[Purpose/Significance] The digital preservation alliance, as an effective form of long-term preservation of digital resources, faces various risks. Identifying and controlling the risks are significant for sustainable development of the alliance. [Method/Process] Based on relevant documents on digital preservation risk assessment, this research divided the risks into three categories, namely, technical risk, organizational risk, and copyright risk, and subdivided them into 10 risk factors and 30 specific manifestations. Then it investigated and analyzed the real risk events and the corresponding control strategies in the operation of 43 foreign digital preservation alliances. [Result/Conclusion] The research finds that risks are relatively prominent in system maintenance, institutional coordination and resource copyright. The alliances take certain control strategies, which have great reference for Chinese preservation community. This article suggests that it is necessary for the alliance in China to build a safe technical environment, design a sustainable organizational management plan, and establish a mechanism to balance copyright protection and resource sharing.
Si Li
,
Si Hanhui
,
Kong Beibei
,
Zhou Jing
,
Hu Jiying
. Analysis of Risk and Its Control Strategies of Foreign Digital Preservation Alliances[J]. Library and Information Service, 2024
, 68(10)
: 15
-23
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.10.002
[1] International Organization for Standard. ISO 14721: 2012 space data and information transfer systems-Open Archival Information System (OAIS)[EB/OL]. [2024-03-16]. https://www.iso.org/standard/57284.html.
[2] 郑建程, 张晓林, 赵艳, 等. 数字文献资源长期保存可持续支撑机制研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016(12): 1-8. (ZHENG J C, ZHANG X L, ZHAO Y. Study of sustainable support mechanisms for long term preservation of digital publications[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2016(12): 1-8.)
[3] 袁静, 焦玉英. 我国图书馆联盟风险的实证调查与分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(6): 48-56. (YUAN J, JIAO Y Y. Empirical investigation and analysis on the risks of library alliance in China[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2010, 36(6): 48-56.)
[4] 李文生.数字资源生命周期与长期保存政策[J]. 情报科学, 2012, 30(7): 1071-1075. (LI W S. Digital resource lifecycle and long-term preservation policy[J]. Information science, 2012, 30(7): 1071-1075.)
[5] 赵蜀蓉, 匡亚林, 王昆莉, 等. 政府数字资源长期保存:技术风险及其治理[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(12): 67-73. (ZHAO S R, KUANG Y L, WANG K L, et al. Research on risk management of long-term preservation technology of government digital resources[J]. Chinese public administration, 2021(12): 67-73.)
[6] 杨晨柳, 方安, 娄培, 等. 数字资源保存安全风险评估体系构建及实证研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2023(1): 61-68. (YANG C L, FANG A, LOU P, et al. Construction and empirical study of security risk assessment system for digital resource preservation[J]. Library theory and practice, 2023(1): 61-68.)
[7] WITTENBERG K, MORRISSEY S. Guest Post-The evolution of infrastructure: making a renewed investment in preservation at Portico[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/10/17/guest-post-the-evolution-of-infrastructure-making-a-renewed-investment-in-preservation-at-portico/.
[8] MOLLNARO M, PCOLAR D, GORE E.DPN final report[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://osf.io/md9yk/.
[9] ROGER C, SCHONFELD J. Why is the digital preservation network disbanding[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/12/13/digital-preservation-network-disband/.
[10] 高凡, 吴振新, 付鸿鹄, 等. 数字保存联盟可持续发展中的风险和教训分析——以美国数字保存网络为例[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2021, 11(5): 124-132. (GAO F, WU Z X, FU H H, et al. Analysis of risks and lessons in the sustainable development of digital preservation alliance: take the US Digital Preservation Network as an example[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2021, 11(5): 124-132.)
[11] 韩伟. 数字图书馆建设中著作权侵权责任风险规避路径研究——基于著作权案件司法审判引入转换性使用规则的视角[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2023(3): 64-69. (HAN W. Research on the ways to avoid the risk of copyright infringement liability in the construction of digital library: from the perspective of introducing transformational rules of use in judicial adjudication of copyright cases[J]. Library work and study, 2023(3): 64-69.)
[12] 档案馆安全风险评估指标体系[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://www.saac.gov.cn/daj/yaow/201902/4b764375c7e643619cb96ef330b0ed87.shtml. (Index system for security risk assessment of archives[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://www.saac.gov.cn/daj/yaow/201902/4b764375c7e643619cb96ef330b0ed87.shtml.)
[13] National Archives of Australia. Digital continuity 2020 policy[EB/OL]. [2024-03-16]. https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/information-management-policies/previous-policies.
[14] Digital Preservation Coalition. Risk and change management[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://www.dpconline.org/handbook/institutional-strategies/risk-and-change-management.
[15] ERA. Configuration management plan[EB/OL]. [2024-03-10]. https://www.archives.gov/files/era/recompete/config-mgmt-plan.pdf.
[16] ERPANET. ERPANET risk tool[EB/OL]. [2024-03-10]. https://erpanet.org/events/2003/paris/ERPAtraining-Paris_Report.pdf.
[17] APTrust. Disaster management plan[EB/OL]. [2024-03-10]. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wqzHXgulOMnMfbk1MaQuvhtWGJpyIWS2zxlSc9GTtew/edit.
[18] 司莉, 刘先瑞, 吴振新, 等. 国外数字保存联盟运营模式分析与启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(10): 4-14. (SI L, LIU X R, WU Z X, et al. Analysis and implications on the operation mode of foreign digital preservation alliances[J]. Library and information service, 2024, 68(10): 4-14.)
[19] 陈传夫, 孙异凡, 李秋实. 事件视角的图书馆发展风险研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2021(2): 88-99. (CHEN C F, SUN Y F, LI Q S. Study on library development risks from the perspective of events[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2021(2): 88-99.)
[20] NCGDAP. Geospatial web service[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/ncgdap/research.html.
[21] NDIIPP. Sustainability of digital formats: planning for Library of Congress Collections[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://www.digitalpreservation.gov/about/index.html.
[22] Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Science. Data security standards: integrity and availability[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://data-pass.org/sites/default/files/DataSecurity.pdf.
[23] SCHONFELD R C. More scholarly communications consolidation as institutional repository provider DuraSpace merges into Lyrasis[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/01/25/lyrasis-duraspace-merger/.
[24] MEADOWS A. Adieu to Educopia: an interview with Katherine Kinner[EB/OL]. [2024-02-26]. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/10/26/adieu-to-educopia-an-interview-with-katherine-skinner/.
[25] 袁静. 图书馆联盟风险防范研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2010. (YUAN J. Study on risk prevention of library consortium[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2010.)
[26] IIPC. Legal issues[EB/OL]. [2024-03-09]. https://netpreserve.org/web-archiving/legal-issues/.
[27] CLOCKSS. The benefits of participating in CLOCKSS[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://clockss.org/about/benefits/.
[28] MAC. Distributed digital preservation[EB/OL]. [2024-03-09]. https://metaarchive.org/how-ddp-works/.
[29] DuraSpace. Community contributors[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://dspace.lyrasis.org/join-the-community/.
[30] ADS. Instructions for depositors[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/.
[31] NDSA annual report 2015[EB/OL]. [2024-03-09]. https://ndsa.org/publications/.
[32] Nordic Web Archive[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://nwatoolset.sourceforge.net/docs/nwa@ecdl2003.pdf.
[33] Portico. Annual report 2021[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://dspace.lyrasis.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/AR-2021-DSpace.pdf.
[34] PR Newswire. Authors and authors' groups from Australia, Quebec, the U.K., and U.S. sue HathiTrust, the University of Michigan, and four other U.S. Universities for copyright infringement[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://www.prnasia.com/story/50952-1.shtml.
