG F, XUAN G L, FAN H. Resource-based view and its application in enterprise theory[J]. Economic theory and business management,2002(4):50-54.)
[36] NGUYEN T, LIEM V N, NORTHEY G, et al. Realising the value of knowledge resources and capabilities:an empirical study[J]. Journal of knowledge management, 2019, 23(2):374-395.
[37] XU F, MICHAEL K, CHEN X. Factors affecting privacy disclosure on social network sites:an integrated model[J]. Electronic commerce research, 2013, 26(13):151-168.
[38] JIN Y, LIN Q, MAO S. Tanzanian farmers' intention to adopt improved maize technology:analyzing influencing factors using SEM and fsQCA methods[J]. Agriculture-Basel, 2022, 12(12):1991.
[39] 段锦云, 王重鸣, 钟建安. 大五和组织公平感对进谏行为的影响研究[J]. 心理科学, 2007(1):19-22. (DUAN J Y, WANG C M, ZHONG J A. A research on the impact of big five and perceived organizational justice on voice behavior[J]. Psychological science, 2007(1):19-22.)
[40] MAIER C, MATTKE J, PFLUEGNER K, et al. Smartphone use while driving:a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of personality profiles influencing frequent high-risk smartphone use while driving in Germany[J]. International journal of information management, 2020, 55:102-201.
[41] 潘颖, 郑建明, 孙红蕾. 图书情报学科的研究特征与学科生长点透视——近5年国家社科基金课题指南与立项数据对比[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2020, 40(7):28-35. (PAN Y, ZHENG J M, SUN H L. Study on the research characteristics and growth points of LIS in China:a comparative analysis of LIS guidelines and projects approved by the national social science fund of China in the last five years[J]. Library tribune, 2020, 40(7):28-35.)
[42] 贾旭东, 谭新辉. 经典扎根理论及其精神对中国管理研究的现实价值[J]. 管理学报, 2010, 7(5):656-665. (JIA X D, TAN X H. The actual value of the classical grounded theory and its spirit to China management research[J]. Chinese journal of management, 2010, 7(5):656-665.)
[43] GERRITS L, PAGLIARIN S. Social and causal complexity in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA):strategies to account for emergence[J]. International journal of social research methodology, 2021, 24(4):501-514.
[44] CERDA-MANSILLA E, RUBIO N, CAMPO S. Critical success factors for sharing information and knowledge of COVID-19 through Twitter[J]. Knowledge management research & practice, 2021, 19(4):445-453.
[45] ZHANG J, HU X, WU D, et al. Exploring the influence mechanism of Chinese young researchers' academic information avoidance behavior[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 2023, 49(2):102649.
[46] LEE J N, PARK Y, STRAUB D W, et al. Holistic archetypes of it outsourcing strategy:a contingency fit and configurational approach[J]. Mis quarterly, 2019, 43(4):1201-1226.
[47] SUN Y, WANG N, SHEN X L. Calculus interdependency, personality contingency, and causal asymmetry:toward a configurational privacy calculus model of information disclosure[J]. Information & management, 2021, 58(8):103556.
[48] GLASS G V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research[J]. Educational researcher, 1976, 5(10):3-8.
[49] DELL'ANGELO J, D'ODORICO P, RULLI M C, et al. The tragedy of the grabbed commons:coercion and dispossession in the global land rush[J]. World development, 2017, 92:1-12.
[50] ISHIKAWA K. Guide to quality control[M]. Tokyo:Asian Productivity Organization Tokyo, 1982.
[51] BARSALOU M A. Root cause analysis:a step-by-step guide to using the right tool at the right time[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2014.
[52] LARIOS-HERNANDEZ G J, REYES-MERCADO P. Market influencers for ICT advancement in small states-a comparative analysis[J]. Information technology for development, 2018, 24(3):612-631.
[53] 张旭东, 刘洋. 组态视角下元宇宙图书馆用户接受意愿影响因素研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2023(3):73-85. (ZHANG X D, LIU Y. Research on the influencing factors of user acceptance to metaverse library from the perspective of configuration[J]. Library theory and practice, 2023(3):73-85.)
[54] RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry:fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2009.
[55] LALICIC L, WEISMAYER C. Consumers' reasons and perceived value co-creation of using artificial intelligence-enabled travel service agents[J]. Journal of business research, 2021, 129(5):891-901.
[56] SKARMEAS D, LEONIDOU C N, SARIDAKIS C. Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Journal of business research, 2014, 67(9):1796-1805.
[57] SAHIBZADA U F, CAI J, LATIF K F, et al. Knowledge management processes, knowledge worker satisfaction, and organizational performance symmetric and asymmetrical analysis[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2019, 72(1):112-129.
[58] SHIH T Y, LIN C W. Cloud service adoption by firms in Taiwan:advancing trust theory and applications[J]. Information development, 2017, 33(5):495-511.
[59] PAPPAS I O, WOODSIDE A G. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA):guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing[J]. International journal of information management, 2021, 58:102310.
[60] VIS B. The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-N analyses[J]. Sociological methods & research, 2012, 41(1):168-198.
[61] STANK M A. Toward a theory of remixing in online innovation communities[J]. Information systems research, 2016, 27(4):773-791.
[62] LIU Y, MEZEI J, KOSTAKOS V, et al. Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioral research:a methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities[J]. Information systems journal, 2017, 27(1):59-89.
[63] CILESIZ S, GRECKHAMER T. Qualitative comparative analysis in education research:its current status and future potential[J]. Review of research in education, 2020, 44(1):332-369.
[64] 吴丹, 徐爽, 李秀园, 等. 近十年我国图书馆学研究中的理论使用分析[J]. 图书与情报, 2019(6):41-51, 2. (WU D, XU S, LI X Y, et al. Research on the usage of theory of library science in China of past decade[J]. Library and information, 2019(6):41-51, 2.)
[65] 杜运周, 李佳馨, 刘秋辰, 等. 复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法:研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3):180-197, 12-13. (DU Y Z, LI J X, LIU Q C, et al. Configurational theory and QCA method from a complex dynamic perspective:research progress and future directions[J]. Management world, 2021, 37(3):180-197, 12-13.)
