REVIEW & COMMENTARY

Perlocution: A Summary of Chinese Library Science Discourse Research

  • Yi Ling ,
  • Gong Jiaoteng ,
  • Tao Chengxu ,
  • Zhu Xiaona
Expand
  • 1 School of Public Administration, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105;
    2 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received date: 2023-09-01

  Revised date: 2023-11-12

  Online published: 2024-03-28

Supported by

This work is supported by Postgraduate Innovation Program in Hunan Province titled “Research on the Innovative Path of Library Science from the Perspective of New Liberal Arts” (Grant No. CX20220579).

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This paper explores the development of library science discourse research and promotes the construction of library science discourse system in the context of Chinese autonomous knowledge system and the discipline system, academic system, and discourse system of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics.[Method/Process] Through literature search and review, it clarified the academic background, philosophical starting point, and necessary connotation of library science discourse research, and sorted out its development from external examination and internal construction.[Result/Conclusion] From the external perspective, library science strengthens discourse research by introducing discourse positions, methods and theories. From the internal perspective, library science promotes discourse exploration at the levels of discourse form, practice and utility. In the future, library science discourse research should be oriented towards defining basic connotations, clarifying theoretical pursuits, and finding the right path to promote the construction of discourse systems.

Cite this article

Yi Ling , Gong Jiaoteng , Tao Chengxu , Zhu Xiaona . Perlocution: A Summary of Chinese Library Science Discourse Research[J]. Library and Information Service, 2024 , 68(6) : 142 -151 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.06.013

References

[1] 陈业奎. 图书馆学话语体系积极构建的意义[J]. 图书馆, 2018(2): 14-19. (CHEN Y K. Significance of discourse system of library science to construct actively[J]. Library, 2018(2): 14-19.)
[2] 张瑜. 学术逻辑与社会逻辑:图书馆学话语体系建构的两大向度[J]. 图书馆, 2020(1): 1-6. (ZHANG Y. Academic logic and social logic: two dimensions of the discourse system construction of library science[J]. Library, 2020(1): 1-6.)
[3] 苏新宁. 中国特色情报学学科体系、学术体系、话语体系论纲[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(4): 16-27. (SU X N. The discipline system, academic system and discourse system of intelligence studies with Chinese characteristics[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2021, 47(4): 16-27.)
[4] 张斌, 杨文. 论新时代中国特色档案学话语体系的构建[J]. 档案学通讯, 2019(5): 4-12. (ZHANG B, YANG W. On the construction of archives discourse system with Chinese characteristics in the new era[J]. Archives science bulletin, 2019(5): 4-12.)
[5] 杨文, 张斌. 再论新时代中国特色档案学话语体系的构建[J]. 图书情报知识, 2022, 39(4): 30-42. (YANG W, ZHANG B. Re-discussing the construction of discourse system of archival science with Chinese characteristics in the new era[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2022, 39(4): 30-42.)
[6] 龚蛟腾, 王璐, 易凌. 一级学科更名背景下图书馆学发展的机缘、困境与出路[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2022, 31(6): 3-12. (GONG J T, WANG L, YI L. Opportunities, dilemmas and solutions for the development of library science under the background of the renaming of first-level disciplines[J]. Journal of the National Library of China, 2022, 31(6): 3-12.)
[7] 福柯. 知识考古学[M]. 4版.董树宝, 译.北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2021. (FOUCAULT M. The archaeology of knowledge[M]. DONG S B, trans. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2021.)
[8] 费尔克拉夫. 话语与社会变迁[M]. 殷晓蓉, 译.北京: 华夏出版社, 2003. (FAIRCLOUGH N. Discourse and social change[M]. YIN X R, trans. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2003.)
[9] 贝克, 埃莱斯. 话语分析核心术语[M]. 黄国文, 刘明, 注. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2016. (BAKER P, ELLECE S. Key terms in discourse analysis[M]. HUANG G M, LIU M, trans. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2016.)
[10] WETHERELL M, TAYLOR S, YATES S J. Discourse and practice: a reader[M]. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2001.
[11] 蒋永福. 不再追问本质: 图书馆学理论的后现代走向[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(1): 5-7, 90. (JIANG Y F. No Longer questioning the nature: the postmodern trend of the library science theory[J]. Library and information service, 2010, 54(1): 5-7, 90.)
[12] 陈立华. 从理论话语到差异原理——体现多元性立论过程的后现代图书馆学批判分析[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2018(4): 13-15, 31. (CHEN L H. From discourse theory to principle of difference: a critical analysis of the post modern library science embodying the process of pluralism[J]. Library theory and practice, 2018(4): 13-15, 31.)
[13] 利科. 诠释学与人文科学:语言、行为、解释文集[M]. 孔明安, 张剑, 李西祥, 译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2012. (RICOEUR P. Hermeneutics and the human sciences: essays on language, action and interpretation[M]. KONG M A, ZHANG J, LI X X, trans. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 2012.)
[14] 索绪尔. 普通语言学教程[M]. 高名凯, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017. (DE SAUSSURE F. Course in general linguistics[M]. GAO M K, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2017.)
[15] 杨絮. 话语分析方法综述: 开辟LIS研究新视野[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2018(3): 59-67. (YANG X. Discourse analysis: broadening new vision for LIS research[J]. Digital library forum, 2018(3): 59-67.)
[16] 王翩然, 徐建华, 李耀昌. 倾听儿童的声音: 让儿童成为自己图书馆的评价主体[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(5): 102-115. (WANG P R, XU J H, LI Y C. Listening the children's voices: children as evaluation subjects of their libraries[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2017, 43(5): 102-115.)
[17] 魏辅轶, 檀博. 高校图书馆数字资源采购话语权的重建[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018, 38(5): 103-111. (WEI F Y, TAN B. Regaining the discursive power of academic libraries in the acquisition of digital resources[J]. Library tribune, 2018, 38(5): 103-111.)
[18] 王超, 谢钊. 代建制下公共图书馆主体话语权缺失成因、后果及对策研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2020(24): 8-13. (WANG C, XIE Z. Research on the lack of expression right of public library under the agent construction system: causes, consequences and countermeasures[J]. Research on library science, 2020(24): 8-13.)
[19] 袁曦临. 现代图书馆学学科定位之“锚”: 基于东南大学图书馆学教育的历史考察[J]. 情报资料工作, 2021, 42(6): 13-20. (The “anchor” of modern library science: a historical survey based on the Southeast University's library science education[J]. Information and documentation services, 2021, 42(6): 13-20.)
[20] 王宗义. 专业话语: 实践描述与思维构建——关于当代图书馆活动的若干思考[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(2): 13-23. (WANG Z Y. Professional terminology, a description of the practice and the concept structure: some thoughts concerning contemporary library activities[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2017, 43(2): 13-23.)
[21] 蔡迎春, 吴志荣. 泛化与思考:从学科属性看图书馆学的专业话语[J]. 图书馆, 2018(7): 37-43, 96. (CAI Y C, WU Z R. Generalization and thinking the professional discourse of library science from the view of subject[J]. Library, 2018(7): 37-43, 96.)
[22] 张瑜, 陈业奎. 走出图书馆学界话语权提升的困境[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2013(9): 3-5. (ZHANG Y, CHEN Y K. Out of the dilemma of enhancing the library science discourse power[J]. New century library, 2013(9): 3-5.)
[23] 张瑜. 思想是图书馆学界的话语权[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2013, 32(8): 23-26. (ZHANG Y. Ideas are the “discursive power” of library[J]. Library journal, 2013, 32(8): 23-26.)
[24] 刘兹恒. 试论图书馆学理论研究与社会价值的统一性[J]. 图书情报研究, 2012, 5(1): 1-4, 56. (LIU Z H. On the unity between the study of library science and social value[J]. Library and information studies, 2012, 5(1): 1-4, 56.)
[25] 于良芝. 公共图书馆服务的意义建构与认识盲点——对公共图书馆评估总结材料的话语分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2009, 35(4): 4-13. (YU L Z. The construction of “public library services” in China: discourse analysis of post-library-assessment discursive events[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2009, 35(4): 4-13.)
[26] 王平. 图书情报学教育使命的意义构建与认知差异——基于话语分析的中美比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(5): 51-54. (WANG P. The meaning construction and cognitive differences of missions of LIS education: a comparative study based on discourse analysis[J]. Library and information service, 2010, 54(5): 51-54.)
[27] 张雪英. 新闻媒体对图书馆社会形象的话语建构——以“读者留言东莞图书馆”事件为例[J]. 山东图书馆学刊, 2022(2): 79-83. (ZHANG X Y. The discursive construction of news media on the social image of library: take the event of “reader leaves a message for Dongguan Library” for example[J]. The library journal of Shandong, 2022(2): 79-83.)
[28] 陈晴晴. 关于公共图书馆设置问题的话语分析:中美比较研究[J]. 图书馆, 2013(5): 12-15. (CHEN Q Q. Discourses analysis of some problems about public library setting: a comparative study between China and US[J]. Library, 2013(5): 12-15.)
[29] 李长志, 丁敬达. iSchool联盟院校发展定位研究:批判性话语分析视角[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2021(20): 21-29. (LI C Z, DING J D. Research on the development positioning of iSchools: a critical discourse analysis perspective[J]. Research on library science, 2021(20): 21-29.)
[30] 杨絮, 于良芝. 兰开斯特的预言与iSchool的抱负:跨时代的话语分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2018, 44(3): 4-20. (YANG X, YU L Z. Lancaster's prophecy and iSchool's aspiration: a cross-time discourse analysis[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2018, 44(3): 4-20.)
[31] 章敏, 袁曦临. 图书馆媒介形象变迁的话语分析研究——基于1949—2020年《人民日报》相关报道[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2022(9): 90-96. (ZHANG M, YUAN X L. Discourse analysis on the changes of library's media image: based on the relevant reports of People's Daily from 1949 to 2020[J]. New century library, 2022(9): 90-96.)
[32] 李桂华, 黄琳. 政府路径的公共图书馆社会认知建构——对省级政府新闻办微博的话语分析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2023, 43(2): 39-48. (LI G H, HUANG L. Government path for developing social cognition about public library: a discourse analysis on microblog posts of provincial government information offices[J]. Library tribune, 2023, 43(2): 39-48.)
[33] 吕源, 彭长桂. 话语分析: 开拓管理研究新视野[J]. 管理世界, 2012(10): 157-171. (LV Y, PENG C G. Discourse analysis: broadening new vision for management research[J]. Journal of management world, 2012(10): 157-171.)
[34] 邱均平, 邹菲. 关于内容分析法的研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2004(2): 14-19. (QIU J P. ZOU F. A Study of content analysis methods[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2004(2): 14-19)
[35] 刘阳. 叙事研究——图书馆学研究的一种新方法[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2011(21): 2-5, 47. (LIU Y. Narrative research: a new method in library science research[J]. Research on library science, 2011(21): 2-5, 47.)
[36] 蒋永福. 后现代图书馆学的理论品格[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2009, 18(4): 23-29, 69. (JIANG Y F. Character of the theory of postmodern library science[J]. Journal of the National Library of China, 2009, 18(4): 23-29, 69.)
[37] 蒋永福, 付天松. 引文分析与互文性分析——图书情报学研究应该关注互文性分析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2011, 31(6): 313-320, 213. (JIANG Y F, FU T S. Citation analysis and intertextuality analysis: LIS research should focus on intertextuality analysis[J]. Library tribune, 2011, 31(6): 313-320, 213.)
[38] 蒋永福. 图书馆学话语的谱系学分析——图书馆学话语三大族系概述[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2007(1): 12-16. (JIANG Y F. Genealogical analysis of library science discourse[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2007(1): 12-16.)
[39] 王平, 袁珍珍, 柯平. 话语权力的交锋:基于知识考古学的中国特色图书馆学理论体系构建分析[J]. 图书馆, 2019(10): 1-7. (WANG P, YUAN Z Z, KE P. Analysis on the construction of the theoretical system of library science with Chinese characteristics based on knowledge archaeology[J]. Library, 2019(10): 1-7.)
[40] 朱晓峰, 蒋旭牧, 胡桓. 国际图书情报领域我国学科话语权探究:形成、演化与地位[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(5): 7-18, 6. (ZHU X F, JIANG X M, HU H. Research on China's discipline discourse power in the international library and information science field: formation, evolution and status[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(5): 7-18, 6.)
[41] 葛园园. 话语分析理论与图书馆学研究之探讨[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2013, 32(2): 18-23, 38. (GE Y Y. Discourse analysis and library science[J]. Library journal, 2013, 32(2): 18-23, 38.)
[42] 第三十图书馆教育组[J]. 新教育, 1923, 7(2/3): 295-317. (No.30 library education group[J]. New education, 1923, 7(2/3): 295-317.)
[43] 蒋颖, 黄长著. 图书馆学情报学学科名词术语工作的实践与思考[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2018, 38(5): 2-6. (JIANG Y, HUANG C Z. Practice and reflection on the terminology in library and information science[J]. Library work in colleges and universities, 2018, 38(5): 2-6.)
[44] 叶继元. 名词规范与统计、评价专题序言[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2018, 38(5): 1. (YE J Y. Preface to the topic on normative terminology, statistics, and evaluation[J]. Library work in colleges and universities, 2018, 38(5): 1.)
[45] 龚蛟腾, 易凌. 守正创新:“图书馆”机构话语的演变与趋向[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2021, 39(6): 93-103. (GONG J T, YI L. Inheritance and innovation: evolution and trend of institutional discourse of “library”[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2021, 39(6): 93-103.)
[46] 易凌, 龚蛟腾, 张晓芳. 中国古代图书馆学学术话语的近代转型——以“学”为中心的考察[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2022, 31(2): 16-25. (YI L, GONG J T, ZHANG X F. Modern transformation of academic discourse of ancient Chinese library science: an investigation centered on “science”[J]. Journal of the National Library of China, 2022, 31(2): 16-25.)
[47] 肖鹏. 从中国经验到中国方案:走向中国图书馆学理论研究的世界化时期[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(6): 12-23. (XIAO P. From Chinese experience to Chinese approach: towards the internationalization period of the theoretical research of library science[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2019, 45(6): 12-23.)
[48] 肖鹏. 中国图情领域的翻译与引介传统及其实践反思:以“译介谱系”为落足点[J]. 图书馆建设, 2020(3): 6-11, 27. (XIAO P. Academic tradition and practice of translation and introduction for library and information science in China: focusing on the genealogy of translation and introduction[J]. Library development, 2020(3): 6-11, 27.)
[49] 奥斯汀. 如何以言行事: 1955年哈佛大学威廉·詹姆斯讲座[M]. 杨玉成, 赵京超, 译. 北京:商务印书馆, 2013. (AUSTIN J L. How to do things with words: the William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955[M]. YANG Y C, ZHAO J C, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2013.)
[50] 塞尔. 表达与意义: 言语行为理论研究[M]. 王加为, 赵明珠, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017. (SEARLE J R. Expression and meaning: studies in the theory of speech acts[M]. WANG J W, ZHAO M Z, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2017.)
[51] 新时代图书馆学教育行动倡议书[J]. 图书情报知识, 2019(5): 32. (Proposal for library science education movement in a new era[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2019(5): 32.)
[52] 周亚, 孙健, 刘敏. 未来图书馆的新形态与新功能——2016年中国图书馆年会基础理论分会场综述[J]. 图书馆, 2017(1): 1-8, 23. (ZHOU Y, SUN J, LIU M. Library new forms and function in the future: review on basic theory session of 2016 Chinese library annual conference[J]. Library, 2017(1): 1-8, 23.)
[53] 姜乖俊. 图书馆学: 强制阐释与理论原创[J]. 图书馆建设, 2020(1): 39-43, 54. (JIANG G J. Library science: compulsory interpretation and theoretical originality[J]. Library development, 2020(1): 39-43, 54.)
[54] 刘琼, 周云峰, 刘桂锋. 中国图书馆学国际话语权新时代特征与内容要素[J]. 图书馆, 2023(1): 12-19, 50. (LIU Q, ZHOU Y F, LIU G F. New era characteristics and content elements of the international discourse of Chinese library science[J]. Library, 2023(1): 12-19, 50.)
[55] 陈信, 柯平. LIS视域内的话语权力和话语分析[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2015, 34(2): 34-36. (CHEN X, KE P. The power of discourse and discourse analyses in LIS[J]. Library journal, 2015, 34(2): 34-36.)
Outlines

/

〈 〉